Nancy Cooper, 34, of Cary, N.C. #20

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #481
Perhaps he kept it in his office at Cisco and perhaps LE looked specifically for it there under the warrant issued on the 25th to Cisco.

I still wonder if they searched the office for communication with other people that he MAY have planned it with (one of the far-out scenarios :crazy:). Given his expertise, I would assume that he could cover his tracks, but he may have thought this was a safe place to store information.
 
  • #482
I agree about calling it and seeing it light up or hearing it ring. I was just trying to keep the facts straight on the 911 call. We have so few hard facts on the case, It would be the pits to get sidetracked on something that wasn't there.


I do have a few facts...

BC was searching on Monday the 14th with long sleeves, a cap, and shorts. He did have a short conversation with someone from my home (I will not say me or who) and did ask a direct question. This was done at an outside location where BC was searching.

I saw a missing or broken bolt for his license tag, or just didn't bolt 1 end on. It was hanging about 2" lower on 1 side.

He does wear short sleeves, I have seen him recently. He has had company at his home, a male.

Both vehicles have been at his home visible at least 1 time since the SW

He has now shut all blinds and covered the window panes surrounding his front door.
 
  • #483
I do have a few facts...

BC was searching on Monday the 14th with long sleeves, a cap, and shorts. He did have a short conversation with someone in my home (I will not say me or who) and did ask a direct question.

I saw a missing or broken bolt for his license tag, or just didn't bolt 1 end on. It was hanging about 2" lower on 1 side.

He does wear short sleeves, I have seen him recently. He has had company at his home, a male.

Both vehicles have been at his home visible at least 1 time since the SW

He has now shut all blinds and covered the window panes surrounding his front door.

EEK, you just gave me the chills with the info. I don't suppose you can divulge the direct question, eh?
 
  • #484
Perhaps he kept it in his office at Cisco and perhaps LE looked specifically for it there under the warrant issued on the 25th to Cisco.

IDK...he did the copy of his passport on the 24th or at least it is stamped that.
I would have thought he was already put on leave by this time and not gained entry back into Cisco once NC was identified.

Wasn't the SW signed for on the morning of the 16th and not executed until the 25th?
 
  • #485
I still wonder if they searched the office for communication with other people that he MAY have planned it with (one of the far-out scenarios :crazy:). Given his expertise, I would assume that he could cover his tracks, but he may have thought this was a safe place to store information.

Something led LE there Anderson, no doubt about that. LE obtained that warrant for Cisco roughly 5 days after the search of the house was complete. There had to have been something found at the house or through the autopsy that led them to Cisco. We have seen no warrants for the cell phone astral data collection or for searches of computer hard drives taken from the home. It is possible these warrants could have been enclosed with the warrant for the house. 5 days could be enough to have processed at least some of this data maybe - it may have revealed transfer of data to Brad's Cisco office - its possible.

Between the search of the home there was also the release of all these affidavits - even though related to a civil matter - LE looked at them harder than we did. The issue of the VoIP - could relate directly back to Cisco. IMO, this was a major mess up by Brad and his lawyers - LE got a lot of information to work with from all of those affidavits. Error I think as there is littel doubt something took LE to CIsco's front door and it wasn't just because Brad worked there.
 
  • #486
EEK, you just gave me the chills with the info. I don't suppose you can divulge the direct question, eh?

No, I can't. But I will say it is what ended the conversation.
 
  • #487
IDK...he did the copy of his passport on the 24th or at least it is stamped that.
I would have thought he was already put on leave by this time and not gained entry back into Cisco once NC was identified.

Wasn't the SW signed for on the morning of the 16th and not executed until the 25th?

No the warrant for Cisco was signed the 21st - they would have had 48 hours to execute it. So the 23rd at the latest. It does seem unlikely it was confiscated before the affidavits - my error.

I made an error above - Cisco on the 21st the undisclosed warrant was on the 25th.
 
  • #488
No the warrant for Cisco was signed the 21st - they would have had 48 hours to execute it. So the 23rd at the latest. It does seem inlikely it was confiscated before the affidavits - my error.

I made an error above - Cisco on the 21st the undisclosed warrant was on the 25th.

There are so many times and dates it can get confusing. See I was wrong also when the SW were signed.

One thing is it appears BC has his passport.
 
