MSM coverage of Baby Lisa, 11/9/11

[cityslick]

M Kelly: DB's phone called MW's phone at 11:37 PM

Mark Fuhrman: ...now DB has shown that she wanted to distance herself from the phone call. If 11:57, this is the period of time that Deb is drunk, maybe "blacked out..."

Why is MF talking like this information is coming directly from DB?

 

[Cortne]

That is true that when you are 'restricted' the outgoing calls go right to the payment center. [ except for 911 calls]

HOWEVER, they had two phones and only one would have been restricted. The other one can work normally when your account is on restriction. Only the primary phone, the account holders phone is affected.

I use Verizon. I shorted my payment $30 and they restricted my service. All phones on my plan were restricted. $30, I was so mad, lol.

 

[askfornina]

Why is MF talking like this information is coming directly from DB?

because apparently MF likes to pull things out of his behind. your guess is as good as mine. i don't know if i missed anything in that interview but i turned my tv off before it was over because MF was spewing complete trash and i couldn't take it.

 

[katydid23]

4 year old in the missing WA 2 year old (Sky?) case was interviewed and LE spokesperson at just finished news conference said that the 4 year old confirmed to them that the brother WAS IN THE CAR that day. He seemed to indicate that LE believed the child.


jmo

But it is easy to get a 4 yr old to lie for their mother. Mom can say " we have to tell the police man that Sky was in the car or else we will go to jail."

Or she can say " Yes, don't you remember? He was right there in his car seat? Right? " It is easy to change a 4 yr olds perceptions or beliefs if you are the person in charge of them. imo

 

[katydid23]

I use Verizon. I shorted my payment $30 and they restricted my service. All phones on my plan were restricted. $30, I was so mad, lol.

I wonder which provider the Irwins have then. On Sprint they only restrict the main phone line. Mine is restricted if I am late with my payment, but our other 3 phones work fine.

ETA: Just saw that it is Verizon. So both of their phones would be restricted then. Glad I use sprint.

 

[curvecuti]

That is true that when you are 'restricted' the outgoing calls go right to the payment center. [ except for 911 calls]

HOWEVER, they had two phones and only one would have been restricted. The other one can work normally when your account is on restriction. Only the primary phone, the account holders phone is affected.

That is not true with ATT, they are all restricted. Don't ask how I know. :innocent:

 

[cityslick]

because apparently MF likes to pull things out of his behind. your guess is as good as mine. i don't know if i missed anything in that interview but i turned my tv off before it was over because MF was spewing complete trash and i couldn't take it.

It's sensationalism, that's all it is. To be honest, I don't know why we consider Fox MSM because obviously half the stuff they report is BS.

 

[askfornina]

It's sensationalism, that's all it is. To be honest, I don't know why we consider Fox MSM because obviously half the stuff they report is BS.

the sad part is, some people will believe MF has inside info. :maddening:

 

[Peliman]

It's sensationalism, that's all it is. To be honest, I don't know why we consider Fox MSM because obviously half the stuff they report is BS.

You got a link for this info on half?

 

[yllek]

Well, we have teasers posted in this thread that both Spellman and Brookes will have new info later today related to Dane, the man who Megan claims had her phone for 2 days. Maybe we'll get some clarity in relation to call(s) received, though I suspect he will simply deny being in possession of the phone.

 

[katydid23]

Well, we have teasers posted in this thread that both Spellman and Brookes will have new info later today related to Dane, the man who Megan claims had her phone for 2 days. Maybe we'll get some clarity in relation to call(s) received, though I suspect he will simply deny being in possession of the phone.

But if he did a lot of texting, as MH has claimed, than maybe there is some record of his phone usage. Maybe.

 

[Evan's Mom]

That is not true with ATT, they are all restricted. Don't ask how I know. :innocent:

I've had it both ways with ATT.
I've been late where they restricted just my phone and I've had it where they restricted two phones and I've had it restricted on all 4 phones. It probably depends on how well the tech does his job.

*Disclaimer* My late payments were when I was without a job at the time. I haven't been restricted in about 5 years.

 

[curvecuti]

I've had it both ways with ATT.
I've been late where they restricted just my phone and I've had it where they restricted two phones and I've had it restricted on all 4 phones. It probably depends on how well the tech does his job.

*Disclaimer* My late payments were when I was without a job at the time. I haven't been restricted in about 5 years.

My "experience" was last year. :doh:

 

[Dewey2Me1MoThyme]

Can someone please ring me if Faux Let's Pretend it's News decides on a timeline they can agree on? It seems that until they can twist and turn "facts" to fit their agenda, we'll never have a clue.

 

[neese]

Yes, I DO have a porch in NY. But my house is in East Tennessee.

:floorlaugh: I'm sorry. It's another poster who is from New York. DUH!!!

 

[Dewey2Me1MoThyme]

I've had it both ways with ATT.
I've been late where they restricted just my phone and I've had it where they restricted two phones and I've had it restricted on all 4 phones. It probably depends on how well the tech does his job.

*Disclaimer* My late payments were when I was without a job at the time. I haven't been restricted in about 5 years.

Using your post as a jumping off point, I think some may be "assuming" Ji / DB and the loaner phone all used the same provider. IIRC Debbie said "One phone wasn't even working", so that rules out one phone and we are left with two. The other phone was on restricted service, provider possibly Sprint, then there is the loaner phone which could have had Verizon provider. MOO, JMHO, :twocents: and all that jazz.

 

[justamommy]

Me too and isn't 6:30 around the time SB supposely made her liquor run? JMHO

I have thought about this too. Questioning could have gone something like this... You remeber when your mommy went to store? Did you see Lisa while your mommy was gone? Maybe DB even let the little girl "help" put Lisa to bed. My daughter loved to help with my son at that age. I don't even know if this little girl was questioned. Just thinking out loud here. Who knows who saw what anymore? I know I'm totally baffled by this case. :seeya:

 

[In da Middle]

11-11:30 pm.

where is the waffle house that she says she was at at 2 am?

Did she describe which one? There are several close to here but in all different directions from here.

 

[justamommy]

Actually, IMO a four year old can get confused about who they saw on what day, when and with confidence.

True, but if they asked her the very next day she could have remembered seeing Lisa. I still don't know if the little girl was questioned.:twocents:

 

[neese]

This whole case is just utterly ridiculous. In the mean time, I've been reading and reading for something we can really take as truth to help find Lisa, yet I have a four-year old begging me to come out and play with him. So as any good parent/babysitter would do, I am going to do just that. I'm going outside to play and keep a close eye on this one, rather than get drunked up and neglect him.

If something happens to him, you can bet, I will know exactly what time it happened!!!

Furious!!! Have a great day.