MN - One dead after Minneapolis shooting involving immigration agents, US media report, January 24, 2026

  • #1,241
Another woman is facing charges after allegedly biting the finger of a federal immigration enforcement agent on Saturday in Minneapolis...

When the Border Patrol agent attempted to remove the mask Baierl was wearing, Baierl allegedly forcibly bit the middle finger on the agent’s right hand, the affidavit states.

The Border Patrol agent was wearing gloves at the time of the incident, but Baierl’s bite was still allegedly able to cause physical injury, the affidavit states.

Baierl was released from custody by a judge on her own recognizance. A preliminary hearing in the matter has yet to be set.

Glad he didn’t shoot her.
 
  • #1,242
The earlier incident started when he stopped his car after observing ICE agents chasing what he described as a family on foot, and began shouting and blowing his whistle, according to a source who asked not to be named out of fear of retribution.
https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/27/us/alex-pretti-protesters-minneapolis-invs

Since this article quotes unnamed sources I am not sure of its veracity, but IF Pretti had a prior contact with ICE in the weeks before his fatal encounter with federal LE, I am making a note that shouting and blowing a whistle would seem to constitute interference in the POV of some.
 
Last edited:
  • #1,243
  • #1,244
I agree with you here. I know a number of folks on this thread are clinging onto the "no ID". But WHO truly stated that.
If anyone can post articles or msm items that state this, would you please add here?
I, quite honestly, do not even know where it came from.
Noem stated it in her interview with Fox: https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/25/politics/trump-officials-shifting-rhetoric-alex-pretti

That is legitimately the only source (Noem/DHS) I can find of these claims. The police chief in Minneapolis said he was carrying legally - also in the linked article.

I will point out two lies from Noem she said in the same interview as claiming he had no id:
  • Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem claimed Pretti “attacked” officers, an assertion echoed by FBI Director Kash Patel, but no footage available as of Sunday afternoon shows Pretti committing any attack.
  • Noem claimed Pretti was “brandishing” a gun, but no available footage shows Pretti even holding a weapon in his hand at the scene; a concealed gun appeared to be taken from his waistband area by a federal agent moments before he was shot.
 
Last edited:
  • #1,245


"I can barely think of anything more beaten than spending the day typing variations on the theme of “it is good that law enforcement officers in my country shoot civilians who are no threat”. What a bunch of bootlickers. They might be too far gone to see it, but much of the rest of the world can."

Indeed
 
  • #1,246
News coverage of witness video at link

3 min ago

Newly obtained video shows what happened in the roughly 6 minutes leading up to Alex Pretti’s shooting​


A video obtained by the Associated Press shows what happened in the minutes leading up to when Alex Pretti was shot in an encounter Saturday with federal agents outside a donut shop in Minneapolis.


“The video does NOT capture any violent action by protesters or Pretti himself, and that’s contrary to some members of the Trump administration characterizing the scene. Several of them said it was a riot in which Pretti assaulted federal agents. Not true.”
 
  • #1,247
One of the things that unsettles me the most is how often people fall back on legality as if it settles the question. “Agents are just enforcing the law,” and “They shouldn’t have intervened.” Those phrases scare me.

Slavery was legal. Jim Crow was legal. Japanese internment was legal. The Nuremberg Laws were legal. Law does not protect morality. It reflects power.

What history judges is not whether something was legal, but whether people were willing to treat other human beings as expendable because the system told them it was acceptable.
 
  • #1,248
31m ago
Minneapolis mayor Jacob Frey said he told Trump’s border czar, that the city “does not and will not” enforce federal immigration law and urged an end to Operation Metro Surge “as quickly as possible”.

In a statement, Frey said he was joined by police chief Brian O’Hara for a “productive” meeting with Homan.

“I reiterated that my main ask is for Operation Metro Surge to come to an end as quickly as possible,” Frey said.

He continued: “I shared with Mr. Homan the serious negative impacts this operation has had on Minneapolis and surrounding communities, as well as the strain it has placed on our local police officers.

“I also made it clear that Minneapolis does not and will not enforce federal immigration laws, and that we will remain focused on keeping our neighbors and streets safe.”

Trump administration officials have repeatedly blamed so-called “sanctuary” laws for exacerbating tensions on the ground. Minneapolis, along with Hennepin County, restricts coordination between local law enforcement and federal immigration agents.

In a Wall Street Journal op-ed on Monday, the state’s governor, Tim Walz forcefully rebutted the administration’s claim that state prisons simply release the “worst of the worst” onto the streets.

“In reality, the Minnesota Department of Corrections honors all federal and local detainers by notifying Immigration and Customs Enforcement when a person committed to its custody isn’t a US citizen,” Walz wrote. “There is not a single documented case of the department’s releasing someone from state prison without offering to ensure a smooth transfer of custody.”

The Minnesota Department of Corrections has issued a statement, based on facts, that Minnesota turns over convicted criminals to Homeland Security/ICE...and Homeland Security claims those people as their own "arrests" while lying that MN is not cooperating.

