MO - Sherrill Levitt, 47, Suzie Streeter, 19, & Stacy McCall, 18, Springfield, 7 June 1992 #13

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #461
  • #462
So what's left? I've never thought this crime was done by a random stranger. It just seems like there was something going on that night, that caused the girls to change their plans more than once. And if the APCO sighting of Sherrill is true, then there may be some credence to something going south that night, that caused Suzie or someone else to call Sherrill, who intern went out looking for them.
I've also wondered about the eyewitness account of the cars being parked differently early in the morning hours, than they were found to be parked later that day.
Do you think the brother was capable of this crime? I've often wondered about him as well. He has a very sorted past, and definitely would have been pissed off that his mom and sister disowned him, as has been said. He also left Springfield three months into the investigation, never to return. And there is also his recent arrest, as well as his history of alcohol abuse.
I wonder how solid his alibi really was. Not blaming/accusing, just curious.

I really don’t think the person that did this has been talked about. I don’t think Bartt had anything to do with it.
 
  • #463
May be no one was worried about Dusty or your husband snitching on them. But they were when it came to Suzie and/or her mother.
For what? Victim blaming, much?
 
  • #464
I really don’t think the person that did this has been talked about. I don’t think Bartt had anything to do with it.
Well, who deserves mention that hasn't been so far? I was three when this took place. I'm more than ready to hear the truth. I have no idea, so this may come as a surprise.
 
  • #465
Slightly off topic, but I’ve always found it bizarre there are so few readily available pictures of the grave-robbers online. Other suspects/“POIs” — in this case, and others, seem to have them in a instant with a casual search.

Obviously this is of no importance, just unusual.
 
  • #466
Well, who deserves mention that hasn't been so far? I was eight when this took place. I'm more than ready to hear the truth. I have no real idea, so this will come as a surprise, perhaps.

I have no idea. I just don’t think the person that did it has been talked about because the usual suspects have been talked about to nauseam for years and it has gotten no where.
 
  • #467
With that logic I would think Joe would be the biggest target since he was the reason they were caught since he talked at a party. Also Dusty and Joe were at the police station far more. Suzie was there one time.

*edit to clarify. Suzie was there once for the statement, but was also there the day before to pick up Dusty. That is when Dusty told Suzie about the vandalism.

May I ask, how it is that you definitively know that Suzanne and/or Mrs. Levitt was at SPD PD only one time? Can you also state with accuracy how many times a PO may have spoken with either at their residence? Who called CrimeStoppers?

TIA
 
  • #468
May I ask, how it is that you definitively know that Suzanne and/or Mrs. Levitt was at SPD PD only one time? Can you also state with accuracy how many times a PO may have spoken with either at their residence? Who called CrimeStoppers?

TIA

If in regards to Mike, Dusty, or Joe it would be in the file. Suzie is only mentioned that she picked up Dusty the first day Dusty was brought in because it says he called her to pick him up. Then mentioned again as to how she was brought in for the statement. Sherrill is not in the file at all. It has every time they went to anyone’s house in the file and it is never mentioned that they went to Sherrill or Suzie’s house.

*edited to add. They do not use names in crime stoppers reports. It is anonymous. The only name mentioned is the officer that took the call.
 
  • #469
  • #470
For what? Victim blaming, much?
Oh give it a rest already. No one is "Victim Blaming" for the love of pete. It's a theory, nothing more, nothing less.
 
  • #471
May I ask, how it is that you definitively know that Suzanne and/or Mrs. Levitt was at SPD PD only one time? Can you also state with accuracy how many times a PO may have spoken with either at their residence? Who called CrimeStoppers?

TIA
Yes I would love to know who called CrimeStoppers. I think it was Suzie! MOO
She was after all at Dusty’s party on Marlan, the one where Joe ran his mouth. Wonder what else could’ve been said at this party.
 
  • #472
Oh give it a rest already. No one is "Victim Blaming" for the love of pete. It's a theory, nothing more, nothing less.
For the love of God get a grip. Let's not call everyone drug addicts with no proof. Thanks!
 
  • #473
Yes I would love to know who called CrimeStoppers. I think it was Suzie! MOO
She was after all at Dusty’s party on Marlan, the one where Joe ran his mouth. Wonder what else could’ve been said at this party.

In Suzie’s statement she said she found out on March 4. That is the same day Dusty made his statement. Suzie and Joe made their statements on March 5.
 
  • #474
December 31, 1992 america most wanted received a call from Florida . The call
Was disconnected while being transferred .
The caller was said to have “ prime knowledge” .

Who was in Florida in December or how did they receive what SPD defines as prime knowledge of the crime ? That indicates some details, the public did not know .
 
  • #475
December 31, 1992 america most wanted received a call from Florida . The call
Was disconnected while being transferred .
The caller was said to have “ prime knowledge” .

Who was in Florida in December or how did they receive what SPD defines as prime knowledge of the crime ? That indicates some details, the public did not know .
What does that mean?
 
  • #476
For the love of God get a grip. Let's not call everyone drug addicts with no proof. Thanks!
Never called anyone a drug addict. I said that they may have had knowledge of drug activities. Please quit being so hyper-reactive, before you get your facts straight.
 
  • #477
Never called anyone a drug addict. I said that they may have had knowledge of drug activities. Please quit being so hyper-reactive, before you get your facts straight.
Excuse my hyper-reactiveness. Maybe you should fact check before making accusations. What makes you thing they had knowledge of drug activities? The cops went over and over Suzie and her mom’s backgrounds. So unless you have something new you are slandering.
 
  • #478
Excuse my hyper-reactiveness. Maybe you should fact check before making accusations. What makes you thing they had knowledge of drug activities? The cops went over and over Suzie and her mom’s backgrounds. So unless you have something new you are slandering.
Gee, Suzie dated Dusty. Enough Said. I never said she was "Involved In It", I said she could have had knowledge of things others were doing. I've slandered no one. Good Night.
 
  • #479
I really don’t think the person that did this has been talked about. I don’t think Bartt had anything to do with it.
your husband met Steve Garrison more than one time and he keeps downplaying it!
maybe if he stopped playing games and talked more about those times meeting him insteAd of dismissing it as nothing we could see progress.......he could help but you recruit foot soldiers like Cherrymeg to help pedal your bs! You’ll be exposed soon!!
 
  • #480
Gee, Suzie dated Dusty. Enough Said. I never said she was "Involved In It", I said she could have had knowledge of things others were doing. I've slandered no one. Good Night.
haven’t you caught on to Cherry Meg yet? She’s just an extension of Clays..... repeats everything they say as truth then throws false accusations around on janelle and others and Clay doesnt even call Her out.... (wonder why)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
103
Guests online
1,779
Total visitors
1,882

Forum statistics

Threads
632,165
Messages
18,622,979
Members
243,041
Latest member
sawyerteam
Back
Top