I think the point is - since there is no video, none of us can make judgements about what did or did not happen, what may or may not have happened.
I have to say that I am very disappointed in that I keep reading posts which claim things (that went on between Wilson and MB) as facts, without giving any links for any kind of proof. Are some people privy to more information than others? If so, I would like to also see this information, whatever that is.
For example, many people stating as fact that MB reached into the vehicle and assaulted Wilson - is there any proof to back this up, or are people just claiming it's fact because of the radio caller who called in to tell Wilson's side of the story? So just because Officer Wilson or someone from his camp says it's true, that makes it true?
I am getting very confused by all of this. If it's not proveable fact, can posters please add JMO or something like that to their posts, so that we know what is fact and what is not? TIA.
(ETA 1. oops, copied wrong thing from my clipboard...
ETA 2. OK, found them and fixed post)
Here are the relevant citations :
Early statements by Chief Belmar
Belmar said at a news conference on Sunday that when Wilson got out of his squad car, Brown pushed him back in, and a struggle ensued.
Belmar said the incident started when Brown physically assaulted the police officer, pushing him into the officer's vehicle.
He said there was a struggle inside the car, and at some point Brown reached for the officer's weapon. One shot was fired inside the vehicle.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/18/ferguson-darren-wilson-account-michael-brown-shooting
Belmar says Brown physically assaulted the officer, and during a struggle between the two, Brown reached for the officer's gun. One shot was fired in the car followed by other gunshots outside of the car.
http://www.ksdk.com/story/news/crim...olice-news-conference-michael-brown/13860601/
And...
JMO, but if the chief was "wrong" when he announced that MB physically assaulted Officer Wilson and went after his gun, then when the Brown family's attorney, Parks, was asked about it, he would have had much different answers than these:
To Nancy Grace:
Parks: "Nancy, without question, there was some level of interaction, strong interaction, between the officer and Michael at the car. We don't deny that, Daryl Parks, attorney for Browns family said Monday night.
I think as evidence comes out, you'll see and hear more of that. But that`s not what killed him.
http://www.hlntv.com/video/2014/08/18/michael-brown-shooting-autopsy-fight-car
Same basic admission when Megyn Kelly asked few nights ago, but with a "blow" thrown in:
Parks: "In all due fairness, at the very beginning, at the car, there was a very serious situation between Michael and the officer, without question, in which there may have been blow-they had an altercation.
And at some point, the officer's gun may have come out and a shot's fired."
http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/the-kelly-file/index.html#/v/3739124713001
I'm sorry, but imo, if the Browns' attorney himself believed MB didn't physically assault officer Wilson, he would not have answered this way.