Misty C. #4

Status
Not open for further replies.
“She either won’t or can’t account for what she was doing,” Greenwood said.

She has told investigators she was alone with the children that night.

“She is the person who has to know what happened,” he said.


Authorities will not say what evidence contradicts what they were told in interviews, but Greenwood said there was no sign of forced entry to the mobile home where Haleigh disappeared.

http://www.jacksonville.com/news/me...arrowing_in_haleighs_disappearance_police_say
BBM

There is a huge difference in "won't" and "can't", imo. Maybe it is like some have been saying all along...and she really cannot tell them anything more since she was asleep when Haleigh went missing, imo.

If someone did unlock the door without her knowledge...how is she supposed to account for it? Again, it means it is possible she cannot tell them more than what she knows and has already told them, imo. If it wasn't enough in the beginning, it isn't going to be enough now, imo. They can doubt her all they want, but maybe there isn't any more to tell, imo.
 
If Crystal wanted to file charges against Misty, could she? Would that force LE to get Misty to be re interviewed?

That is a great question! Hmmm...I mean, some would say that Crystal is just doing it to take attention away from Haleigh and maybe a judge would dismiss the case. However, if there was a case Misty would have to answer question, I would think.

Also, if it is true that people know Misty was not home that night it would be neglect. I wonder if the reason LE wants others to come forward is because the people that are making the claim that she was not home are people like Nay Nay and Amber..just speculating...other drug/thugs type of people that their testimony would not hold to well in court.
 
Who was it who said Ron initially told him he was keeping his enemies (e.g., Misty) close?
Was it the bounty hunter?
 
I went to see if Misty had any new info on her my-space and find title to be a little snarky. Seems as if she is not taking Haleigh's disappearance serious.

This is her my-space title:
~ haleigh's ~ step ~ mommy ~ i ~love ~ you ~ha
 
ha is nickname for haleigh that Misty uses - she has used it in a few of her interviews.

I went to see if Misty had any new info on her my-space and find title to be a little snarky. Seems as if she is not taking Haleigh's disappearance serious.

This is her my-space title:
~ haleigh's ~ step ~ mommy ~ i ~love ~ you ~ha
 
“She either won’t or can’t account for what she was doing,” Greenwood said.

She has told investigators she was alone with the children that night.

“She is the person who has to know what happened,” he said.


Authorities will not say what evidence contradicts what they were told in interviews, but Greenwood said there was no sign of forced entry to the mobile home where Haleigh disappeared.

http://www.jacksonville.com/news/me...arrowing_in_haleighs_disappearance_police_say
BBM

There is a huge difference in "won't" and "can't", imo. Maybe it is like some have been saying all along...and she really cannot tell them anything more since she was asleep when Haleigh went missing, imo.

If someone did unlock the door without her knowledge...how is she supposed to account for it? Again, it means it is possible she cannot tell them more than what she knows and has already told them, imo. If it wasn't enough in the beginning, it isn't going to be enough now, imo. They can doubt her all they want, but maybe there isn't any more to tell, imo.

If she just said "I was sleeping, I don't know what happened, I have no idea", what evidence could there be that doesn't fit in with her story? (Short of witnesses seeing her awake or placing Haleigh elsewhere that night.) I really doubt they'd expect her to explain in detail how the stranger abductor she didn't see unlocked the door or how the perp operated otherwise. It stands to reason she wouldn't know if she wasn't in on the plan and didn't wake up, and it's not SOP to demand this knowledge from the victims; it's for LE to find out.

Instead the problems seem to be things she would know like what she did that night herself. She's told them something and IMO the statement that there is physical evidence that does not fit in with her story makes it look more like a case of won't tell the truth than can't know things that I didn't do or see.


From the press release:
Sh
e has failed to provide any sort of detailed accounting of the hours during the late evening and early morning of Haleigh’s disappearance. Furthermore, physical evidence at the scene contradicts Misty’s sketchy account of her evening activities
.
 
I went to see if Misty had any new info on her my-space and find title to be a little snarky. Seems as if she is not taking Haleigh's disappearance serious.

This is her my-space title:
~ haleigh's ~ step ~ mommy ~ i ~love ~ you ~ha

maybe she meant to write I love you haleigh and didn't notice the space ran out

how many characters can you get in the title?
 
maybe she meant to write I love you haleigh and didn't notice the space ran out

how many characters can you get in the title?

Seems like it is not "ha" as in "ha ha ha", but it's "Hay", as in short for Haleigh. (7th grade spelling....)
 
“She either won’t or can’t account for what she was doing,” Greenwood said.

She has told investigators she was alone with the children that night.

“She is the person who has to know what happened,” he said.


Authorities will not say what evidence contradicts what they were told in interviews, but Greenwood said there was no sign of forced entry to the mobile home where Haleigh disappeared.

http://www.jacksonville.com/news/me...arrowing_in_haleighs_disappearance_police_say
BBM

There is a huge difference in "won't" and "can't", imo. Maybe it is like some have been saying all along...and she really cannot tell them anything more since she was asleep when Haleigh went missing, imo.

