• #35,501
Interesting.
How many people would actually buy this particular mask and for what purpose other than some sort of criminal activity? Also, it looks incredibly warm. How uncomfortable is this thing while wearing it?
I would pull it off after mere minutes 😅
We have something similar to this mask. We live in Minnesota, shoveling in the cold for over an hour, it helps to have your face totally covered.
 
  • #35,502
  • #35,503
There are plenty of people that work outdoor jobs that would wear this mask in extremely cold weather. However, this brings us to a very interesting point. NO ONE in Tucson would be buying this mask online intending to use it in cold weather because it doesn't ever freeze there, according to Google.
Yeah that was my point, it must be very itchy and sweaty to wear that
 
  • #35,504
This sounds like a PR/legal department response to alleviate public concerns and/or criticisms over the ease and speed with which Google spits out what many folks perceive (naively) to be private information. Even if it is public information, it doesn't necessarily mean Google has an implicit or explicit right to publish and make it available to anyone who searches for it on their platform. I imagine that might need to be determined, particularly if making the information readily available could've contributed to a crime. Governments are protected if they make information like that available to anyone - businesses may or may not be.

The Google searches of NG and SG, if from the same source and especially considering their dates and proximities to the crime, aren't likely coincidences.

JMO.
I think there’s a bit of misunderstanding about what’s being described.

There is no private information being disclosed here. Google isn’t publishing “who searched what.” What’s being referenced are aggregate trend metrics — essentially, how often a particular search term was used relative to other searches over a period of time.

In tools like Google Trends, Google does not publish:
  • Individual user identities
  • IP addresses
  • Exact search counts
  • Raw search logs
They publish normalized, relative interest data (scaled 0–100) based on aggregated search volume. It’s statistical trend information, not personal search history.

So legally and technically, this is very different from Google “making private information public.” It’s closer to publishing market research data than exposing individual activity.

As for the searches of NG and SG — if they originated from the same source and occurred close in time to a crime, that may be probative depending on context. But the existence of trend data itself doesn’t implicate privacy violations. The evidentiary value would come from properly obtained search history tied to a specific account or device — not from public trend graphs.

Just my perspective.
 
  • #35,505
There’s a documentary on Netflix called Lover Stalker Killer where a woman named Shanna "Liz" Golyar hid her IP address and masked her identity while stalking and impersonating Cari F. by using a combination of Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), proxy services, and specialized communications apps.
“The suspect used VPNs, proxies, and apps to schedule texts and hide their IP address. The successful prosecution, owing to years of work by dedicated public servants in two states, relied heavily on digital evidence to prove a premeditated, no-body homicide.”

A digital forensic investigator named Anthony Kava wound up writing a program that helped to solve the murder. Fascinating and unsettling documentary. The investigator even did an AMA on Reddit.


When it comes to the ransom communications I think some apps like this may be being used, obviously along with VPNs by the person(s) that have NG. And I know they’re gonna find these people and get Nancy back one way or the other.


This one was local to me (Nebraska case). Leslie Rule (Ann's daughter) wrote a great book about it called A Tangled Web that explains how they unraveled the case. I hope the same thing is not going on with NG's case because it actually took a few years before they figured out what was going on with the Golyar case. She was convicted in 2017. Shanna Golyar sentenced to life for first-degree murder (edited to add that she was convicted in 2017)
 
  • #35,506
To me the ‘bitcoin demand person’ wirh information sounds legitimate . However I fear there may be imposters copying him.
 
  • #35,507
  • #35,508
Yeah that was my point, it must be very itchy and sweaty to wear that
For "Porch Creep", yes. Those of us shoveling snow, etc in sub-zero temps, no. jmo
 
  • #35,509
A couple of days ago Brian Entin said to watch the next 24-48 hours.😑
I was also thinking the FBI and LE were close to an arrest or arrests. JMO
 
  • #35,510
  • #35,511

Report by Jim Moret on some of the implications of someone taking NG to Mexico and a group of ‘searching mothers’ who are looking for her in Sonora

 
Last edited:
  • #35,512
  • #35,513
I was also thinking the FBI and LE were close to an arrest or arrests. JMO
Anyone else feel like when they do actually make an arrest, it will be a surprise?
ETA: That could be interpreted a couple ways-- that was intentional ;)
 
  • #35,514
Had anyone bragged about passing the test ?
 
  • #35,515
Possibly also for a Halloween costume?
I don't know. The average highs in Tucson in October are 87 degrees. Way too hot that time of year to wear that mask as a costume. I really like this new lead, though. Since the mask can only be ordered online, maybe they'll be able to narrow it down to purchasers in the Tucson area. (I know, I know, one can dream that it could be that easy to catch this perp.)
 
  • #35,516
  • #35,517
  • #35,518
  • #35,519
Sorry if posted already. Just jumping in having not caught up from last night yet.

This ties to my post about the CNN Live guest, FORMER FBI SPECIALIST, who thinks its possible the perp has killed himself. And I further opined here if the perp may have committed M-S on 2/1 as part of a deranged plot to punish SG.

"AUTHORITIES searching for Nancy Guthrie’s kidnapper are looking at anyone who has gone MIA for the past three weeks, according to a report.

Source: U.S. Sun today (link does work)
 
  • #35,520
This one was local to me (Nebraska case). Leslie Rule (Ann's daughter) wrote a great book about it called A Tangled Web that explains how they unraveled the case. I hope the same thing is not going on with NG's case because it actually took a few years before they figured out what was going on with the Golyar case. She was convicted in 2017. Shanna Golyar sentenced to life for first-degree murder (edited to add that she was convicted in 2017)
Gosh, me too. Im guessing digital forensics investigators learned a lot with that case. They’re gonna find the person/ people that did this to Nancy!

(Goylar was Bat —$hit. I was so freaked out by that documentary. I didn’t see it coming until close to the end)
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
251
Guests online
3,834
Total visitors
4,085

Forum statistics

Threads
643,283
Messages
18,796,535
Members
245,102
Latest member
AgentOrange13
Top