Tinner007, one would think the FBI would know the type of shoe.
Are they perp prints?
How about this tire track...any insight??? I'm seeing an older un-belted, possibly a snow tire... Anyone familiar with tires?
View attachment 72587
How about this tire track...any insight??? I'm seeing an older un-belted, possibly a snow tire... Anyone familiar with tires?
View attachment 72587
I think it is very difficult to critique a book when the author is a long time poster on this thread. It is easier if you didn't know the author or have a personal relationship with them and could do it objectively. I applaud ELOC for getting more info out into the public, especially the info about Hollinger. I know if anyone would write a book about my family without being a family member or working with a family member, I would be highly suspicious of the motives, reason and be very nit-picky and biased. So many people have tried to hurt the family emotionally and financially- extortion, people claiming to be Jacob, etc. I don't blame them for having a thick wall.
Its a strange shoe, maybe a pair given to the rassier family of 8. Is it a dairy boot or shoe with slip resistance? Could these be monk issued apparel?
Yeh...how bout it? It was discussed eons ago....maybe you should read previous WS posts-just a suggestion. Sorry to be abrupt....but this has been discussed....Trackergd has made many posts regarding the available physical evidence of tire tracks/footprints.
The key word is "persistence".
So I was just doing some reading and saw this on a post from the group "Never Forget Me/"Bring me Home"
"It's gotten quicker, it's gotten more accurate and so its allowed us to do more with cases, although some people still seem to think you know if we did DNA testing back then there's nothing more we can do and that's not really true. We can do it with smaller samples, we can do a lot of different things, that's changed," Contra Costa County District Attorney Mark Peterson said.
Officials say DNA evidence pointed to Huff, but it was also extensive in-person interviews with him that led to the new charges.
---------------------
One of the cases they're referring to in which DNA testing was done occurred in 1987. So 30 years ago this man committed a murder (would not be his last one either), and while LE believed it was him, they wanted to do more testing, as well as further interviews to obtain more information.
Okay so now fast forward to 2010 -- apparently the technology five years ago was still insufficient to identify DNA on whatever items LE took from DR's farm.
Does LE have any other potentially incriminating information from sources that has not been told to the public? They named DR a POI. Has LE been withholding additional information? Would they even tell the public if they were?
I think it is very difficult to critique a book when the author is a long time poster on this thread. It is easier if you didn't know the author or have a personal relationship with them and could do it objectively. I applaud ELOC for getting more info out into the public, especially the info about Hollinger. I know if anyone would write a book about my family without being a family member or working with a family member, I would be highly suspicious of the motives, reason and be very nit-picky and biased. So many people have tried to hurt the family emotionally and financially- extortion, people claiming to be Jacob, etc. I don't blame them for having a thick wall.
DR says after he searched the buildings on the farm property and returned to the farmhouse, law enforcement was everywhere.
http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2013/...est-goes-through-day-of-wetterling-abduction/
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.