Link to source: News Releases / Department of Corrections
 
  • #1,249
I get what you are saying, but I just can't see anything in the videos available that shows Alex getting in the way of ICE. Does anyone have footage that shows this? He was present when they went to the donut shop, but at what point did he step between them and their job? And when he went to help the woman pushed down, he still wasn't getting in the way of their operation. ICE pushed her to the ground, unless I'm mistaken there wouldn't have been any further need for ICE to interact with her therefore how was Alex interfering?

What I do see is ICE overreaching time and time again to interact with protesters and citizens that they have no business doing. IMO these interactions are because the ICE agents want to push their weight around, try to command authority and create fear. Their frustrations IMO clearly stem more from just their job title.
I see federal agents so determined to harass citizens that they did so while letting the person of interest to their so-called targeted enforcement get away.

Incompetence. Lethal incompetence.

MOO
 
  • #1,250
In all caps no less. A president of the United States said this and there was barely a reaction to it. That's where we are as a country.
Yes, I was wondering about reaction as I've never heard of a US president using that kind of language. Trump isn't a president like any who have gone before him in my lifetime.
 
  • #1,251
That is indeed what should happen. But we all know it won't.
It really does appear that these people just cannot get out of their own way imo.
They are trying to back pedal to change the optics bc of the bad polling - not bc thy have any shame how they have handled things.
Boy do we have a long way to go to get honesty and decency back in play - IMO
 
  • #1,252
One of the things that unsettles me the most is how often people fall back on legality as if it settles the question. “Agents are just enforcing the law,” and “They shouldn’t have intervened.” Those phrases scare me.

Slavery was legal. Jim Crow was legal. Japanese internment was legal. The Nuremberg Laws were legal. Law does not protect morality. It reflects power.

What history judges is not whether something was legal, but whether people were willing to treat other human beings as expendable because the system told them it was acceptable.

You are 100% correct that legal does not always make something right.

But- in these two killings it is not clear to me that the wrong actions the federal agents took were indeed taken legally.

MOO
 
  • #1,253
.
"DHS added that the suspect had two magazines on him, no identification, " You have to carry ID and the permit under MRS 624.714

This is clutching at straws.

The ICE searched him after they killed him.

If we look at the videos, he gave the ICE no reason to kill him whatsoever.
 
  • #1,254
Yes, I was wondering about reaction as I've never heard of a US president using that kind of language. Trump isn't a president like any who have gone before him in my lifetime.
You sure said it!! NEVER.
 
  • #1,255
  • #1,256
Question to everyone;

I read about Bovino - apparently, he held no official position of the head of border patrol.

He was “”commander at large" of the Border Patrol, a rank with no statutory basis”, so not officially heading anything, mostly doing a dirty job.

How can a person without an official position be deployed to Minnesota? In what capacity did he give orders?

So unless we know that the agents in Minneapolis were indeed, “border patrol”, removed from their positions to protect the border and brought to Minneapolis to deal with US citizens, I pause at calling them “border patrol”. We don’t know who they are. We don’t know where they worked before, so, ICE.

As long as their former boss had no statutory basis and yet was commanding the operation in Minnesota, where does it legally put the ICE/Border patrol group operating in Minnesota?

They took orders from a guy without official position, who inflated his personality by movies and all, but whose job had no name.

Did we have any such precedents?
 
  • #1,257
You are 100% correct that legal does not always make something right.

But- in these two killings it is not clear to me that the wrong actions the federal agents took were indeed taken legally.
I also believe they were both unjustified homicides and that arrests should've already happened.

I was responding to the many comments asserting that what happened was both legal and therefore justified. Even if someone believes these actions were lawful, legality alone has never been a reliable measure of what is right. History shows that over and over again.
 
  • #1,258
Whatever it is they should have been doing when the person they were chasing got away, I am 100% sure it wasnt passing the time by assaulting and executing citizens!
I read somewhere on here that the fugitive they were pursuing went in to the donut shop across from where Alex was murdered.
The donut shop would not let ICE in. Why didn't they just stake out the entrance and exit to the donut shop and wait for the dangerous dude?
Too logical ?
JMO
 
  • #1,259
I see federal agents so determined to harass citizens that they did so while letting the person of interest to their so-called targeted enforcement get away.

Incompetence. Lethal incompetence.

MOO

I would love to know if they ever did end up finding their target.
 
  • #1,260

Trump repeats claim Alex Pretti should not have been carrying a gun​

Even though Trump came to Iowa to try and shift focus away from the fallout in Minneapolis, he's asked several times about it.

Facing questions on a stop off before the rally in Des Moines, the US president repeated his claim that Alex Pretti should not have carried a gun.

He added:
"Certainly, he shouldn't have been carrying a gun. But all of us-hey, look, bottom line, everybody in this room, we view that as a very unfortunate incident. Everyone, unless you're a stupid person."

I'm sorry, what now? Alex was legally permitted to carry a handgun under Minnesota Law, so Trump saying he shouldn't have been carrying a gun but also insisting on Second Amendment rights is LUDICROUS. So everyone has the right to carry, but you shouldn't carry when law enforcement show up, how confusing and contradicting and an absolute grasp in trying to justify incompetence by the officers involved. jmo.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
170
Guests online
1,819
Total visitors
1,989

Forum statistics

Threads
638,824
Messages
18,733,662
Members
244,540
Latest member
deadlyaloeplant
Back
Top