perkinwarbeck
~ revenant ~
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2019
- Messages
- 29
- Reaction score
- 165
There was the recent TN arrest and then another in NV in 2000.
So what's left? I've never thought this crime was done by a random stranger. It just seems like there was something going on that night, that caused the girls to change their plans more than once. And if the APCO sighting of Sherrill is true, then there may be some credence to something going south that night, that caused Suzie or someone else to call Sherrill, who intern went out looking for them.
I've also wondered about the eyewitness account of the cars being parked differently early in the morning hours, than they were found to be parked later that day.
Do you think the brother was capable of this crime? I've often wondered about him as well. He has a very sorted past, and definitely would have been pissed off that his mom and sister disowned him, as has been said. He also left Springfield three months into the investigation, never to return. And there is also his recent arrest, as well as his history of alcohol abuse.
I wonder how solid his alibi really was. Not blaming/accusing, just curious.
For what? Victim blaming, much?May be no one was worried about Dusty or your husband snitching on them. But they were when it came to Suzie and/or her mother.
Well, who deserves mention that hasn't been so far? I was three when this took place. I'm more than ready to hear the truth. I have no idea, so this may come as a surprise.I really don’t think the person that did this has been talked about. I don’t think Bartt had anything to do with it.
Well, who deserves mention that hasn't been so far? I was eight when this took place. I'm more than ready to hear the truth. I have no real idea, so this will come as a surprise, perhaps.
With that logic I would think Joe would be the biggest target since he was the reason they were caught since he talked at a party. Also Dusty and Joe were at the police station far more. Suzie was there one time.
*edit to clarify. Suzie was there once for the statement, but was also there the day before to pick up Dusty. That is when Dusty told Suzie about the vandalism.
May I ask, how it is that you definitively know that Suzanne and/or Mrs. Levitt was at SPD PD only one time? Can you also state with accuracy how many times a PO may have spoken with either at their residence? Who called CrimeStoppers?
TIA
There was the recent TN arrest and then another in NV in 2000.
Oh give it a rest already. No one is "Victim Blaming" for the love of pete. It's a theory, nothing more, nothing less.For what? Victim blaming, much?
Yes I would love to know who called CrimeStoppers. I think it was Suzie! MOOMay I ask, how it is that you definitively know that Suzanne and/or Mrs. Levitt was at SPD PD only one time? Can you also state with accuracy how many times a PO may have spoken with either at their residence? Who called CrimeStoppers?
TIA
For the love of God get a grip. Let's not call everyone drug addicts with no proof. Thanks!Oh give it a rest already. No one is "Victim Blaming" for the love of pete. It's a theory, nothing more, nothing less.
Yes I would love to know who called CrimeStoppers. I think it was Suzie! MOO
She was after all at Dusty’s party on Marlan, the one where Joe ran his mouth. Wonder what else could’ve been said at this party.
What does that mean?December 31, 1992 america most wanted received a call from Florida . The call
Was disconnected while being transferred .
The caller was said to have “ prime knowledge” .
Who was in Florida in December or how did they receive what SPD defines as prime knowledge of the crime ? That indicates some details, the public did not know .
Never called anyone a drug addict. I said that they may have had knowledge of drug activities. Please quit being so hyper-reactive, before you get your facts straight.For the love of God get a grip. Let's not call everyone drug addicts with no proof. Thanks!
Excuse my hyper-reactiveness. Maybe you should fact check before making accusations. What makes you thing they had knowledge of drug activities? The cops went over and over Suzie and her mom’s backgrounds. So unless you have something new you are slandering.Never called anyone a drug addict. I said that they may have had knowledge of drug activities. Please quit being so hyper-reactive, before you get your facts straight.
Gee, Suzie dated Dusty. Enough Said. I never said she was "Involved In It", I said she could have had knowledge of things others were doing. I've slandered no one. Good Night.Excuse my hyper-reactiveness. Maybe you should fact check before making accusations. What makes you thing they had knowledge of drug activities? The cops went over and over Suzie and her mom’s backgrounds. So unless you have something new you are slandering.
your husband met Steve Garrison more than one time and he keeps downplaying it!I really don’t think the person that did this has been talked about. I don’t think Bartt had anything to do with it.
haven’t you caught on to Cherry Meg yet? She’s just an extension of Clays..... repeats everything they say as truth then throws false accusations around on janelle and others and Clay doesnt even call Her out.... (wonder why)Gee, Suzie dated Dusty. Enough Said. I never said she was "Involved In It", I said she could have had knowledge of things others were doing. I've slandered no one. Good Night.