- Joined
- Jan 4, 2023
- Messages
- 167
- Reaction score
- 1,277
Agree. IMHO, I don't believe this was a kidnapping. If it was, the ransom letter seems to be, as Beans said, a "clumsy afterthought".If the kidnapping was real, targeted, carefully planned and all about money, surely among all that careful planning the perp would have known he would be asked to provide proof of life or some sort of evidence about her welfare, condition, location. Something to prove he actually had her. Something to make his chances of getting the money infinitely higher. The fact he clearly didn't consider that and doesn't seem to have anything he can use, is another reason I don't believe this was some random kidnapper and I don't think this was a kidnapping. No way would you go through all that, take that risk and then be all "oh yeah give me cash tomorrow, or next week, whenever you like really" and then just write it off as a bad day at the office if it doesn't work out for you.
It reeks of clumsy afterthought.
In addition, this neighborhood--and other wealthy neighborhoods in and around Tucson--have many residents who are single, elderly and much more wealthy than NG or her daughter SG. Many of the houses of these wealthy residents are as easy of a target as NG, but so the residents are known to have significant more wealth. So why NG?
Makes me think this was somebody who knew her. Don't think it was a planned kidnapping but that she was either seriously injured or had died, and they needed to get her body out of the house so their DNA wouldn't be found on NG.
So many details that have been reported don't fit with a kidnapping. And, if the report is true that the indoor security cameras were smashed, what kidnapper would know where all of the security cameras were in the house prior to being in the house.
Seems like the person responsible for what happened with NK had been in the house before and knew where the cameras where.
IMHO