I’m new here, I hope it’s OK that I’m bumping this old post. I noticed a lot of people were following this case and I was wondering if my insights might be of any interest.
About 20 years ago, I worked for the same company as the killer. I didn’t know him well, but we had a close work friend in common, so he was around here and there.
Something never quite sat right with me about Darren, and I could never put a finger on what it was. Our mutual friend told me often that he was just shy.
Only after reading everything about this case that I could find, only after spending hours pouring through every brief I could locate. Only then was I able to realize what exactly it was that had bothered me about him so much.
He walked among us, but he was not one of us. He was studying everyone around him all the time. Trying to imitate what other people did. Trying to appear normal. And he fooled almost everyone. Frankly, I didn’t fully clock it until 20 years later, so obviously he was good at it.
Something was and is deeply, deeply wrong with that man. He was like a real-life version of Dexter. Observing everything, analyzing it, taking it all in, pretending to be present.
Anyway, the appeals in this case seem to be nearing exhaustion. The case is currently on the SCOTUS docket (23-6847). He is alleging that his religious beliefs or lack thereof were taken into account during sentencing, which is just simply not true when you read through the facts.
I didn’t see much in the way of summaries of the case when I was looking through this thread, probably because all of the documents at the lower court were sealed. But I’ve read through several hundred pages of docs from SCOTUS, the MO Supreme Court, and the Eastern District of MO court. I have a pretty full picture of what happened, and it’s horrifying.
Between what I remember about Darren and what I read in all those documents, I believe that he probably had longtime fantasies about murdering people, about being powerful. This is supported by the fact that he had previously pulled a gun on two different people at two different times (a former friend and a coworker, according to court documents) and by how self-deprecating he was and how inferior he obviously felt based on court docs.
Guy was obsessing over his girlfriend’s former husband, who had passed away from cancer about a year before he met her. Even while he was on the stand, testifying for his life, he made it a point to go on about how her husband was everything that he wasn’t. Why would you do that on the stand?
He testified that he “didn’t remember” many details about the argument he had with Kate (the victim) just before the murders, but he did remember her slapping him and telling him to get the




out of the house. He further testified how out of character that was for her.
I theorize, then, that he said something awful to her. Below the belt. Probably about her husband, the father of her children. I think it was in his mind that he needed to “punish” them for still loving their husband/father/son-in-law. I think the whole murder was about Kody and how inadequate Darren felt next to him.
It’s truly disgusting, no matter what his reasons were. Kate, Jane, Jonathan, and Zoe sounded like wonderful people with nothing but love in their hearts. I wish it was Kate that I had known instead of Darren.
As I said, I’m new here. So if I did anything wrong, please correct me! I really came just to talk about this case, but I will have a look around too. Also if I should post more details about the case, or where to find the documents, let me know. I have to warn you though, it’s deeply, deeply disturbing.