HmmWhoKnows
Former Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2011
- Messages
- 455
- Reaction score
- 557
Unless Suzie wasn't great at directions. Never assume!
LOL! Granted. The post I was quoting though, was in response to another post that stated Suzie had never been to Battlefield. I’m pretty sure that’s not right. I think, IMHO, that Suzie lived out there in the suburbs along with Stacy and Janelle before her mom and stepdad divorced. At any rate,it’s likely an unimportant detail.Unless Suzie wasn't great at directions. Never assume!
I think it just makes sense to follow the person you’re staying with if you’re leaving the same place at the same time.
Taking both cars seems silly since they were going to the same place.I think American compared to other countries like the UK have a much bigger driving culture. Because here if I had plans with friends no way would we both use cars as it would be weird to and also anti social. So I find Stacey driving her car to Suzies that night weird but in the context of the way you guys drive absolutely everywhere I guess it was normal.
It makes sense based on where the cars were parked.I think it just makes sense to follow the person you’re staying with if you’re leaving the same place at the same time.
It makes sense based on where the cars were parked.
However, I don't think it's safe to assume Suzie knew Battlefield streets.
The Apco clerk saw Levitt at 2:15am. The girls supposedly left Battlefield a little after 2:15am. So it's interesting to know if they all three crossed paths or not back to the house.
IMO, Sherrill beat them home and was just getting ready for bed. And the girls came in around 2:45-3am.
To be fair, that's what a lot of "boogeymen" type look like. I question the tips about van drivers because people are putting an assumption on a van being used at all.This is the first time I have ever seen a sketch of the person involved and Christ that person would scare the crap out of me. So much hair, I’m amazed if the perp did look like that that nobody would recognise that person as that’s quite a distinctive look he has going on.
ETA - I know the person could of shaved it off after the attack but hair doesn’t grow like that over night so that would take months of hair growth.
It makes sense based on where the cars were parked.
However, I don't think it's safe to assume Suzie knew Battlefield streets.
The Apco clerk saw Levitt at 2:15am. The girls supposedly left Battlefield a little after 2:15am. So it's interesting to know if they all three crossed paths or not back to the house.
IMO, Sherrill beat them home and was just getting ready for bed. And the girls came in around 2:45-3am.
I can’t imagine somebody who looked like that being able to pursued 3 women out of their home that night.
Some people think the smashing of the bulb was a rouse to get somebody out of the home but nobody is answering the door to that at 3am!
Here is a full timeline from June 21, 1992 Newsleader.
Attached.
4140 S. Fremont. There's an Arvest Bank there now. The Rapid Roberts was where "Wanda" was from the 48 Hours clip.What purpose was there getting her out of the house if she returned home prior to the girls arrived?
That would seem to assure she would likely be awake when they got there. These would only accomplish the opposite of what was needed to gain entry.
Where exactly was this APCO station? What was the address?
The bulb was not broken. It was the surrounding globe.
Incidentally both the porch light and yard light were controlled by the same light switch inside the house.
I attached another timeline piece.
This one mentions a brown GM van/truck at the Signal on Glenstone not far from 1717 Delmar. This was at 4:30am...suspicious men reported.
4140 S. Fremont. There's an Arvest Bank there now. The Rapid Roberts was where "Wanda" was from the 48 Hours clip.
Instead of not understanding the tips and the "why" I would assume they are true first then figure out what could have happened with the assumption that they are true. The Apco sighting seemed to be a damn good lead.
Yes.I do apologise if im being thick here but is the 10-10.30 sighting saying the girls were with a 30 year old male?
That's for the reader to interpret. You're right about "monumental."Not to be argumentative, but if it was truly accurate it would be monumental. If it were true why waste time on the van and unreliable witnesses. I don’t get that part.