My question has always been how do we know Dickie ever made it home that night after getting in trouble at the tavern? His mom’s comment is quoted saying she “gave him a licking” for staying out too long the night before. And while I can see getting grounded, I just find it odd “licking” a sophomore in high school. That’s farm country. Most 15 yr olds were plowing fields and had major responsibilities for livestock, etc. I just don’t see licking a sophomore, I see grounding him from going hunting with his friends… so back to my question, how do we know Dickie ever made it home from the tavern? Also, I have heard from several friends and acquaintances of the family that the dad was the one with the heavy hand that often caused people to wonder about him and Dickie…
The case file should have statements which might resolve your question. If he was out riding with friends, they may have stated where they left him off and when. Dickie's sisters might know more specifics regarding the case.
Dickie was a "townie" rather than a farm kid, so he did not have the responsibilities associated with farming. Although, he may have worked on farms during certain times, such as hay bailing in the summer. He was familiar with farms and farmers in the area. He often hunted on one farm and he had borrowed the shotgun of another farmer.
If Dickie met with foul play at home, then a pretty elaborate cover-up would have followed. Ann's bike, rather than Dickie's own bike would have to be transported and planted where it was found. A lunch would have had to have been made by someone else to be placed with the bike and supplies, and the borrowed shotgun disposed of along with Dickie's body and his hunting clothes. All of this would have had to have been accomplished within hours of Dickie arriving at the tavern. Of course, the whole family would have had to tell the same story to police.
The story about the time Dickie intended to get up and go with his buddies had to mesh with the actual plans of the boys, since they would be interviewed as well. The missing shotgun is a problem - more so if, indeed, the empty case was found with the bike.
IF the whole roadside scene was staged by his parents, consider a couple of possible scenarios which the perpetrators might have wanted police to believe :
- Dickie is riding the borrowed bike (only he would have known his own bike was inoperative) at 5 am in the dark when a predator pulls him over, kidnaps him and his shotgun, and then exits the scene.
- Dickie, the well-organized hunter who plans things out carefully and knows the area, simply dumps the bike, his lunch, gun case, and his shotgun shells at the side of the road and goes off hunting in the dark, accidently falling in the river to drown.
Neither scenario is very likely. At least not as a false coverup story to a murder which might have taken place in the home. Since Dickie's body was never found, those two possible scenarios become even less likely.
It is, however, very likely that the bicycle and hunting supplies were staged in an effort to mislead investigators and misdirect searchers away from the actual scene of Dickie's disappearance or death - probably within a mile of where they were found, in my opinion.