You ever just looked at a case, looked at the suspects, thought it through and and believed you knew as far as reasonably possible (no complete case file to read, only public info to review) who the perpetrator was? It appears that we have several thought processes working here with regard to potential suspects for the abduction of Jacob: DR, and then -- it seems some rarely mentioned suspects and/or some who cannot be named. It almost looks like thirds in our group -- a third lean towards DR as the perpetrator, a third lean towards an early unnamed suspect and a third lean toward -- having mixed feelings and thus leaning towards several possible culprits. You know, after twenty five years, it's beginning to look like we're dealing with a perpetrator who was exceedingly thorough in the execution of his abduction and disappearance of Jacob. This guy must be extra cagey and smarter than the average bear, because he's been able to outwit the FBI, BCA and all the rest for two and a half decades. Either that or he's just damn lucky. Can it really be this scoundrel committed the perfect crime -- perfect in that the best of the best have yet been unable to locate the evidence needed to charge someone? Apparently so.
Unless the abductor died soon after taking J. Or, unless he really wasn't from the area, as many infer. It really is difficult to believe no one has given another person a clue that this happened. Usually, someone talks. What if the abduction - just thinking outside the box - was a professional abduction for someone else?