  • #489
  • #490
Something led LE there Anderson, no doubt about that. LE obtained that warrant for Cisco roughly 5 days after the search of the house was complete. There had to have been something found at the house or through the autopsy that led them to Cisco. We have seen no warrants for the cell phone astral data collection or for searches of computer hard drives taken from the home. It is possible these warrants could have been enclosed with the warrant for the house. 5 days could be enough to have processed at least some of this data maybe - it may have revealed transfer of data to Brad's Cisco office - its possible.

Between the search of the home there was also the release of all these affidavits - even though related to a civil matter - LE looked at them harder than we did. The issue of the VoIP - could relate directly back to Cisco. IMO, this was a major mess up by Brad and his lawyers - LE got a lot of information to work with from all of those affidavits. Error I think as there is littel doubt something took LE to CIsco's front door and it wasn't just because Brad worked there.

Both your comments on VOIP and mistakes made by BC and his lawyers make so much sense. I still wonder what they found!
 
  • #491
There are so many times and dates it can get confusing. See I was wrong also when the SW were signed.

One thing is it appears BC has his passport.

One other thing to note about this RKAB posted a few days ago - when a Canadian is applying for US citizenship, the Canadians do impose a one year moratorium basically in which the person is not allowed to return to Canada. LE may not have had to take his passport depending on what stage he is currently in. Maybe he is already - "blacklisted" from entry to Canada - so it wouldn't matter - if he runs it will have to be to somewhere other than Canada.
 
  • #492
One other thing to note about this RKAB posted a few days ago - when a Canadian is applying for US citizenship, the Canadians do impose a one year moratorium basically in which the person is not allowed to return to Canada. LE may not have had to take his passport depending on what stage he is currently in. Maybe he is already - "blacklisted" from entry to Canada - so it wouldn't matter - if he runs it will have to be to somewhere other than Canada.

If he is having to stay here and can't go to Canada I hope he feels TRAPPED like NC did.

He is soon going to find out what trapped really feels like:behindbar
 
  • #493
No, I can't. But I will say it is what ended the conversation.

Wow. :hand:

It must be strange to have this happen in your own neighborhood. Take care!

PS

Thanks for sharing all of your local knowledge, it adds so much.
 
  • #494
  • #495
I think he used the sedan to 'run his early errands'. Apparently it was in the garage (X-5 was in the driveway per JA). He loaded the body into the trunk from the privacy of the garage and drove this to dump the body and to then to make the HT trips .....had to be the same car in case it was seen driving out of the neighborhood after 6 am.

I agree with you on this. I really do believe he used the sedan trunk for her body. I just don't have an ounce of me that believes he used the SUV for it.
 
  • #496
Wow. :hand:

It must be strange to have this happen in your own neighborhood. Take care!

No doubt. I didn't realize you were that close to this MT3K. Did you know Nancy?

I agree it's best to stay :silenced: with the public.
 
  • #497
Are both cars still in Brad's possession? If they are, I assume they were both processed and there was no evidence discovered. The same with the house. Either he was very careful or the house was not the scene, right? I guess they can't seal the house or seize the cars without evidence or strong probably cause but if LE thinks the crime may have occurred there they must be anxious with him still there.
 
  • #498
Wow. :hand:

It must be strange to have this happen in your own neighborhood. Take care!

PS

Thanks for sharing all of your local knowledge, it adds so much.

I live right outside of NC neighborhood. I actually live right in the center of all the places mentioned...NC home, JA home, LTF, HT, Bella's day care, Java Jive, running areas, St Francis church, Regency, car wash, etc.

I have to admit any place mentioned I can basically walk to. Between my husband and myself combined we have been in the area for 52 years. Every place mentioned I know someone who works there or goes there including my self and my family.

I have a friend who lives down the street from BC. Just last Saturday I had a house full of kids and found out later 1 of them lived near BC. It is something I can't get away from because I am surrounded by it.
 
  • #499
Wow, Mom. You finally let one slip, didn't you? So you say that someone at your home talked to Brad by phone on the 14th. Hmmmm...We WILL be sleuthing on that comment. And since i live so nearby. Hmmm...you have a girl that is going back to college. Did one of your children babysit for the Coopers? nah. That's not exciting enough.

Listen, go have a few glasses of wine and come back. :drink: We need to talk. :talker:
 
  • #500
Also, Mom--I live only a few blocks from BC. I'm wondering which neighbor of mine you are! :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
78
Guests online
1,324
Total visitors
1,402

Forum statistics

Threads
632,476
Messages
18,627,344
Members
243,166
Latest member
DFWKaye
Back
Top