He also said a camera was sent off by his department for analysis.I believe the sheriff said the ring doorbell was taken. He doesn’t have it.
He also said a camera was sent off by his department for analysis.I believe the sheriff said the ring doorbell was taken. He doesn’t have it.
it could. It absolutely could.All of that is already known by Pima, for sure. IMO, this casts the light squarely on AG and the SIL.
There has to be a reason she was abducted. If it was not ransom, what do you think it was?I can’t buy into the ransom thing.
I believe the person that took her may be the person that wrote the note but only did so as a red herring. I believe the cops think the same thing.
I heard an investigator say that sometimes the older (in this case elderly) the victim of SA, the younger the offender. IMO
With the,case blowing up in the media makes it much worse for her IMO-- i dontThe perps spent scant time at this house even if you allow them the entire period from the camera going offline to the pacemaker disconnecting. Perhaps as little as 10-15 minutes. The purpose of the break-in seems to have been to grab her.
I started by leaning toward a plan where they take her to a bank or ATM, perhaps the next day. However, when the case blew up in the media, they changed their plans.
Now that we know she left all of her ID and belongings at home, that cannot be the case; how would she use her bank card if it's at home.
That leaves some other reason.
Money, Love/Sex, Revenge?
I can't imagine a way that she is still alive.
Was she abducted or murdered then carried out? No idea what to believe.There has to be a reason she was abducted. If it was not ransom, what do you think it was?
I know you're not addressing me, but all I can think of it has to do with money, in some way. Via stranger or family that's all I can think of.There has to be a reason she was abducted. If it was not ransom, what do you think it was?
Given that we don't know what triggered the alert -- and that there are other ways it could've happened -- it's not clear to me how that would necessarily implicate them.All of that is already known by Pima, for sure. IMO, this casts the light squarely on AG and the SIL.
I don't know how that's possible, as SG is a celebrity. what else would be expected?With the,case blowing up in the media makes it much worse for her IMO-- i dont
Think they expected, such intense media coverage
The rules vary from state to state. The original poster was making it sound like any random person out there could draft a POA without anyone's knowledge and that it would be valid.This is only true if you hire an attorney first who walks you through it. People CAN just obtain a form and have their loved one sign in front of a witness and then it's filed with the county court.
This has probably already been asked, but do we know that none of her daily medications are missing? Edit to add: I'm thinking like pills taken from a bottle and the bottle being left there or possibly extra bottles being taken? I know one of my medications is dispensed for 3 months at a time so I have multiple bottles of it at any given time.
Blink cameras can store video clips for 60 days even without a subscription -- you just need a thumb drive for "local storage". I can explain more off-thread for anyone interested.I also think it could be a belief that she lived in a safe area where a serious crime was believed to be low risk. Therefore there may have been the belief that there was no need to pay for a subscription that would likely only record mundane daily things.
I pay for a Ring camera subscription for my mom’s house but I didn’t do it in the beginning for the same reason I stated above. I originally thought just having the alerts sent to my phone would be good enough but I changed my mind after I woke up one morning and saw that I had missed an alert for activity at her door during the night. It is likely that it was an animal on her front porch, but I’ll never know and that’s why I decided it was worth paying for the subscription just in case I missed an alert or in case something happened and I would need to go back and review the video.
I was just joking the other day with my daughter that when my mom eventually dies and we have her funeral I am going to include multiple short clips of her arm/hand reaching out the door into the mailbox. She does it every day like clock-work and it makes me think of “The Thing” from the Adams’ Family. Some people do lovely poster boards and photo/video displays of loved ones but I guess we’re just a little bit twisted and would laugh at this.
View attachment 642101
AgreeI wonder who was responsible for making sure the Nest Camera Subscription was paid. Not likely Nancy. Probably just an oversight. Maybe not.
I assume the FBI helped set up the video and may have suggested who should be in the video. I think it would be better just to have the bio children present. And the video was aimed at the kidnapper, not making possible suspects look less guilty?Why wasn’t the son-in-law part of the family’s video message? That, to me, looks really strange. It sticks out. It would have helped in making him look less guilty.
Who benefits if she is deceased?There has to be a reason she was abducted. If it was not ransom, what do you think it was?
Guess I’ll throw in some speculation tooThanks for sharing this. So maybe she wasn't at an in-person church service after all. And we've been told that her regular church, which I'm pretty sure is St. Andrew's Presbyterian, does a livestream in which parishioners can't see who else is on (and maybe the church can't either).
So this definitely raises the question of who or what triggered the initial search. I do wonder -- could the church also have had some sort of online Zoom meeting after the livestream where her absence might've been noted? Something like a Bible study group? But that's just speculation on my part.
JMO
If the perp didn't know NG was the mother of a famous and wealthy person, I don't think it was a kidnapping for ransom.I don't know how that's possible, as SG is a celebrity. what else would be expected?
I have seen a number of cases where someone disreputable obtained a POA for an elderly person. ETA and it was not that difficult to do.You can't just go out and get POA on someone. It's not like taking out a life insurance policy and faking a signature. NG would need to have requested the POA and consulted a lawyer, then sign the document in front of the drafting attorney and a notary (sometimes the same person). I have guardianship, conservatorship, and durable POA over my mom who is now in memory care. Believe me when I say that there is a lot that goes into having a POA drafted for oneself, and also being assigned POA.