Concentric, there's much we don't know about what Josh knew -- for example, did one of Josh's friends have a bad experience with BW -- did Josh see or experience something. We know Josh was researching the statute of limitations regarding sexual abuse at St. John's -- what was his reason for doing that? Around 2002/2003 BW allegedly told someone he was "in love" with one of his students -- who was that student. Did anyone ever review missing males in other parts of the country and check to see if BW was in those locales at the time the young men went missing? Where was BW on the night Josh went missing? BW spent many, many years working on the grounds of St. John's -- he knew the place like the back of his hand -- could he have hidden some "trinkets" in those places? What about the cabins -- we know the monks regularly used them -- were they ever checked? To my knowledge the sheriff did none of this -- because, from day one, he operated under the premise that the abbey wasn't in any way connected to Josh's disappearance. How come so many others could see the possible connection, but the sheriff couldn't -- or wouldn't? If I could discern it from the beginning, surely he should have been able to -- and I didn't know a single thing about St. John's at that time ... so many unanswered questions, so many lies .... if you ever want to witness how the Guimonds were treated, search online for the meeting they had with the Stearns County board of supervisors -- just the most unfeeling, apathetic group of people -- truly a heartbreaking thing to behold