- Joined
- Jul 15, 2014
- Messages
- 31,035
- Reaction score
- 304,007
That is indeed what should happen. But we all know it won't.
At least they aren't reacting like after Renee's killing when they sent more troops.
jmopinion
That is indeed what should happen. But we all know it won't.
Seems like the message is to be a good guy with a gun (2A!)....unless you get killed by federal agents.Excuse me, how exactly? Alex had his gun holstered, the video footage makes it pretty obvious. The agents seemed unaware of the fact he was carrying, until they searched him. And, let me remind you, they searched him after they already pepper sprayed and tackled him. And that they shot him after they took his gun away.
So please, explain me, how did that invisible and then absent gun could play any role in their decision to shoot Alex.
MOO![]()
I am a strong proponent of our 2nd amendment rights and carry myself on a regular basis. It is disturbing to me how in this case, so many American citizens seem willing to say that simply legally possessing a firearm on your body can be reasonable incitement for a federal agent to shoot you. In my state, officers are trained and typically will not even ask you to remove your firearm during a regular stop. It’s a shame ICE seems to have received no such training, or even know what they are supposed to do when they encounter a civilian with a firearm. In my opinion, these officers are so untrained they are often acting from a state of panic, unable to remain calm and rational.Excuse me, how exactly? Alex had his gun holstered, the video footage makes it pretty obvious. The agents seemed unaware of the fact he was carrying, until they searched him. And, let me remind you, they searched him after they already pepper sprayed and tackled him. And that they shot him after they took his gun away.
So please, explain me, how did that invisible and then absent gun could play any role in their decision to shoot Alex.
MOO![]()
Or unless your political alignment is not the same as the current administration. MOO.Seems like the message is to be a good guy with a gun (2A!)....unless you get killed by federal agents.
jmopinion
In my opinion very little, if nothing at all actually, however, the presence of the firearm after he inserted himself in to the situation, in my opinion, played a part in the events that unfolded, and also, in my opinion, it was a poor judgement call on his behalf.
Exactly. I want info on their training. Noem has repeatedly said the agents are trained and are following procedures. Show us the training and procedures.What I find really distressing about the discussions around this shooting is the references to what Alex should have done to prevent his death. What about the ICE agents having some self control and risk assessment in the moment. Honestly, even if Alex wanted to use his gun (which IMO he almost certainly did not want to), he was already impacted by a face full of spray and pinned down by multiple ICE agents, not to mention his gun was also removed. He wasn't in any position to be a threat.
How anyone can continue to place blame on him is shocking, the presence of his gun is not what got him killed. It was either intentional violence or at the very least, complete incompetence at reasonably assessing a situation by ICE. And there is no excuse that can justify it i.e. it all happened quickly, or he had a gun so he was a threat that required many gun shots to contain.
I would love to see the recruitment processes for ICE agents, transparency around their training, criminal history checks, psychological testing, stress responses, etc etc etc. Watching footage of ICE agents scares me and I'm not even in the country - there is alot of aggression, anger and intimidation tactics on show. Either this is coming from within the agents (personality, etc) or they were told to act like this in training. Both are again inexcusable.
If only an ICE agent came forward, even anonymously, and shared what these agents were told in their training.
This is the part that makes it worse for me. I’m already outraged in the statements made by the POTUS and other high level members of his administration immediately after the incident - the lies, the victim blaming, etc. The fact that not ONE of them (not Trump, Noem, Miller, Bovino) has EVER said “this is a terrible loss of life, we are so sorry to the victims family” or anything remotely resembling an ounce of humanity, condolences or respect to the victim is truly chilling. It’s honestly abhorrent how our government continues to speak about this incident (and previous ones) with a complete lack of any humanity or decorum. Like, have we fallen that far? It’s mind boggling to me. All MOO.As the protesters have been saying, documentation is essential. We saw and heard what leadership said following the shooting of Alex Pretti.
Now would be the time to say, "We apologize, we were rash in our assessment after the incident, we take the situation seriously, and we are making changes so it won't happen again."
jmo
That Twitter post is riddled with lies. For a start, it begins disingenuously by giving the impression that he approached the agents giving the impression that he was armed. We know from the multiple videos that that is false."Does the president agree with them?" ABC News Chief White House Correspondent Mary Bruce asked Leavitt during Monday's press briefing.
"Look, as I've said, I have not heard the president characterize Mr. Pretti in that way," Leavitt said. "However, I have heard the president say he wants to let the facts in the investigation lead itself."
White House distances Trump from provocative claims by Noem, others on Pretti shooting
When asked for comment, the White House referred POLITICO to Trump’s Truth Social post and to a post on X from the Department of Homeland Security, which claimed, “The officers attempted to disarm the suspect but the armed suspect violently resisted.”
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/24/minneapolis-shooting-ice-trump-democrats-00745630
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115951636521315703
Exactly!Exactly. I want info on their training. Noem has repeatedly said the agents are trained and are following procedures. Show us the training and procedures.
Last night I watched a live stream of a protest in a Minneapolis suburb. The local police arrived and cleared the crowd. It took time, arrests happened, but nobody was shot or aggressively shoved. You could see the officers were trained and didn't go into a rage if people yelled at them.
There are ways to handle the public besides aggressively approaching people to shove, pepper-spray in the face, and shoot them.
jmopinion
MN won't infringe on people's human rights to enforce immigration law. They will follow the law, different than what you're saying.I have my doubts. The mayor of Minneapolis, Frey, already stated that he will not enforce federal immigration law - and this was after talking to the President.
Yes. When it's next to impossible to find fault with a victim, some will still find fault with a victim. It's hard for some, I understand, to find fault with authority, even as authority is now backstepping.Or unless your political alignment is not the same as the current administration. MOO.
My opinion. I never mentioned execution or murder, the two words being used at will in this thread without an investigation or charges being brought in any way shape or form.
My opinion. Hindsight watching videos and actions taken in the heat of a moment differ. You state killing someone is a last resort only if the person believes their life is at risk, interestingly I agree, and feel this point will be one of many considered in an investigation and any legal action taken regarding the agents involved.
Fact. I personally have 3 permits to carry a firearm, each issued from separate States here in the U.S. I have years of experience in the exercise of my 2nd amendment rights. I am extremely cognizant of firearms carry law and how it differs from state to state in the U.S. I am also aware of numerous other responsibilities that come along with the carrying of a deadly weapon on my person in public. This is why I say unfortunately, in my opinion, he exercised poor judgement that day.
In my opinion it's truly an unfortunate case. I don't think any agent left their home that morning with an intent or plan to kill. I'll await the results of the investigation(s). I am not an attorney, but I think there are many factors involved here, murder and execution not being on the table. If, however, those charges come to light, then the named agents surely should be held accountable.
A license to carry a firearm, or other terms used, a concealed carry permit, etc. does not give a person a "right to carry a gun wherever". There are restrictions, schools, courthouses, government buildings, bars, and numerous other locations, varying from state to state. So it's simply not true that a person in the U.S. as per the Constitution has a right to carry a gun wherever.
Just so we stay on the topic, Alex was in public, not at a university campus. Gun organizations, officials and experts have already stated he had every right to conceal carry.At public universities in our state all faculty, staff and students who carry have to leave their firearms in their cars, they are not allowed to bring their concealed carry into the buildings. At some of our state universities, the boards of trustees don't even allow cc to be left in their cars, they're not allowed on the campus grounds at all.
It's very odd to hear Kash Patel and others blame the victim for having a legal firearm--the same people who say, "Arm every teacher!" or "Only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun!!".![]()