MN - One dead after Minneapolis shooting involving immigration agents, US media report, January 24, 2026

[Inthedetails]

It’s a $25 fine, which they wave if you bring your current conceal carry ID down to the station with the violation.

Or get shot 10 times by agents who don't even know if you are carrying the ID or not.

jmopinion

 

[Summerliz03]

Do you admit that ICE does indeed have the authority to apprehend illegal immigrants in the area?

Sure, as long as they follow the law to do so.

 

[Inthedetails]

Sure, as long as they follow the law to do so.

If ICE wasn't terrorizing the communities and was truly targeting the "worst of the worst," there would be no protests.

Nobody wants dangerous criminals in their neighborhood. Nobody would protest their deportation.

jmopnion

 

[PrairieWind]

Can you point to the piece of legislation that demonstrates that he was not legally carrying, please?

To me, it seems like that only law he may have broken (if you believe the Feds) was failing to carry a piece of plastic. They haven't demonstrated that not doing that made his carry of the gun unlawful.

MS 624.714

 

[tlcya]

quite frankly, I don't know that the victim in this case DIDN'T have ID on him.

I only know that the same agency that lied to us about him assaulting agents and having plans to unleash maximum damage upon agents CLAIMS that is the case. I don't find that agency credible. JMO MOO IMO

And if perchance he did not have his ID on him, there is a penalty under the law that covers such a misdemeanor infraction, and it isn't death.

 

[PrairieWind]

If ICE wasn't terrorizing the communities and was truly targeting the "worst of the worst," there would be no protests.

Nobody wants dangerous criminals in their neighborhood. Nobody would protest their deportation.

jmopnion

Mobs have descended on ICE agents attempting to arrest criminal illegal immigrants. Since the mobs don't know who ICE is after, they should not be interfering.

 

[Inthedetails]

quite frankly, I don't know that the victim in this case DIDN'T have ID on him.

I only know that the same agency that lied to us about him assaulting agents and having plans to unleash maximum damage upon agents CLAIMS that is the case. I don't find that agency credible. JMO MOO IMO

And if perchance he did not have his ID on him, there is a penalty under the law that covers such a misdemeanor infraction, and it isn't death.

The penalty is not only execution on the street, it's a smear campaign against his character.

Desparate grasping for a reason to justify what the agents did. My opinion.

jmopinion

 

[PrairieWind]

Also ICE is immigration enforcement, they have nothing to do with gun permitting or making sure US citizens are carrying with proper documentation. So seems like they may have overstepped their duties there, to put it lightly.

ICE is there trying to do their jobs and mobs keep interfering. If people just videoed from the sidewalk etc there wouldn't be a problem.

 

[Summerliz03]

Mobs have descended on ICE agents attempting to arrest criminal illegal immigrants. Since the mobs don't know who ICE is after, they should not be interfering.

But in this case, they did know who ICE was targeting. He went into the donut shop and the owner locked the door and ICE was unable to come in. At that point, ICE should have left the scene and gone to get a judicial warrant or whatever they may have needed to apprehend their target. That’s literally their ONLY job. They didn’t do that. They pushed over 2 women and then shot a man in the back.

 

[Inthedetails]

dbm

 

[PrairieWind]

It's known that Hitler did have a habit when some of his military members were killed by resistance fighters he hit back harder. The actual event of Jews being rounded up in Rome in October 1943 was because 33 German soldiers were killed in a partisan attack. He demanded 10 Jews for every soldier killed. He massacred 335 civilians. He threw a couple more into the mix just because. It was called the Fosse Ardeatine massacre. So whether or not it was a phrase used specifically by Hitler it became part of his program to hit back harder.

What does this have to do with this case?

 

[nhmemorymaker]

<modsnip: Information stated as fact with no approved source to support>

It's my opinion that had he not been carrying that day, and had he not inserted himself when the woman was pushed down, he'd likely be alive today.

It's my opinion that an unfortunate chain of events transpired. I do not adhere to the notion that a Federal agent in this case committed 1st degree murder.

It's my opinion that no charges will be brought against the Federal agents in this case, however, if so, they will be lesser in nature, considering a litany of factors that came in to play that day.

again I see.... had he not inserted himself.

