• #861
i have always thought the graduation is connected in some way, but i doubt we will ever know.

I agree. I still would like to know more about the male acquaintance who was inside the house on the 7th who had problems remembering where he was on the evening of the 6th and the morning of the 7th. A lot of people have said over the years that "teenagers couldn't have committed the perfect crime" and while I mostly agree with that, we have no idea who was at these various graduation parties. There could have been people visiting graduating relatives not from the area who were present at these parties. IMO, the people attending the parties should be looked at more closely.
 
  • #862
Also regarding Garrison, he was let out of a Kentucky prison May 15th, 1992. The women went missing on June 7th, 1992. Garrison was arrested again in January of 1993 on a weapons and drug charge, and in the arresting officer's report, he says that immediatley after being cuffed, Garrison started saying he could give information about the three missing women. That does not strike me as someone, if you truly believe the Galloping Goose Motorcycle Club were involved, would do. He immediately was willing to give up potential information about their disappearances. IMO, I think it's possible that Garrison was told by someone he knew that they were involved in the disappearances, but that person had nothing to do with it. Garrison singing like a bird at the drop of a hat doesn't strike me as someone who would be fearful if the GGMC were actually involved in any capacity. I think Garrison used this "information" as leverage to get out of jail (where he would go on to rape an unfortunate victim) on a low bail. The cops thought he could provide them with useful information. It didn't hurt that he had a connection to Dustin Recla; he dated Dustin's girlfriend's mother sometime after the women disappeared. Garrison could not stay out of prison. He likely would have provided more concrete information if he was in fact involved, or knew the people involved. I think he's a road to nowhere.
 
  • #863
Does anyone have idea who the male acquaintance was mentioned early in one of the News-Leader articles?
1773093104260.webp
 
  • #864
Just found out about this case recently, so I apologize if I repeat other people's findings.

I was looking at some of the evidence and wanted to share my theories.

