- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 9,748
- Reaction score
- 75,438
Reading the article that the head of the homicide unit testified of arriving upon baffling crime. I came away from reading that article with the interpretation that the detectives were not aware that Noor had shot this woman- the article says that Adkins was clueless as to how she was shot or who shot her: you mean to tell me Noor and his partner did not immediately say that Noor had shot her? I am stunned.
Why should the detectives be clueless about how and who shot this poor woman-shouldn't Noor have said something like, hey I didn't mean it, or i shot her but i didn't mean it: or his partner should have said something,.
To me it is outrageous that the detectives who arrived on the scene had no idea how this shooting occurred or who shot this woman. If I was on the jury that would not bode well for the defendant.
http://www.startribune.com/i-have-n...footage-reveals-chaotic-scene-as-medics-tried
Why should the detectives be clueless about how and who shot this poor woman-shouldn't Noor have said something like, hey I didn't mean it, or i shot her but i didn't mean it: or his partner should have said something,.
To me it is outrageous that the detectives who arrived on the scene had no idea how this shooting occurred or who shot this woman. If I was on the jury that would not bode well for the defendant.
http://www.startribune.com/i-have-n...footage-reveals-chaotic-scene-as-medics-tried