Missouri - The Springfield Three--missing since June 1992 - #8

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #561
Do we know if Nigel went to at any of the parties that night?
 
  • #562
Worsham is basically saying there's nothing to the Mike angle. They cleared up the suspicions you guys are discussing ad nauseum 26 years later is what he means, IMO.

Maybe they should revisit some folks.
 
  • #563
I’m just going to state my final conclusion and I won’t attempt to debate it further.

I believe it was a single male predator who knew police procedure and once he rendered the women defenseless, he staged the crime to confuse everyone.

He was also extremely lucky the crime scene was so contaminated by people coming to the house. It was a perfect storm.

I do not believe this is some grand conspiracy. The person I suspect has openly stated he is always armed. I was informed the perp had a gun and wore a hat. There was DNA found but unidentified. My suspect has no DNA on file.

He lived and worked some distance from Springfield but round trip was within one day’s driving distance. My trusted source viewed him at his place of employment and had tracked him over a ten year period.

The suspect has no criminal history.

That the police mishandled the case is proven by the prosecutors’s own assertions. But they didn’t do it.
 
  • #564
So I 'assume' you've contacted 'Crimestoppers' about your suspect?
 
  • #565
Posted another witness account in the Images only NO DISCUSSION board


Could the young girl of been wrong about the ages of the men she saw?

That house I thought was at the end of the block so you would of thought that the witness couldn’t of been confused.

Is Cowboy wear normal in that part of the world?
 
  • #566
you really need to keep up with your posts mm
now you have a name that you can provide to the police?
thought he was a policeman....no wait....ur source wont reveal who it is.

so today its a poster on websleuths who keeps bringing up the other girl.....
well that's likely me.
I do it all the time. and if that's what you got …..sweetie.....you better start again lmao

the silly rot with no substance or relevance that gets thrown around here but oh no lets not talk about the people WHO WERE THERE OR WHAT THEY DID.

We wont be thrown off the topic no matter how much you try and hijack the thread :cool:

Just so you know, I have reported your hostile post. The only hijacking going on is gratuitous insults. And that is not coming from me.

I don’t mind disagreements but I do mind having my motives questioned. That the kids acted foolishly is not in question but that they somehow conspired in a bizarre scheme to kill these young women does not pass the smell test with me.

I would ask a very simple question. What was the motive?

My source never gave me a name. My suspect may or may not be the same person. His name came through back channels within LE. He saw the name in police files. I did not.

Yes, I have a name and I can report it to the police. He has been on this forum and may still be using another screen name.
 
Last edited:
  • #567
For me the motive for Mike and Janelle to not reveal what they knew would be they was scared shitless.

3 women being taken and killled proves whoever was behind this wasn’t kidding around and was prepared to do whatever it took to silence them.

I still find the phone call that Janelle took highly suspicious and as far as I am aware LE couldn’t trace it. So we have no idea what was actually said on that call.

IMO
 
  • #568
Could the young girl of been wrong about the ages of the men she saw?

That house I thought was at the end of the block so you would of thought that the witness couldn’t of been confused.

Is Cowboy wear normal in that part of the world?

I wouldn’t say so. I think people in Springfield dressed typically as most of us do.

I suppose some of the themed night spots they may.

I’m unclear of what house you are referring to. Sherrills house was about in the middle but set off Delmar more than is typical. I would guess it was built in the 1950s or perhaps earlier.

As I recall from communicating with one of the reporters who wrote about this case she told me the women at George’s were wearing western style clothing. That didn’t seem to fit and the timeline didn’t jibe.
 
  • #569
JUST A THOUGHT ...Stacy and Suzie could have died in an accident (what do teens do at parties? Drink alcohol, possibly experiment with drugs) OD'd or drowned or ________.

Sherrill is called....she freaks out, accused whoever of murder and threatened to call the cops.
Motive: silence her.

Now it's the WHO is panicked 'enough' to resort to extreme measures? Here's my guess, and it's only a guess, nothing to substantiate it with, just tossing thoughts around so no hostility intended....
An adult. Motivated to protect those being accused of murder.

I know. Lots of holes for LE to 'fill up'. Bottom line. The 'kids/children', in this scenario, are innocent b/c it IS difficult to think classmates could murder anyone.
Who the adult was, I have only suspicions of which I will safely keep to myself. Not worth getting prosecuted over and I have nothing to offer up as concrete 'proof' of anything. Just like the rest of the people one here who shall go nameless. o_O
 
  • #570
For me the motive for Mike and Janelle to not reveal what they knew would be they was scared shitless.

3 women being taken and killled proves whoever was behind this wasn’t kidding around and was prepared to do whatever it took to silence them.

I still find the phone call that Janelle took highly suspicious and as far as I am aware LE couldn’t trace it. So we have no idea what was actually said on that call.

