- Joined
- Dec 21, 2006
- Messages
- 2,490
- Reaction score
- 1,581
Newsleader said other things that you dismiss (Garrison with prime info) so how do you discern which is real or fake? respectively asking..,
What is this so-called prime info?”
Newsleader said other things that you dismiss (Garrison with prime info) so how do you discern which is real or fake? respectively asking..,
His buddy bragged about killing the women at a party.. the details the guy gave proved he had something related to the women that public wouldn’t know aboutWhat is this so-called prime info?”
Smyrna TN was Bartt’s incident last year......Just doing some research on Garrison and I ran into a news site that discussed an alleged attempted abduction in Smyrna, Tennessee. It was dated March 2, 2019.
May be worth a look-see. I don’t know how to link it. It can be found at WKRN.com.
On another seemingly unrelated clue is the fact that the dog was a Yorkshire Terrier. Anyone who has ever owned one of these also knows they have a very distinctive trait. They are persistent barkers and would have gone bonkers if the intruder was unknown. I had one for a couple of months. Although it was an otherwise fine dog, the incessant barking and inability to be walked led us to return it to the rescue organization. It seems obvious to me that the intruder had to be known by the dog, unless it was confined when the intruder arrived.
Good points. Also, what if someone called Sherrill, from one of the parties, and said they're not here yet? Maybe they didn't make it to one of those parties. Sherrill may have found them endangered elsewhere. Would this cause a disruption in the commonly believed time frame?I wonder why Sherril would be running around looking for her daughter. Didn't Suzie tell her she would be staying at the Kirby's house that night?
what if the person who had been casing the house for days called to get her out of the house and then check the house out while she was gone ? and also to retrieve Suzie by faking she was in trouble so she would go retrieve herGood points. Also, what if someone called Sherrill, from one of the parties, and said they're not here yet? Maybe they didn't make it to one of those parties. Sherrill may have found them endangered elsewhere. Would this cause a disruption in the commonly believed time frame?
Which person?what if the person who had been casing the house for days called to get her out of the house and then check the house out while she was gone ? and also to retrieve Suzie by faking she was in trouble so she would go retrieve her
The one Bookkeeper mentioned in her posts...the one that had been in the neighborhood casing the house...Which person?
Really?Just doing some research on Garrison and I ran into a news site that discussed an alleged attempted abduction in Smyrna, Tennessee. It was dated March 2, 2019.
May be worth a look-see. I don’t know how to link it. It can be found at WKRN.com.
On another seemingly unrelated clue is the fact that the dog was a Yorkshire Terrier. Anyone who has ever owned one of these also knows they have a very distinctive trait. They are persistent barkers and would have gone bonkers if the intruder was unknown. I had one for a couple of months. Although it was an otherwise fine dog, the incessant barking and inability to be walked led us to return it to the rescue organization. It seems obvious to me that the intruder had to be known by the dog, unless it was confined when the intruder arrived.
He knows exactly what he's doing.Smyrna TN was Bartt’s incident last year......
I agree that the McCall’s are why most of us know about this case. That they used their tragedy to help other families is admirable. I think their strength inspired LE but their grief made them uncomfortable. I don’t think the McCall’s did anything wrong and investigators are only human but it was LE’s job to steer the investigation. Painting Stacy as the sole victim in the wrong place at the wrong time and ignoring inconsistencies hasn’t been helpful.Im from the area and the McCalls involvement is why you and I even know about the case...Janis fighting for it to be in the spotlight is putting the pressure on SPD...
I think analyst was correct.. he’s independent of SPD and he said the perp knew comings and goings. Case is solved..bodies are needed to go further.. that’s why the parking garage crap was ignored...and other theories and leads are ignored....they already know who did it (JMO)
if perps knew comings and goings, it suggests Levitt home was Target, and thus the home’s occupants were targets
Good points. Also, what if someone called Sherrill, from one of the parties, and said they're not here yet? Maybe they didn't make it to one of those parties. Sherrill may have found them endangered elsewhere. Would this cause a disruption in the commonly believed time frame?
I’m pretty sure you’re only speaking of Asher and that’s because of his personal beef with Bartt...don’t see proof of Stacy favoritism otherwise and media coverage isnt comparable to actual behind the scenes of investigation anyways...imoI agree that the McCall’s are why most of us know about this case. That they used their tragedy to help other families is admirable. I think their strength inspired LE but their grief made them uncomfortable. I don’t think the McCall’s did anything wrong and investigators are only human but it was LE’s job to steer the investigation. Painting Stacy as the sole victim in the wrong place at the wrong time and ignoring inconsistencies hasn’t been helpful.
I missed the solved alert but if it was no one would be here to speculate or force theories.
Really?
Research on Garrison? Come on man !!
He knows exactly what he's doing.
I’m pretty sure you’re only speaking of Asher and that’s because of his personal beef with Bartt...don’t see proof of Stacy favoritism otherwise and media coverage isnt comparable to actual behind the scenes of investigation anyways...imo
doug Thomas was sole investigator on the case from late 1992 to late 90s. Mike Owen,, Culley Wilson, Scott Hill since then...no proof they showed victim favoritism......
Garrison and his friends being the subject of the GJ doesnt make them suspects in the crime.....it COULD (it is imo) be that they have info the police seek on suspects,..
As far as Asher goes...his investigative skills, cognitive abilities, personal beefs, blah blah dont matter...all that matter is the facts. And just because one doesnt like him as a person,, doesnt mean what he said was wrong. Important to distinguish....especially since other detectives have taken lead since him...and new info presented itself post-Asher..
rregarding Stacy favoritism topic: thats because the Streeters didnt go to the forefront of the media as much until recent years. Ms McCall canvassed the streets, begged for media air time, started One Missing Link...etc etc to keep the public looking for her daughter.. Bartt was considered a suspect (wrongfully, true) but thats why it's harder for him to do the same thing as McCalls (wont pass judgement there) but Debbie Schwartz, Cliff (in early days), Brentt, Don Levitt etc. didnt do the media attention-grabbing things Janis did...so the distorted view of the case is affected by that...imo
It's entirely possible they looked into the van and found owner and clarified that it wasnt part of the case or suspicious....,What you say is likely true. What I don’t understand is why on the “48 Hours” program he stated (paraphrasing) he had nothing to work the case from.
I know the police were interested in the van. I was on the seventh floor of the state office building and observed a similar van pulling into the adjacent parking lot. Thinking it would be of interest to the SPD and I called the SPD. Evidently they were because a car of plain clothed detectives arrived in about five minutes. They got out and looked it over including using flashlights to look inside the cargo area. Evidently didn’t find what they were looking for and soon left.
My experience a few weeks later was highly troubling. I was turning left at the “tuning fork” on Jefferson when I observed an identical van but painted blue. I traveled on to drop off my wife and saw a passing police cruiser. I gave him the information and he took off in hot pursuit.
It was later when I had additional information that were volunteered to me that I wished to pass along. That is when the confrontation took place. I asked numerous police officers if that was normal police procedure and none thought it was normal. To this day over 26 years , I still do not understand why that happened.
I later reported the complete incident to Lt, Headlee about 10 years ago. Nothing that I know of came of it.