If someone did unlock the door without her knowledge...how is she supposed to account for it? Again, it means it is possible she cannot tell them more than what she knows and has already told them, imo. If it wasn't enough in the beginning, it isn't going to be enough now, imo. They can doubt her all they want, but maybe there isn't any more to tell, imo.

ITA. Plus, the fact that there is no signs of forced entry doesn't necessarily contradict what she says. There were other people in the house who could have easily undone the deadbolt earlier in the day.

I think it is sad that rather than taking the opportunity to ask the public to look for Haleigh, all they did yesterday, was once again, try to blame their lack of progress in the investigation on a teenager with a 7th grade education.
 
ITA. Plus, the fact that there is no signs of forced entry doesn't necessarily contradict what she says. There were other people in the house who could have easily undone the deadbolt earlier in the day.

I think it is sad that rather than taking the opportunity to ask the public to look for Haleigh, all they did yesterday, was once again, try to blame their lack of progress in the investigation on a teenager with a 7th grade education.

IMO dropping out of school at seventh grade does not mean you can't be criticized publicly if you lie to LE.

The press release doesn't say "We suspect Misty because she can't explain how the perp opened the door." It says she can't account for her own activities.
 
IMO dropping out of school at seventh grade does not mean you can't be criticized publicly if you lie to LE.

The press release doesn't say "We suspect Misty because she can't explain how the perp opened the door." It says she can't account for her own activities.

They can criticise her publicly all they want....but it doesn't seem to be helping the case, quite the opposite. It is what it is. Surely they aren't being outfoxed by a teenager and should just get on with their jobs instead of making excuses.

Why should she be able to explain how the perp opened the door? How do you know her brother didn't undo the dead bolt when he was over earlier in the evening? What if she didn't see him do it? How would she explain that?
 
They can criticise her publicly all they want....but it doesn't seem to be helping the case, quite the opposite. It is what it is. Surely they aren't being outfoxed by a teenager and should just get on with their jobs instead of making excuses.

Why should she be able to explain how the perp opened the door? How do you know her brother didn't undo the dead bolt when he was over earlier in the evening? What if she didn't see him do it? How would she explain that?

My point was that LE has never (to my knowledge) claimed that they consider Misty's story suspicious because she can't explain how the perp opened the door. They say they consider her story suspicious because she can't explain what she herself did that night in a way that fits with the physical evidence they have.
 
They can criticise her publicly all they want....but it doesn't seem to be helping the case, quite the opposite. It is what it is. Surely they aren't being outfoxed by a teenager and should just get on with their jobs instead of making excuses.

Why should she be able to explain how the perp opened the door? How do you know her brother didn't undo the dead bolt when he was over earlier in the evening? What if she didn't see him do it? How would she explain that?


I, personally, don't see them as criticizing MC. I see investigators frustrated because she won't speak to them and when she does, she doesn't give a straight story. IMO, they are trying another avenue of putting pressure on her in order to get her to help in the investigation. LE asking for anyone with knowledge of her activities that evening, they obviously don't believe she was simply home sleeping and didn't know anything.

Saying LE isn't doing their job properly would be like saying OCSO didn't investigate properly in the beginning of kc Anthony's case. It's got to be pretty darn difficult to investigate a crime when all you get are lies, contradictions and refusal to cooperate.
 
Seems like it is not "ha" as in "ha ha ha", but it's "Hay", as in short for Haleigh. (7th grade spelling....)

(This isn't directed at you but to the universe in general.) I quit school after the 7th grade and went to work (none of that was legal but we needed food and shelter). I got a GED later and have spent way too much time in grad school since.

My point is, you can have only a 7th grade education and not be an idiot. I could read, write, spell, think quite clearly and critically, make decisions, be trusted to manage money, and run a household that had no sane parent to run it.

Consequently, it is not a valid excuse for MC's behavior and I wish TN had not used it as such. She is not 13 years old anymore, she's a woman and should comport herself as such.
 
How many hours have they spent questionning her so far?

I haven't seen it updated recently, this was months ago:

Putnam County Sheriff, Jeff Hardy says that Misty Croslin Cummings holds all the answers in the investigation of Haleigh Cummings disappearance. Misty claims she was there the whole time the night Haleigh disappeared. But, Sheriff Hardy says Misty continues to make conflicting statements about what happened.

“We’ve spent over 30 hours interviewing Misty and we’ve had some of the brightest law enforcement minds in the world interview her, and we can’t seem to bridge that gap.”
 
Maybe Ron knows the whole story, doesn't feel it has anything to do with Haleigh, and wishes LE would just move on and look for the perp.

If it has nothing to do with Haleigh there seems to be no reason not to come clean and let them move on to look for the real perp. What could be more important than a missing child?
 
I'm wondering if these new statements from LE and the pressure means an arrest may be coming soon . . . . Well, I can hope, anyway :prayer:

:banghead:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
133
Guests online
446
Total visitors
579

Forum statistics

Threads
627,096
Messages
18,538,242
Members
241,183
Latest member
MayBluebird
Back
Top