- Joined
- Jan 11, 2020
- Messages
- 5,478
- Reaction score
- 44,266
Take a look at Annie’s breathing in the video.
What is it like?
Take a look at Annie’s breathing in the video.
So this could have been at the back door?"At 02:12, software data detected movement on camera near the home, but there is no video available and the sheriff acknowledged an animal could have caused the motion."
It's the first time I've seen this being an outside camera.
From: US police believe Savannah Guthrie's missing mother is 'still out there'
Exactly there - nightstandMy guess would be that Apple Watch was on her night stand next to the bed. Crazy question but where does every one keep their watch?
Exactly! I saw Megyn Kelly speculate that, because the family was getting so much grief online for waiting an hour to call 911, they changed their story. With no working cameras, LE cannot easily determine when the family arrived.Another thing that seems a little weird to me is that there have been 5 days during which the information circulating was that the family had waited an hour to call the police.
Where did that piece of information come from?
Near the home doesn’t sound likeSo this could have been at the back door?
They recently have been more about photos of women in skimpy bikinis ,than the news source they used to be. Surprised if that was a Fox thing bc they are the more conservative outlet.Since 2021. I was surprised by that too.
There's a grass area, sth like a patio(?) at the back of the house, and a small pool. I'd say it was somewhere there. Is it ok to post a google maps link to the house, of post a screenshot of it?Near the home doesn’t sound like
Back door to me. I immediately thought more like a trail cam
Exactly! I saw Megyn Kelly speculate that, because the family was getting so much grief online for waiting an hour to call 911, they changed their story. With no working cameras, LE cannot easily determine when the family arrived.
She looks like she is hyperventilating.What is it like?
This would be incredibly foolish- the time can be verified by their cell phones. The call from the church member, the call to 911, the location of the phones, perhaps even that they opened the garage door.Exactly! I saw Megyn Kelly speculate that, because the family was getting so much grief online for waiting an hour to call 911, they changed their story. With no working cameras, LE cannot easily determine when the family arrived.
Could I pls ask for a source?band .....which had members with checkered, criminal pasts.
I do not understand how they communicated thus far and remained anonymousIf we assume that the ransom note is real and was sent by a person or persons who kidnapped NG, I can easily imagine a line of thinking that results in this lack of communication.
Their priority obviously is not getting caught. They asked to be paid in Bitcoin (which, as has been discussed is not actually untraceable, but many people think it is, and in any case it's less easily traceable than some other payment methods. And it's mainstream enough that the kidnapper could reasonably assume that the family could understand what's being demanded and make payment that way). They apparently sent the letter in a way that's not quickly traced. And they seem to have gone out of their way to write the letter such that they expected to get paid without any further back-and-forth. They made it clear that this was their plan all along.
Every message they send exponentially increases the chances that they will be caught. They will slip up in something they write, or mess up however they are anonymizing their sending, or whatever. Each new communication is a risk, and they surely know this. Opening up two-way communication is an even bigger risk. Setting up some private way for the family or LE to contact them is almost sure to get them caught, so they're not going to do that. And sending any pictures or videos also opens up huge risk of some inadvertent detail causing them to get caught.
If avoiding capture is even more important than getting paid, I can easily see them refusing to communicate further. And I can also see them assuming that getting NG back is more important to the family than money is, which would suggest that once they get desperate, they will pay even without proof of life.
I just don't think it's that hard to imagine a scenario where a kidnapper convinces themselves that they can and will get paid without sending any proof of life, especially if they are going to great lengths to stay untraceable.
if they are Americans.I think, if Nancy is still alive, making a video( recorded), sending it for proof of life could be traced to the sender, so unlikely. Even more so, I highly doubt they would do a Live chat with Nancy, so questions could be asked, to be sure it’s her, she is alive. Too much of a risk, I would think.
I pray for Nancy, but don’t see how she can be returned, slim hope. Sadly, I don’t see a viable way forward for Nancy, which is so sad. With FBI, so much heat, I suspect the perps still want the money, but they have No respect for human life, will not return Nancy. Just thugs that want money, and they likely won’t even get it!
As far as leaving the country, the abductors can collect $( if they are paid by the Family), from anywhere, its deposited online. They may have crossed the border right after crime, I doubt they would go now,( car might have been be identified). If they are already in MX, they may head as far South as possible, huge country.
Mexican police are very good at finding criminal Americans near the border, sending them back to USA for justice.
Just a few thoughts.
MOO