I feel odd jumping in here, so forgive me.
Because I have followed this case for so, so long, I will occasionally be inspired to just think about it. I don't even know these people. I didn't grow up in Springfield, MO. But at the time of their disappearance, I was roughly the same age as Stacy and Suzie. And, like many, my initial introduction to this case happened with CBS' "
48 Hours" news magazine, in 1992. I have the luxury of being able to turn these thoughts off and I do.
As just a simple, ordinary bystander, I think about this case probably more than any other because it touched me all those years ago. However, I cannot begin to imagine the sorrow and desolation that Bartt Streeter, the McCall's and all other friends and family have felt for the last 34 years. Losing them is one thing, not knowing what happened after the early morning hours of June 7th, 1992 is quite another.
Quite often, I'll be reading about or listening to another case detail and my mind will drift back to these women. I feel skeevy even referring to it as a "
case." This is their
lives. It's as real as the nose on your face. As I tend to do, I'll start looking around to see if something makes sense to me now and it never does. This go-around, I decided to kind of go back to the beginning. I saw a Reddit post about this subject description/sketch and a known person that has been mentioned before.
I assume the grand jury that convened and looked into this individual and nothing came of it (obviously). But, did the Springfield PD ever conclusively tie the sighting of this '
reddish-brown' haired man to Ricky West (aka Ricky Dykes)? It damn near looks like practically modeled for the composite. It's uncanny.
If you dig too far into this, you'll start to see speculation beyond what is known. That's where I try and stop myself. It's cathartic and even helpful to speculate. However, sometimes, that speculation takes on a life of its own and becomes cemented as fact. For instance, I see speculation that West a.k.a. Dykes knew Steve Garrison.

Is that true? I haven't a clue.
There's an investigative axiom that goes 'if you can figure out the motive, you can find the offender'. That's just the problem here. What possible motive could there have been to abduct Ms. Streeter, Suzie and Stacy in the middle of the night from a residential dwelling.
I'm asking, of course, semi-rhetorically.