It is a huge problem when inaccurate information comes from LEO. You may not hold them to a higher standard than ordinary citizens, but I do.
I don't expect perfection, I have reasonable expectations.
It is a huge problem when inaccurate information comes from LEO. You may not hold them to a higher standard than ordinary citizens, but I do.
So, you can think of nothing substantial they add to the case. At least we are starting to find some common ground. Thanks!
As I have stated over and over again- real physical evidence weighed against witnesses' statements will change my mind. Second or third hand info or anonymous leaks will not. It is very simple. I always thought real evidence matters to us here? Not sure why someone wanting to see it is a bad thing?
It is widely accepted here that the cheif "goofed" a few times- the remarks about distance and OW not knowing about the robbery- then knowing, not sure why I'd accept vague second hand info as anything truly verifiable at this point. Rumours are flying in all directions- we do not know the truth of most of it.
And yes, when the new pics of OW came out, people were saying he still looked swollen and comparing them to how he had looked before as if they had seen them. Except how he looked that day, we really do not know- do we? I do not think we do.
MOO
1st BBM that itself is debatable and a matter of opinion not fact. I don't feel misinformed by the chief one little bit. Assuming that is a reference to the release of the convenience store video due to FOIA requests rather than a smear campaign.
2nd BBM we have also not seen pics of the actual shooting or the "scuffle" at the car and yet people seem to have very strong and deeply entrenched opinions on what happened there as well, from both sides of the debate.
fact=we have zero facts aside from the fact that an unarmed man was shot during some sort of confrontation with an armed police officer while that officer was on duty.
So the circular debate about which items should be seen as evidence and which should not is moot.
LOL - Change your mind from what?
Is this working for anyone?
Is this working for anyone?
Just like the highway shutdown was such a success![]()
Are there no live feeds on the inside?
Were they not able to get free tickets?
From not knowing what happened. I do not claim to know anything based on the paltry evidence we have so far.
You can feel free to base your judgments on second hand info and anonymous callers. To me, none of that is evidence. That is not something I am comfortable with.
I do not support these protests because they are now about everything including the kitchen sink, but will say this is a wise move on protesters part. :cow: But I do think it is a smart move by those organizing to take these protests to areas where those who they feel are not like them must be confronted by their "message"
They got some tickets. Tickets sell for 7 bucks on the day of the game, lol. So they went inside. But it is ILLEGAL to livestream from inside the game. Against Federal Broadcasting Regs and such. So they are all scattered around inside. Cant imagine what they expect to do inside with all that NFL security.
:thumbup:Hehe...Lovejac said:Nicholas J.C. Pistor@nickpistor
The only thing I see a lot of at this #rams game are #Cowboys fans. Haven't seen any displays referencing #Ferguson
This is such a JOKE. " We decided to be merciful and ALLOW THE RAMS TO PLAY..."
:floorlaugh:
You argue from an obvious point of view though. Gotta base that on something.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.