I actually do think this could be cartel-related, although I'm not ready to conclude that quite yet.Well, that's not what I said. Tuscon is know for cartel activity by the FBI/DEA. There is plenty of spillover crime in Southern AZ. Now your statement about borders being the most highly policed areas, that's laughable for the Southern border as any LEO or agency working there can tell you about the influence of cartels in Southern AZ or El Paso, etc. It is well documented.
I'm not saying this was cartel directed and agreed with the prior post that it probably isn't but I did say:
I really like this theory. The first letter mentioned there would not be further contact. So if this is same author, really what would make them reach out? They hold all of the cards in this situation if they were the same person to abduct NG. I hope the AB video was a ploy to damage the perps ego. Maybe we can speculate that the family didn't pay anything yet. And combined with pointing towards SIL it provoked them to send another letter. Hopefully, that means the suspect may be devolving and slipping up.I am still trying to catch up, but possibly AB worked with LE and/or FBI to put pressure on the kidnapper to communicate by appealing to his ego and fear of not getting his ransom
What if AB's ID of SIL as prime suspect was a coordinated effort and AB was selected as the media person to do it because of her close and trusting relationship with SG
AB kept repeating the prime suspect details and that it came from a high level LE...over and over. Other news outlets were hesitant to report this because ME denied it, but it may have been enough to scare the kidnapper into reaching out
That could have helped to push the kidnapper to give more evidence of the validity of the ransom demand
There's no way they would do something like that. It is ethically wrong, and incredibly risky.I am still trying to catch up, but possibly AB worked with LE and/or FBI to put pressure on the kidnapper to communicate by appealing to his ego and fear of not getting his ransom
What if AB's ID of SIL as prime suspect was a coordinated effort and AB was selected as the media person to do it because of her close and trusting relationship with SG
AB kept repeating the prime suspect details and that it came from a high level LE...over and over. Other news outlets were hesitant to report this because ME denied it, but it may have been enough to scare the kidnapper into reaching out
That could have helped to push the kidnapper to give more evidence of the validity of the ransom demand
I don't see that as being a motive. If anything i'd imagine AG felt jaded by being the "less" wealthy/successful family member who has to take the responsibility of caring for her elderly mother. If Nancy was planning on moving into SG's care i'd think that's huge relief for AG.JMO - ransom notes are fake or ploys - never thought they were anything but some jerk trying to scam off a tragedy or ploys for distraction.
Motive: Rage brought on by NG announcing move, due to health problems, to SG’s home, POL video has many body language tells, lawyers being lined up, LE getting ducks in a row, finally LE took her vehicle in (might be the key), SIL accomplice after the fact
Maybe i'm only thinking about crime shows so forgive me... but hasn't there been real cases where LE purposely gives a story for the media to "leak".There's no way they would do something like that. It is ethically wrong, and incredibly risky.
She's absolutely getting destroyed by former law enforcement officials, as she's doing this to both promote herself, and cash in through her podcast.
She's undoubtedly damaging the case, and it's a true disaster for this investigation, especially if it does wind up being the son-in-law.
It's not some chess move, it's an absolute mess.
That said, I do think there's a reasonable chance that source is correct.
There's no way they would do something like that. It is ethically wrong, and incredibly risky.
She's absolutely getting destroyed by former law enforcement officials, as she's doing this to both promote herself, and cash in through her podcast.
She's undoubtedly damaging the case, and it's a true disaster for this investigation, especially if it does wind up being the son-in-law.
It's not some chess move, it's an absolute mess.
That said, I do think there's a reasonable chance that source is correct.
I don't think anyone can be certain what is going on, this is a very unique situation and I dont see anything unethical if SIL agreed to itThere's no way they would do something like that. It is ethically wrong, and incredibly risky.
She's absolutely getting destroyed by former law enforcement officials, as she's doing this to both promote herself, and cash in through her podcast.
She's undoubtedly damaging the case, and it's a true disaster for this investigation, especially if it does wind up being the son-in-law.
It's not some chess move, it's an absolute mess.
That said, I do think there's a reasonable chance that source is correct.
It's rare, but I have read about cases where they'll contact the media to announce a search in a particular area, or that they have found new evidence in a case or something. Those seem to be mostly local cases though.Maybe i'm only thinking about crime shows so forgive me... but hasn't there been real cases where LE purposely gives a story for the media to "leak".
POL?JMO - ransom notes are fake or ploys - never thought they were anything but some jerk trying to scam off a tragedy or ploys for distraction.
Motive: Rage brought on by NG announcing move, due to health problems, to SG’s home, POL video has many body language tells, lawyers being lined up, LE getting ducks in a row, finally LE took her vehicle in (might be the key), SIL accomplice after the fact
You are partly correct, however,I don't see that as being a motive. If anything i'd imagine AG felt jaded by being the "less" wealthy/successful family member who has to take the responsibility of caring for her elderly mother. If Nancy was planning on moving into SG's care i'd think that's huge relief for AG.
JMO
My understanding is she is on leaveI don’t have cable, did SG report the news as normal this morning?
Proof of Life videoPOL?
Link to she entered through garage pleaseIt has been reported that Nancy entered through the garage on her return home, not the front door where the blood droplets were.
I reckon the blood on the door step area were drips that fell as she was being moved.
I agree. And inspite of everyone thinking bitcoin wallets are anonymous, I don't think this is entirely true. In my personal opinion I think the US and some other government have broken the encryption and can link a wallet to a person. It's not something they will disclose for a simple case though. It's like the Harris Stingray system (llok it up), the government using technology to do things it cannot do legally and almost always drops cases rather than disclose evidence in court.But nobody has ever thought the SIL wanted ransom. They thought he murdered Nancy and wanted to make it look like someone else’s Bitcoin ransom scheme. So no motivation is possible for him to write a second letter. It appears to be legitimately a scheme for Bitcoin, whether or not the abductor would really return her or not.
A terrible thing; hope the person is caught soon and Nancy recovered.
But there is no directionality, to those drops they looked like they dropped straight down, as if she was standing there. Except how would you get that little aspirated spot ? Wouldnt you need to be close to the ground?It has been reported that Nancy entered through the garage on her return home, not the front door where the blood droplets were.
I reckon the blood on the door step area were drips that fell as she was being moved.