CHERIE.T
Former Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2012
- Messages
- 8,281
- Reaction score
- 38
Just reading through twitterland today. Apparently, the new defense of VM is based upon the cop not being in uniform, but rumored to be in a security guard uniform, And if 3 teens run away from his he should ignore it, thats not against the law. So no matter that the kid was illegally armed while out on bond, and fired on the cop, ---its the cops fault for following them.
The funny/sad part is, if the 3 teens had just calmly walked past, eaten their sandwiches, this whole thing could have been avoided.
These folks fail to see that the kids should have taken responsibility for actions. Uniform or not that LEO had a right to defend himself and shoot.