• #19,021
  • #19,022
A few more hours of sunshine left for today.


Sunset time: 6:06:46 pm
 
  • #19,023
fbi aint looking great here!

how long???
 
  • #19,024
I wonder if by chance any of the neighbors had game cams on their property. It's a very safe neighborhood but to possibly pick up the wildlife that visits their property. Or I wonder if they will start. given what happened. JMO
 
  • #19,025
I really hope they didn't use this...but you never know right now :(
I was wondering that as well, or if they have a facial profiler/sketch artist who was able to look at it and make reasonable assumptions of what the individual looks like.
 
  • #19,026
watching the FBI GOING door to door near AG home and a giant Javelina goes walking by. This place is surreal.
I had to google Javelina!
 
  • #19,027
Based on LE's timeline and the broken lantana on the front porch with pieces on top of Nancy's blood I think this was a pretty abrupt kidnap as far as getting in and out especially when considering Nancy had some trouble with mobility.

The front door nest video disconnects at 1:47 a.m.

Software detects a figure (a person or animal) on video at 2:12 a.m.

Nancy's pacemaker app shows a disconnect from her phone at 2:28 a.m.

It lends that Nancy was taken in approximately 30 minutes from when the perp was first seen walking up to her porch.

It appears this 🤬🤬🤬 woke this frail little lady up in the middle of the night and snatched her from the sanctuary of her own home taking her away from her hearing aids and vital medication.
His punishment should be swift and severe.
 
  • #19,028
Is it just me or does it seem like big news in this case always seems to break around thistle of day?
 
  • #19,029
  • #19,030
This would be a twist for me. I thought for sure the ransom notes were just sick opportunists.
I'm waiting for someone more reliable than TMZ to corroborate this.

TMZ has a vested interest in this, and they desperately want the note to be connected to the person who actually took her.
 
  • #19,031
Please advise! I have to go make dinner and want to watch live coverage while cooking. What's the best live stream to watch? Thanks in advance!
 
  • #19,032
Someone said upthread that removing the camera would trigger it to record to the cloud (I hope I'm explaining that correctly.)
Removing the camera stopped it from overwriting future footage so Google/Nest was able to obtain it.
 
  • #19,033
I tried to get an idea of the doorbell camera's range by cross-referencing landmarks from the doorbell footage and an aerial shot of the property.

On the left is a screen grab from the video released by Kash Patel and on the right is an aerial photo from Newsweek. If the perpetrator drove/walked onto the property from the right (up the driveway leading to the garage) they would be out of range of the doorbell camera.

Screenshot 2026-02-10 at 3.22.23 PM.webp
Screenshot 2026-02-10 at 3.18.02 PM.webp
 
  • #19,034
  • #19,035
I wonder if by chance any of the neighbors had game cams on their property. It's a very safe neighborhood but to possibly pick up the wildlife that visits their property. Or I wonder if they will start. given what happened. JMO
I mean so many people have cameras esp in nice areas - for various reasons, but I though they said that the houses weren't close enough to really get images of activity at NG house
 
  • #19,036
I Can’t wrap my head around why they keep searching in Annie Guthrie’s neighborhood.

I just can’t figure out what the connection is.

I doubt at this point SIL is involved, so what leads are they following.
 
  • #19,037
  • #19,038
  • #19,039
Just popping in to say first thing I noticed about the perp was that his mouth is exposed. If he stayed that way (not even a surgical mask added) there may be DNA. Coughing or just heavy anxious breathing could have sprayed droplets inside. I hope that home was more thoroughly processed in the beginning than I thought. I'm looking forward to catching up with all the posts tonight - what a development to wake up to!
 
  • #19,040
Someone said upthread that removing the camera would trigger it to record to the cloud (I hope I'm explaining that correctly.)
or at least stop it from later overwriting the footage on the cloud. by stopping the camera from recording any more, the perp guaranteed the last footage in the cloud was of himself. otherwise, a few hours of cars passing and the breeze making the bushes wave around would have eventually overwritten it.

or at least, that was my understanding of what was said.
 
Chapter 1/4

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
210
Guests online
1,861
Total visitors
2,071

Forum statistics

Threads
644,160
Messages
18,812,210
Members
245,317
Latest member
reader24
Top