IMO

Sounds good too. ;)
 
  • #571
I wouldn’t say so. I think people in Springfield dressed typically as most of us do.

I suppose some of the themed night spots they may.

I’m unclear of what house you are referring to. Sherrills house was about in the middle but set off Delmar more than is typical. I would guess it was built in the 1950s or perhaps earlier.

As I recall from communicating with one of the reporters who wrote about this case she told me the women at George’s were wearing western style clothing. That didn’t seem to fit and the timeline didn’t jibe.


I apologise as for some reason I thought Sherrill’s home was the last house with just a business complex next door which nobody would of been at because it was early hours of the morning.

I assumed because the house was so far back it would of been the last house on the street.

Also because it was so far back it’s a odd house for a random sexual predator to sumble across. A lot bigger nicer homes in that vacuity that would draw the eye. imo
 
  • #572
Do we know if Nigel went to at any of the parties that night?
I doubt she went to any. She was older and most likely would only know Suzie.
 
  • #573
I wouldn’t say so. I think people in Springfield dressed typically as most of us do.

I suppose some of the themed night spots they may.

I’m unclear of what house you are referring to. Sherrills house was about in the middle but set off Delmar more than is typical. I would guess it was built in the 1950s or perhaps earlier.

As I recall from communicating with one of the reporters who wrote about this case she told me the women at George’s were wearing western style clothing. That didn’t seem to fit and the timeline didn’t jibe.
I thought they were talking to guys in western style clothing. What kind of clothing would that be?
 
  • #574
I wonder if Sherrill did hair for any of Suzie’s classmates. It would’ve been an opportunity for Suzie’s friends to get to know another side of Sherrill.
I wonder if she did any hair for prom at her house. Or even that night idk she was possibly more focused on her daughter and watching the graduation.
 
  • #575
JUST A THOUGHT ...Stacy and Suzie could have died in an accident (what do teens do at parties? Drink alcohol, possibly experiment with drugs) OD'd or drowned or ________.

Sherrill is called....she freaks out, accused whoever of murder and threatened to call the cops.
Motive: silence her.

Now it's the WHO is panicked 'enough' to resort to extreme measures? Here's my guess, and it's only a guess, nothing to substantiate it with, just tossing thoughts around so no hostility intended....
An adult. Motivated to protect those being accused of murder.

I know. Lots of holes for LE to 'fill up'. Bottom line. The 'kids/children', in this scenario, are innocent b/c it IS difficult to think classmates could murder anyone.
Who the adult was, I have only suspicions of which I will safely keep to myself. Not worth getting prosecuted over and I have nothing to offer up as concrete 'proof' of anything. Just like the rest of the people one here who shall go nameless. o_O
I think it’s as plausible as anything else.
 
  • #576
I thought they were talking to guys in western style clothing. What kind of clothing would that be?
Wranglers, boots, western shirt, possibly hat for the men. Very popular in that area at that time.
 
  • #577
Could the young girl of been wrong about the ages of the men she saw?

That house I thought was at the end of the block so you would of thought that the witness couldn’t of been confused.

Is Cowboy wear normal in that part of the world?

Kids may or may not judge age accurately. I'm an adult and still have trouble guessing an age. When you are a kid an adult can seem so much older than you (or that's maybe just me lol). Age can be judged against parents and siblings and how they look.
 
  • #578
Why after 1.5 years did the lead investigator Doug Thomas think that Steve Garrison and his associates were the direction to look for this crime?

Why was Cox interviewed as a suspect?

Why was Larry Hall interviewed in 2012?

Ex cons interviewed. Vans painted. Buzzard searching. I think there's a pattern here if you look closely.
 
  • #579
Why after 1.5 years did the lead investigator Doug Thomas think that Steve Garrison and his associates were the direction to look for this crime?

Why was Cox interviewed as a suspect?

Why was Larry Hall interviewed in 2012?

Ex cons interviewed. Vans painted. Buzzard searching. I think there's a pattern here if you look closely.
I'm not one to usually defend police. Why do you think there is a cover up?
 
  • #580
Why after 1.5 years did the lead investigator Doug Thomas think that Steve Garrison and his associates were the direction to look for this crime?

Why was Cox interviewed as a suspect?

Why was Larry Hall interviewed in 2012?

Ex cons interviewed. Vans painted. Buzzard searching. I think there's a pattern here if you look closely.


Was Cox not interviewed because of the family of one of his victims told LE to look into him?

His fake alibi is still weird but maybe with his history he knew the police would come knocking at his door.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
110
Guests online
2,525
Total visitors
2,635

Forum statistics

Threads
632,675
Messages
18,630,305
Members
243,245
Latest member
St33l
Back
Top