Great example! And therein lies the dilemma to work to improve race relations and socioeconomic relations.
Should we "zone" poverty (a euphemism for crime and undesirable behaviors) into ghettos like Canfield Green, to keep the undesirable elements away from law abiding, tax paying members? Or, do we integrate poverty into blended areas with subsidized housing? That very debate is raging where I live, as multiple attempts to put "low income and affordable" multifamily rental units near relatively high property value single family home neighborhoods. You can imagine the howls of NIMBY from property owners!
I don't honestly think most people care what income level a neighbor has-- it's the crime, disrespectful, and undesirable behavior they don't want.
In our area, a factory attracted a large number of immigrant workers to the area. Lots of people worried about crime moving in with the immigrants. The immigrant group moved families with kids, and has become a true value to the community, because their own values and behaviors were compatible. They are honest, law abiding, quiet, church going, and very engaged and hands-on parents.
It's an issue of attitude and behavior, and personal responsibility, not income or race, IMO. Diversity is not about law abiding citizens being forced to tolerate crime, disrespect, and disruptive behavior, and then called "racist" when they object to the behavior. That is not what diversity is all about. It's not about being forced to "hug a", to borrow that phrase from one of my fellow posters. That's not tolerance, either.
BBM: I think that sums it all up! Great post!