I reflect upon another case where "someone who inserted himself" was such a hero.

Republicans in Idaho have been criticized for “glorifying political violence” after the party hosted Kyle Rittenhouse, the American who shot and killed two people at an anti-racism protest and injured another, as a celebrity guest at a fundraiser.

The 20-year-old was the guest of honor at a Bonneville county Republican party event, in Idaho Falls, Idaho, on 15 April, where an AR-15 style rifle signed by Rittenhouse was auctioned off as part of a fundraiser and people could buy tickets to “Trigger time”: a Rittenhouse-hosted shooting event at a gun range.

Republicans ‘glorify political violence’ by embracing extreme gun culture

Kyle Rittenhouse, who shot and killed two people at an anti-racism protest, was guest of honor at Idaho Republican party fundraiser

www.theguardian.com

 

[Inthedetails]

ICE is there trying to do their jobs and mobs keep interfering. If people just videoed from the sidewalk etc there wouldn't be a problem.

So shooting a man 10 times after pepper-spraying and pinning him on the ground is justifiable?

I don't want to talk in circles, but get to the crux. Was the killing right?

jmopinion

 

[303gmf]

ICE is there trying to do their jobs and mobs keep interfering. If people just videoed from the sidewalk etc there wouldn't be a problem.

Mobs??
These are your fellow American citizens demonstrating, protecting others and witnessing facism that is terrifying to most of the planet of humanity

 

[Marantz4250b]

MS 624.714

Which part?

 

[kuromiiiilove]

If ICE wasn't terrorizing the communities and was truly targeting the "worst of the worst," there would be no protests.

Nobody wants dangerous criminals in their neighborhood. Nobody would protest their deportation.

jmopnion

And instead, 73.6% of those in ICE custody have NO criminal convictions. IMO they are targeting, not illegal immigrants, but immigrants trying to become citizens the ‘right’ way (by showing up at their hearings, etc. - https://www.axios.com/2025/12/23/trump-ice-green-card-interviews-immigration) because they are easier to track. They just want shock and awe.

https://tracreports.org/immigration/quickfacts/

 

[Marantz4250b]

ICE is there trying to do their jobs and mobs keep interfering. If people just videoed from the sidewalk etc there wouldn't be a problem.

It is not their job to summarily execute people who "interfere" with them.

 

[LAborn]

Of those 1.6 - 2.3% how many are the "worst of the worst" criminals we were promised ICE was targeting?

jmopinion

And the reality is immigration is a civil matter, not criminal. But for the sake of argument let's look at some stats Fact Check Team: Do illegal migrants commit more crime than American citizens?:

CATO Institute: Immigrants Are Incarcerated at Lower Rates Than U.S.-Born Citizens

To understand broader crime trends, the CATO Institute analyzed more than a decade of data from the U.S. Census and the American Community Survey.

Their 2023 incarceration rate findings:

• Native-born Americans: 1,221 per 100,000
• Illegal immigrants: 613 per 100,000
• Legal immigrants: 319 per 100,000
  
  

 

[sunshineray]

Of course. We can look at the end result and know that no one should have pulled the trigger. That much is obvious.

But, some see value in examining the events that occurred prior to the shooting in order to understand how it went wrong. Analyzing the events prior to the shooting does not equate with a statement that the shooting was justified.

A peaceful man recording. You see that man with a phone out standing still on the sidewalk and an aggressor gets up close and in his face, that agent backing off. The peaceful man then sees a peaceful fellow observer, a woman, being unnecessarily and violently pushed to the ground by an aggressor. He comes to her aid to help her up off the ground and becomes a target of all the agents for doing that. He's then swarmed by angry/violent agents, is disarmed and shot in the back, dead. There's an examination of the events. That's what my eyes saw clearly. AJMO

 

[Inthedetails]

And instead, 73.6% of those in ICE custody have NO criminal convictions. IMO they are targeting, not illegal immigrants, but immigrants trying to become citizens the ‘right’ way (by showing up at their hearings, etc.) because they are easier to track. They just want shock and awe.

https://tracreports.org/immigration/quickfacts/

And some of those who do have criminal convictions have been handed to ICE by Minnesota Department of Corrections (linked upthread).

jmo