  • The small Yorkshire Terrier named Cinnamon (Suzie Streeter's) was found distressed, but unharmed. Most would normally think that there was a break-in of some sort, but that was not the case here. I am thinking that if the victims were kidnapped/abducted, it was by someone they knew and had access to the house.
    • The dog appeared anxious or upset, which was a critical detail in the case. Experts suspect the dog was locked in a room or bathroom during the abduction.
      • Cinnamon's presence indicated that the perpetrator may have been comfortable with dogs or quickly locked it away to prevent disruption, as mentioned on Reddit.
  • Broken Porch Light: The glass globe over the front porch light was broken. While initially seen as a sign of a struggle, its significance is debated.
    • This could have possibly been broken when the abductor came into the house. The victims could have heard the glass shatter and put Cinnamon in a room for safety. That's not really the best theory, but still a possibility.
  • House Condition: The television was left on and tuned to a fuzzy channel. Beds appeared to have been slept in, and Stacy's clothes from the previous night were found in the house, suggesting the women were abducted after settling in for the night.
    • It could possibly be someone from the graduation that came over?
  • Deleted Voicemail: A friend who arrived at the house before police inadvertently deleted a strange, obscene voicemail that may have been left by the perpetrator.
    • A very unlikely possibility, but what if this friend deleted the evidence and was the abductor?
  • The "Mother" Claim: In a 1996 interview, Cox told reporters, "I know they are dead. I'll say that. And I know that". He claimed he would disclose where they were buried only after his mother died. As of early 2026, he remains in prison and has not provided any further proof.

~~~
Other evidence:
Fingerprints and Forensic Evidence
  • Identified Prints: Nearly all fingerprints found at the residence were successfully identified as belonging to the missing women or the visitors who entered the house before police.
  • Unidentified Partial Print: There is reportedly one unidentified partial fingerprint in the case file, though it has never been matched to a suspect.
  • DNA and Biological Evidence: No confirmed DNA, blood, or other biological fluids belonging to a perpetrator were ever recovered from the home. In 2003, a search of a farm in Cassville uncovered "possible blood" on a section of a green vehicle, but forensic testing was inconclusive.
  • Deleted Voicemail: A potentially crucial "obscene" recording on the answering machine was accidentally deleted by a friend before police could listen to or record it.

---
Timeline:
Timeline of Last Known Locations (June 6–7, 1992)
The window for the abduction is narrow, estimated between 2:15 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. on June 7.
YouTube +1
  • 4:00 p.m. (June 6): Suzie and Stacy graduate from Kickapoo High School at the Hammons Student Center.
    Wikipedia +1
  • 6:00 p.m. – 10:00 p.m.: The girls attend several graduation parties. Sherrill Levitt is at home; she speaks with a friend at 11:15 p.m. about painting furniture.
    YouTube +2
  • 2:00 a.m. (June 7): Suzie and Stacy leave a party at Janelle Kirby’s house in Battlefield. They decide to sleep at Suzie's house (1717 E. Delmar) because Janelle's house is crowded with relatives.
    Wikipedia +1
  • 2:15 a.m.: Suzie and Stacy arrive at the Delmar house. Their cars are parked in the driveway, and they change out of their party clothes.
    City of Springfield, MO (.gov) +3
  • 8:00 a.m.: Janelle Kirby begins calling the house to finalize plans for a trip to a water park, but there is no answer.
  • 12:30 p.m.: Janelle and her boyfriend arrive at the house. They find it empty, the door unlocked, and the porch light glass shattered.

Hope that this case gets solved soon ~ no one deserves their story to be untold & forgotten.
 

Attachments

  • 1773671527561.webp
    1773671527561.webp
    70.6 KB · Views: 12
  • 1773671604533.webp
    1773671604533.webp
    109.9 KB · Views: 12
Last edited:
  • #865
I've always been confused about the voicemail that was accidentally deleted from the answering machine. When Janelle and Mike first went inside the house on the 7th, she received two obscene phone calls back to back and Janelle described the voice as "teenish". Janis McCall, when listening to the answering machine messages, claims that there was a "strange" message from a man on there and didn't elaborate. Was the voicemail an obscene phone call as well? Because it's never been clear to me that the voicemail was like the two calls Janelle answered. IMO, I think the voicemail is separate from the obscene phone calls.
 
  • #866
carey stayner carried out triple abduction. prior to this he did not even have a criminal record. CS killed carol sund in the hotel room then moved her body to her vehicle. he then took daughter julie and her friend silvana out of the hotel room. all part of his fantasy. so point 1 is possible.
Sorry to return so late to this, I've been away...plus watched part of a Pat Brown video that raised this question in my mind:

In comparing the two cases, the point could be made that Stayner didn't carry out a triple abduction - he committed double murder in the motel room, and then just a single abduction. Which, altho truly horrific, was probably easier to do/ get away with (if he'd disposed of the vehicle more effectively.)

When detectives checked the motel room - which hadn't been cleaned - they found some odd things like missing linen, but no signs of violence, much less murders.

Could there have been similar murder/murders in the Springfield 3 case, so the perp(s) didn't have to control 3 living victims to leave the home?

If not, how many triple sex-crime abductions from a home has there ever been? It's extremely unusual.

There's a case where 3 women were lured onto a boat. The unsolved case of three female teens who disappeared from a mall. The case with three separate abductions. But 3 at the same time, from a home?

To me, one thing it shows is apparent restraint on the part of the perp(s). Usually, sex-motivated perps act immediately to fulfill their fantasy. They may murder someone who is in the way, so they can get on with their focus. But to take 3 people from the home, and then take them all somewhere, and then what to do with the likely assertive maternal tiger...

Why not kill one of the women and leave her there...?

I don't enjoy this thought process, but it is very unlike more typical abductions.

JMO
 
  • #867
I feel odd jumping in here, so forgive me.

Because I have followed this case for so, so long, I will occasionally be inspired to just think about it. I don't even know these people. I didn't grow up in Springfield, MO. But at the time of their disappearance, I was roughly the same age as Stacy and Suzie. And, like many, my initial introduction to this case happened with CBS' "48 Hours" news magazine, in 1992. I have the luxury of being able to turn these thoughts off and I do.

As just a simple, ordinary bystander, I think about this case probably more than any other because it touched me all those years ago. However, I cannot begin to imagine the sorrow and desolation that Bartt Streeter, the McCall's and all other friends and family have felt for the last 34 years. Losing them is one thing, not knowing what happened after the early morning hours of June 7th, 1992 is quite another.

Quite often, I'll be reading about or listening to another case detail and my mind will drift back to these women. I feel skeevy even referring to it as a "case." This is their lives. It's as real as the nose on your face. As I tend to do, I'll start looking around to see if something makes sense to me now and it never does. This go-around, I decided to kind of go back to the beginning. I saw a Reddit post about this subject description/sketch and a known person that has been mentioned before.

I assume the grand jury that convened and looked into this individual and nothing came of it (obviously). But, did the Springfield PD ever conclusively tie the sighting of this 'reddish-brown' haired man to Ricky West (aka Ricky Dykes)? It damn near looks like practically modeled for the composite. It's uncanny.

If you dig too far into this, you'll start to see speculation beyond what is known. That's where I try and stop myself. It's cathartic and even helpful to speculate. However, sometimes, that speculation takes on a life of its own and becomes cemented as fact. For instance, I see speculation that West a.k.a. Dykes knew Steve Garrison. 🤷‍♂️ Is that true? I haven't a clue.

There's an investigative axiom that goes 'if you can figure out the motive, you can find the offender'. That's just the problem here. What possible motive could there have been to abduct Ms. Streeter, Suzie and Stacy in the middle of the night from a residential dwelling.

I'm asking, of course, semi-rhetorically.

the-sketch-compared-with-one-of-the-grand-jury-3-members-v0-qo3oj21ca45f1.jpg.webp
the-sketch-compared-with-one-of-the-grand-jury-3-members-v0-gitgny4ca45f1.png.webp
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
140
Guests online
7,776
Total visitors
7,916

Forum statistics

Threads
645,284
Messages
18,837,254
Members
245,610
Latest member
RussWill7458
Top