My apologies, I wrongly assumed by the tone of your posts that you were of a particular opinion. There have been statements that have indicated potential legitimate reasons that caused the Officer to end Mike's life. You find none of that compelling? I do not know the extent of the Wilson's injuries for a fact, I do not know whether the woman who gave an account that allegedly came from Wilson himself as fact either. But I do know that the Chief of Police for STL County, not the Ferguson chief (Wilson's boss) said there was an altercation in the car and a shot was fired for a fact. So, perhaps the better question is, why are some people willing to give so much weight to three non-credible witnesses, but yet give none to the chief's statement and the fact that there isn't one wispy hint of impropriety known about Wilson? While those two things are not evidence, they're far more credible than anything we've heard to support excessive force, yet so few who make comments like "Mike needed killing" ever really acknowledge the weight of what has been presented. By the way, no one here has even hinted that Mike needed to die, deserved to die, etc. Why does defense of Wilson have to have some sinister hatred of Mike attached?
BTW, I have no idea what issue you are talking about, I only know two things that loosely relate. One, grinding an axe from elsewhere here isn't the way to go. (See my infractions file, I learn lessons the hard way sometimes...love you Fran and Kimster!) Two, I'm a zero tolerance zealot for crimes like rape and murder of children, you'll find few people less sensitive to the rights and regard for these animals who steal the innocence of youngsters. Permanent incarceration in a medical facility for the insane and execution of the simple freaks. So, I'm all in on whatever you are referring to. Just don't think it is related in any way, shape or form to the discussion of this case.
we had a long talk
