I don't understand. It se as though she researched "how to disappear" on her computer. Then did just that. Why does this case keep going on when others that really ARE missing can't get any attention? I just don't get it.
JMO
JMO
I don't understand. It se as though she researched "how to disappear" on her computer. Then did just that. Why does this case keep going on when others that really ARE missing can't get any attention? I just don't get it.
JMO
I don't understand. It se as though she researched "how to disappear" on her computer. Then did just that. Why does this case keep going on when others that really ARE missing can't get any attention? I just don't get it.
JMO
As I mentioned above, I actually DO see an accident as being as likely of an explanation as her being assaulted. I live in a rural area and while it's not average, by any means, it's certainly not unheard of for wrecks and missing persons to be discovered months and years after the fact.
The thing that I think is really strange about the police theory, though, is that they are publicizing that hypothesize. To me, that seems unconventional. Unless you've found evidence that there was a collision or have some other sort of circumstantial info that points to an accident, I don't know why you would publicly lean toward that conclusion over another.
Unless they are trying to mislead a perp in some way.
The accident theory has always seemed silly to me. The weather wasn't that bad that morning (I was out in the Northland during the same time frame).
In addition, I've heard "she was fatigued and in an unfamiliar area" which seems strange to me. If you work at a club, and are used to those hours, being out driving between 4-6am isn't going to be difficult for you. As a person that works nights I'm out all the time between 2-7am driving. Also, she posted previously that she enjoyed driving during those times.
Anyway, is an accident possible? Absolutely. I just don't think it's the most likely cause of her disappearance.
Sent from my Z981 using Tapatalk
Toni told the police officer about the Shady Lady. We don't know if she said coming, going, friend or friends to him. It is my understanding the friends, which friends I down know, said there was not a plan to meet.
At the end of the day she was last seen no where near the Shady Lady.
Her where abouts certainly open up speculation.
If the police feel there was an accident then why not ask the public to be on the look out for anything out of the ordinary on roads??!!
If this is their determination, why no searches anywhere near gps or pings??!!
I understand police only have so much man power to focus on this but what about friends, family, the public??!!
This case is just so frustrating!
Can someone remind me exactly where the police searched again with sonar and equipment.
Was this reported or mentioned on Facebook? I'd like to relook at exactly the area where police used drones and sonar and swept the river. I can't find it anywhere. Help!
I don't understand. It se as though she researched "how to disappear" on her computer. Then did just that. Why does this case keep going on when others that really ARE missing can't get any attention? I just don't get it.
JMO
Toni told the police officer about the Shady Lady. We don't know if she said coming, going, friend or friends to him. It is my understanding the friends, which friends I down know, said there was not a plan to meet.
At the end of the day she was last seen no where near the Shady Lady.
Her where abouts certainly open up speculation.
If the police feel there was an accident then why not ask the public to be on the look out for anything out of the ordinary on roads??!!
If this is their determination, why no searches anywhere near gps or pings??!!
I understand police only have so much man power to focus on this but what about friends, family, the public??!!
This case is just so frustrating!
I think if someone were truly trying to disappear, somewhere in their research would be the advice to cover your tracks and leave no evidence that you're trying to disappear.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Snipped
Just about everyone in this case is being deceptive, including Law Enforcement imo
Just about everyone in this case is being deceptive, including Law Enforcement imo
LE would give non specific info or no info if she was, in fact, a CI in any regards.Here's somethings I would like to know. Liz Anderson stated in an interview that they or she was 99 percent sure Toni didn't have a car accident. Liz tells us she thinks Toni was taken and it is Human Trafficking. Thing is as far as I know the FBI are not involved in Toni's case at this time and isn't the FBI who would investigate Human Trafficking? In the last interview by the Kansas City Star the reporter writes that LE feels Toni had a car accident and was in an area she did not know and is wrecked on a desolate road. They say they have searched extensively but have not found Toni. They also say she could be a victim of foul play but they have no evidence of that. They'll keep investigating for foul play.
We have no more searches by Toni's friends, boyfriend or LE. There has been problems between friends of Toni's and even accusations of involvement in Toni going missing. Is this normal in this kind of case? One friend that was very involved doesn't seem to be involved any longer, very strange.
If LE thinks it's very likely Toni is out on some desolate rd, why wouldn't her boyfriend and friends be looking, searching every day, Corridor 9.
Would Law Enforcement give false details to the public in a case like this?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.