I want to raise an issue that may be pertinent in all discussions of police brutality.
Point prevalence of depression varies from one study to another (approximately 13% in many), but whatever it is, I have no reason to believe it is less in the police or the army.
Yet current attitude to diagnosing and treating mental illness in active duty cops and the military system is exceptionally restrictive.
What happens is, we give these people guns, train them, basically, give them license to protect the society, and effectively prevent them from any treatment of the same mental issues that we, civilians, take care of.
I think the problem in the police is not their (equal, I can bet, to any other societal stratum) rate of mental illness. I think it is the prevalence of untreated mental illness among them.
Looking at Chauvin, I can only guess what he has. My guess would be, alcohol abuse and possibly.
thyroid issues. But maybe something else caused his impaired judgment? Because morals aside, what idiot would be standing on the apprehended person’s neck, in full public view, for nine minutes, despite all witnesses taking videos?
Tao, who obviously enjoyed beating up arrested subjects.., what does it tell you?
And then, Kueng, am I not mistaken that he was the second one standing of Mr. Floyd?
Is it only their cruelty, or our restrictive policy, essentially, prohibiting police from seeking mental help that ends up in high indices of police brutality?
If we just view them as four rotten apples, it is bound to repeat again.