- Joined
- Dec 2, 2022
- Messages
- 1,866
- Reaction score
- 7,779
Today marks 60 years since Dickie Huerkamp went missing.
Still, it's been too long. I'd really like to know what his sisters thought happened. jmoWell 59 years, not 60.
Today marks 60 years since Dickie Huerkamp went missing.
Still, it's been too long. I'd really like to know what his sisters thought happened. jmoWell 59 years, not 60.
Investigators will likely interview them in the course of their review of the case. None of the publicly available sources or newspaper articles quote either sister as to what they know. They were only about 11 and 12 at the time of Dickie's disappearance.Still, it's been too long. I'd really like to know what his sisters thought happened. jmo
RSBMSometimes when reviewing these old cases, it is interesting to see what other things were going on at the time and what was being heard on the radio.
Some good music in that list (imo)! Wonder what Dickie's favorite was?News items of 1965:
What Happened in 1965 inc. - Significant Events, Prices, 1965 Top Movies, TV and Music
1965 Prices with Wages, Houses and Gas, Toys, Fashions and Furniture, Vietnam - Operation Rolling Thunder, Race Riots Break Out In Watts, California, Northeast blackout including Parts of Canada and U.S. North East, Palm Sunday Tornado Outbreak, ...www.thepeoplehistory.com
Top 100 popular songs of 1965:
![]()
Billboard Year-End Hot 100 singles of 1965 - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
That would be wonderful, either way. I've wondered whether someone of the younger generation has heard or seen something through the years and is torn over whether and how to report it. That was a very small town. ... jmoIt is hunting season now. Perhaps some hunter will run across or remember new evidence applicable to this 50-year-old cold case.
Interesting. My family grew up with the Huerkamp kids as well. While so many tend to lean towards thinking he drown, my gut feeling upon hearing stories was always there was always something “off” about it all… it’s a small town, everyone knows everyone. Fascinating that you having grown up in Mapleton as well, have the same gut feeling…I just registered for this site. I lived a few blocks away from the Huerkamps. I remember Dickie as a loner. He rode his bike around the neighborhood alone, and we never saw him playing with friends. One might consider him a Special Needs child. My Mother always thought he was in an abusive family. My gut feeling is someone in the family knows what happened. I pray it is solved some day.
I just registered for this site. I lived a few blocks away from the Huerkamps. I remember Dickie as a loner. He rode his bike around the neighborhood alone, and we never saw him playing with friends. One might consider him a Special Needs child. My Mother always thought he was in a abusive family. My gut feeling is someone in the family knows what happened. I pray it is solved some day.
To be honest, I've often wondered whose idea it really was for Dickie to go hunting with those boys. His family had been living there for some time, so he wasn't invited along to "make the new kid feel welcome", imo. I rather get the impression the boys were either made to do it by their parents or it was meant to be a prank (they were going to tease him when they got him alone). Just my thoughts.Interesting. My family grew up with the Huerkamp kids as well. While so many tend to lean towards thinking he drown, my gut feeling upon hearing stories was always there was always something “off” about it all… it’s a small town, everyone knows everyone. Fascinating that you having grown up in Mapleton as well, have the same gut feeling…
... I rather get the impression the boys were either made to do it by their parents or it was meant to be a prank (they were going to tease him when they got him alone). Just my thoughts.
Do you remember which news article stated they were going goose hunting?Without access to the original case file which would contain witness statements, all we have to go on is newspaper accounts from 1965 and 1966.
Those reports tend to indicate that Dickie's parents were the ones who initially reported him missing, and provided the clues regarding his plans to go goose hunting with the other boys.
The boys' reported statements tended in some ways to corroborate the parents' story, in that they claimed to have gone to the Huerkamp home "about 5 am" and rang the door bell, but that nobody answered. They claimed, however, that they went north some 15 miles to go squirrel hunting - a very different sport than goose hunting.
Geese are usually hunted in open corn fields using full choke shotguns loaded with magnum shells containing large size shot. Squirrels, on the other hand, are hunted in woods using either a .22 rifle, or shotguns loaded with smaller shot.
