- Joined
- Sep 9, 2008
- Messages
- 6,547
- Reaction score
- 10,224
Oh my god does anyone have it on CNN right now. Holy <modsnip>this woman is going off.
I can say this with assurance - trying to invalidate people's experiences and emotions is a sure way to make people angrier.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Have you ever been in fear for your life and have to shoot at a huge moving target?
I thought people here were telling us that police are trained to shoot towards central mass. The head is central mass that needs to be shot at twice?
Oh my god does anyone have it on CNN right now. Holy <modsnip>this woman is going off.
He was 6'4 and just under 300#Wilson, the guy with the gun, was afraid of a kid with no gun? Please...
Oh my god does anyone have it on CNN right now. Holy <modsnip>this woman is going off.
Wilson, the guy with the gun, was afraid of a kid with no gun? Please...
I bet this is what Crump was bracing his audience for.
No, I am not watch CNN. Is she arguing about Dr Baden's results?
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/08/1...least-6-times.html?smid=tw-bna&_r=0&referrer=
One of the bullets entered the top of Mr. Browns skull, suggesting his head was bent forward when it struck him and caused a fatal injury, according to Dr. Michael M. Baden, the former chief medical examiner for the City of New York, who flew to Missouri on Sunday at the familys request to conduct the separate autopsy. It was likely the last of bullets to hit him, he said.
Mr. Brown, 18, was also shot four times in the right arm, he said, adding that all the bullets were fired into his front.
So there you have it, he was NOT shot in the back. It seems he was facing the officer and likely charging towards him. The initial bullets were to the right arm which apparently did not stop him.
(respectfully snipped)
There is another reason why the claim that it was released because of a FOIA request is, to put it politely, disingenuous: LE knows perfectly well that they do not need to release information like this during an open investigation. So claiming that it was because of the FOIA is hogwash.