Could have been separated at some other location and phone/watch brought back to her houseThey also know she was alive when she got back to her home because her phone synced up to her pacemaker until the two things were separated around 2 am.
Could have been separated at some other location and phone/watch brought back to her houseThey also know she was alive when she got back to her home because her phone synced up to her pacemaker until the two things were separated around 2 am.
I did look into that yesterday, but the explanations were all over the place from weeks to years. Also exposure to weather etc.can it be determined how long the blood was there?
Same question I have.can it be determined how long the blood was there?
Good point. I am not quite clear on all of this and was wondering if it's possible the watch and phone were separated from her somewhere besides her house.They also know she was alive when she got back to her home because her phone synced up to her pacemaker until the two things were separated around 2 am.
i was thinking the same thing!This case falls in one of those categories like Jon Bennet or Kyron Horman where something just does not add up. Here me out: SG is in her 50s?? host of a daytime morning type show, right? Let's assume the kidnapper targeted NG due to the fame of SG. Asking for bitcoin seems like a "younger generation" play that would put kidnapper in 20s, 30s age range. Why not target Justin Beiber's grandma for example? The point im trying to make is if the kidnapper is targeting NG due to SG fame, it seems like a generational mismatch. I cant see SG being well known to a dude in his 30s. Now, based on that mismatch it points to someone local who knew of her fame. Local dishwasher at restaurant who knew NG had rich famous daughter. Or finally, someone from inside family concocting a super weird Fargo plot. This is my thought dump for the moment!!
Not saying this happened, but could she have heard something, went out the front door to look, walked down the step or stoop? Maybe that’s what she was referring to? But I don’t think that happened.Yeah, in my opinion, she’s blown it big time.
I have to think that, in general, 2 people would be more likely than 1 if a possibly unconscious or disabled Nancy was carried from her house and to a vehicle. If Nancy wasn't walking out herself, but was being carried out, that could explain the blood spatter. Whoever was carrying her out may have taken little care to prevent impacts to her body as she was being removed from the house.I agree they appear to be passive blood drops as she stood at the front door area bleeding. There is what appears to me to be a projected/impact spatter to the right of the mat - meaning a force coming in to contact with an already actively bleeding source. Although, it is possible that it could be aspirated blood from a couch or sneeze while actively bleeding. Hopefully LE tested that area to determine if there was air/mucus mixed in with the blood. Poor Nancy.
Levin's reason for think it is local based on choice of stations to me is a non starter. Of course it. is easy to see who is reporting on the kidnapping and they would go to those stations. I think Harvey indicated there was another reason to think it is locals.Maybe this was mentioned earlier. Also apologize for spitballing...
Assuming that this ransom note author is connected to NG abduction. And is the same author of the second letter received via tip by KOLD tonight. IMO, the author of these letters loves the media attention and seeming like they are smarter than LE. But why KOLD specifically? Why pick to send a letter to TMZ, KGUN and KOLD. Then send a second letter solely to KOLD as a tip? Then maybe Harvey Levin of TMZ is correct to believe that this perp is local to Arizona.
Otherwise tomorrow, please let it be soon. Several pages back, sheriff said something to the effect of what they found or were looking for at N’s house wasn’t going to be released out of respect to the family. That is pretty telling and sad. I hate to even think what happened to her and what her family and friends are going through.IIRC the Sheriff also said it was released back to them too and just standard. Although taking NG's car apparently was not during the first search lol
They would take their car to process it if it was the last vehicle she was in.
I find it almost incredible that no media caught them taking the car, but JMO.
I don't know! Savannah isn't really an all that controversial journalist. She was scheduled to go off to the Olympics which is mostly just morning show highlights.Good observations on my post. If we follow on down from my logic and your expanded "rule outs" then that leaves someone local who just knows NG as a "wealthy" lady compared to them, right? Someone who knows shes maybe sort of famously connected for some reason, but not somone who targeted her because of SG. Would that be your arguement? But I agree, I think there are way wealthier people that could have relatives targeted if it was simply about money. But, again, something just feels odd and off and I cant really put my finger on it! But again me trying to get in the head of a person who would do this is really an exercise in futility.
I’m still about 30 pages behind, but maybe the perp manually disconnected the garage door from the track and opened the door to get the car out. We’ve had to do that when we’ve lost power. Simply disconnect the door from the track and lift it. That would bypass using the garage door opener and leaving an electronic record of when it opens and closes.Yeah, that is a really big problem with her car being involved.
Holding it back doesn't seem to work, because you'd fully expect them to have towed the car if they knew the garage had been opened later on.
I guess disconnected could work...
It's an issue.
she's controversial in certain political circles, if you watched the aftermath after one of the presidential debates years back. And that stuff is STILL going aroundI don't know! Savannah isn't really an all that controversial journalist. She was scheduled to go off to the Olympics which is mostly just morning show highlights.
And if someone was trying to get to her to suppress some kind of upcoming story or send a message to media not to report some story, at this point way too many people are involved to keep it quiet. LE has seen it. TMZ has seen it. Local news media anchors have seen it. Whatever new intern monitors the local tip line inbox has seen it. Way too many eyes to send a private message to SG.
So I don't even have a theory at this point. Nothing makes sense.
early on it was said that phone was in the car.I don't have an opinion one way or the other about the phone's location, but it states that the phone was found at the home, not in it. I take it that they are telling the reader that NG did not take the phone with her. If the phone was in her car, it was at the home.
Criminal profiling continues to make advancements year after year in this field. They study crime scene behavior and offer advice to assist LE in narrowing down a suspect pool. You can't dismiss them outright as they are one of many investigative tools in any LE officers toolbox to utilize during investigations.So perhaps referencing Silence of the Lambs when talking to kidnappers is part of an old FBI protocol which at one time was effective based on data? Even though on the surface it is counterintuitive?
I would think the FBI would periodically update their protocols. Something effective in 1991 may not be effective in 2026.
Also this one size fits all and outdated strategy goes agains the entire notion of psych profiling which is to understand the unique personality of the perpetrator and develop a specific response strategy based on that personality. If the strategy is old and generic, then there is no need for profilers.
I hope so! I'm having a difficult time sleeping wondering where Nancy is...Today will be the day. Im speaking that into existence