Dickie was said to be very upset at having overslept, and immediately borrowed his sister's bike and left home with shotgun, shells, and lunch. His usual hunting area was 4 miles SOUTH of town, and that is where his bicycle and other items were found beside the road by his mother that afternoon.
Knowing the type of shells found with Dickie's bike would give insight to his intentions. Reviewing the other boys' statements and and re-interviewing them might resolve questions about their involvement and actions that day.
Did they really intend to hunt geese, and then changed their minds? Did they intend to go squirrel hunting all along? Did their stories match?
The Minneapolis Star began reporting on this case on Monday, 4 October 1965, and mentioned that Dickie had gone Goose hunting. Subsequent stories repeated the line that he had gone Goose hunting, and mentioned that the main search efforts were concentrated on/in the river.Do you remember which news article stated they were going goose hunting?
On 9 March 1965, Jim Klobuchar wrote a more in-depth follow up article ...
Great background on hunting and the relevancy to this case. Do you think the change from goose to squirrel hunting could be attributed to teens changing plans for one reason or another? It sounds like the boys came to Dickie's earlier than expected. That and a possible change of plans or miscommunication.Without access to the original case file which would contain witness statements, all we have to go on is newspaper accounts from 1965 and 1966.
Those reports tend to indicate that Dickie's parents were the ones who initially reported him missing, and provided the clues regarding his plans to go goose hunting with the other boys.
The boys' reported statements tended in some ways to corroborate the parents' story, in that they claimed to have gone to the Huerkamp home "about 5 am" and rang the door bell, but that nobody answered. They claimed, however, that they went north some 15 miles to go squirrel hunting - a very different sport than goose hunting.
Geese are usually hunted in open corn fields using full choke shotguns loaded with magnum shells containing large size shot. Squirrels, on the other hand, are hunted in woods using either a .22 rifle, or shotguns loaded with smaller shot.
Dickie was said to be very upset at having overslept, and immediately borrowed his sister's bike and left home with shotgun, shells, and lunch. His usual hunting area was 4 miles SOUTH of town, and that is where his bicycle and other items were found beside the road by his mother that afternoon.
Knowing the type of shells found with Dickie's bike would give insight to his intentions. Reviewing the other boys' statements and and re-interviewing them might resolve questions about their involvement and actions that day.
Did they really intend to hunt geese, and then changed their minds? Did they intend to go squirrel hunting all along? Did their stories match?
Great background on hunting and the relevancy to this case. Do you think the change from goose to squirrel hunting could be attributed to teens changing plans for one reason or another? It sounds like the boys came to Dickie's earlier than expected. That and a possible change of plans or miscommunication.
All excellent points. You're right in that we can only speculate, as we don't have access to the police reports. I sincerely hope the members of LE who now have custody of the files will take the case seriously and find Dickie.Any comment I make at this point regarding the other boys hunting plans and intentions has to be considered as speculation, since I have not seen the case file with their statements.
There are several possibilities. The other three boys were all older than Dickie and one drove the car they traveled in. They might or might not have stopped at the Huerkamp home for Dickie, although they later claimed to have.
They might have planned all along to drive 15 miles north to hunt squirrels - but if so, why such an early departure? Squirrels don't come out until after sunrise.
MAYBE Dickie was the only one who had permission to hunt the farmer's fields for geese, and the only one who knew the goose blind location. Not having him along, the other boys might have changed their plans from goose to squirrel hunting.
All reported information seems to indicate that it was Dickie's intention to ride a bicycle 4 miles SOUTH to a farm where he had previously hunted, for the purpose of hunting geese with the other boys. Did he meet up with them?
Newspaper reports state that the other boys claimed to have driven NORTH out of Mapleton (the opposite direction from where Dickie traveled), and that later, they returned to Mapleton. But then went southeast to the Minnesota Lake area for further hunting. This scenario means that they would have again come close to the Huerkamp home without stopping for Dickie and NOT going south near Dickie's hunting area.
Certainly some questions which beg answers.
Loop