I could see that as a potentiality. Does anyone know how any searches have been run in the area?I believe that NG's body is close to her home. The abductor doesn't have her body nearby. MOO
I could see that as a potentiality. Does anyone know how any searches have been run in the area?I believe that NG's body is close to her home. The abductor doesn't have her body nearby. MOO
Unless there is an alternative message in this video -The amount of rage I would feel, I don’t think I could make a video telling you I will pay you for the body of my mother, whom you murdered.
This is what I've been thinking happened. But then my question was where the blood out front came from - maybe it was already there?I agree. I think someone took her out to dessert and left back door open to make it look like she wandered off. We've seen aerial searches for her but nothing on foot. I would imagine she possibly could be under a bush or a tree to hope she isn't found very quickly so any DNA or evidence might be destroyed with the elements but quick enough to get inheritance. I thought suffocation with a bag would leave little evidence behind.
Sorry for misinterpreting.....I hope you are right and I'm wrong.I should have clarified. I dont necessarily think she is dead.
There don't seem to have been extensive searches in the area - which I thought was weird. They've gone out in the desert a few times but not for very long and it hasn't semeed like an in detail search.I could see that as a potentiality. Does anyone know how any searches have been run in the area?
Great idea!Someone could have paid it and not releasing that information to the public.
Yes, there have been several comments about it.Has it been mentioned about the Silence of the Lambs quotes in the family’s videos and if so, what does everyone think ?
This was the stumbling block for me, as well.I agree it appears she’s no longer with us but what gets me is why do they say “celebrate WITH her” to me that indicates someone who is still alive. Again, I think they’re responding in some way to something the captor wrote in a message. But the word ‘with’ to me is really not indicating she’s deceased as of this moment. We can try and spin it in any way, but usually you’re not celebrating WITH a dead person, you’re celebrating the dead person.
No problem at all, I really wasn't very clear in that.Sorry for misinterpreting.....I hope you are right and I'm wrong.
The kidnapper is a relative and knows the houseHe doesn't have confidence in this, which is why he cut the cable that supplies internet to the house (that's what I took it to mean by "disconnected," plus on the CourtTV livestream last night the reporter mentioned that an adjacent neighbor also had her cameras "disconnect" that night).
Yes! That told it all. The other sentences leave a teeny bit of room for interpretation.The words, "this is the only way we'll have peace" say it all at least to me.
She's gone and they want to give her a proper burial.
I have thought about this too. I have a dear friend whos father (a bit younger than NG) is regularly getting scammed into sending bitcoin to random people. At one point he was convinced he was communicating to/sending bitcoin to Shania Twain. I’m not saying that’s what I really think happened here, but I have thought about it because it does happen and it’s horrible!Nancy could've been a victim of a romance/sweetheart scam.
Think about it. She's an elderly, single woman who may want some romantic companionship. From what I've heard, she recently lost her dog so she's probably extra lonely all alone in that big house. Sure, she has a church community but she's been attending virtually for awhile and could be spending more time online. Her Facebook account looks like the typical random mishmash of stuff and doesn't necessarily scream tech-savvy. She also appears to have lost some weight and she may have been feeling a bit more confident.
Social media is full of scammers. I could easily see a bad actor luring into their web of lies while gassing her up. They're messaging back-and-forth all day, every day. She tells him about how her life story, her hopes and dreams, her values, and how her days are going. He's a successful silver fox who actually isn't because they're all stolen photos. Maybe he isn't really just one bad actor, but a group of them who have figured out who she's related to and that she has money.
Anyway, she's telling him about her children and how Annie is a jeweler. Perhaps Nancy has told the scammer man about the Tucson Gem & Mineral Show, which if I'm not mistaken, is the largest show in the world for rockhounds. People travel from all over for this event. Scammer man/men are interested and tell Nancy that this would be a great time to meet. What they're really thinking is, "Jackpot! Now's a great time to travel to Tucson, blend in with the crowd, and rob Nancy."
What makes me pause with my theory is that these scammers usually don't ever want to actually meet. Maybe they wanted to just be in the area and wait until she's out to rob her house. Who knows, maybe they're extra bold in this instance. Let's go back to their messaging back-and-forth. On fateful January 31st, Nancy says something like "Ok, I'm going to my daughter and son-in-law's house for dinner tonight and tell them about our relationship. I'm so excited for you to meet them!!!" I've heard that a lot of seniors (not all) are embarrassed to tell their kids that they're dating again, so this could very well be a big deal for her.
Annie and Tommaso have been drinking while cooking, and don't want to pick up mom under the influence, so they request an Uber ride for her instead. Nothing weird about that. Nancy arrives and tells them her amazing news once they've all sat down for dinner. Annie and Tommaso are all "WTF!? You're talking to a scammer! Cease all communication IMMEDIATELY." Nancy is upset and has been so brainwashed that she messages scammer man when she comes home saying, "I'm home now. My family doesn't believe in our love and I'm so upset. They want us to break up now." He replies with, "Nothing can come between us, my love. They'll come around. Don't give up!"
At this point, the scammer/scammers are beyond PO'd at Annie and Tommaso. They've already bought tickets, flown into Tucson, and now their plans are this close to being thwarted. They decide to take out the ultimate revenge by kidnapping Nancy in the middle of the night and sending ominous ransom notes.
I'll be the first to admit that I have an active imagination, but you can't tell me these scams aren't common. Check out this video, this article, and this article. My mom also used to be a flight attendant and told me about a passenger she had once on a trip coming back from London. The passenger was an elegant-looking, elderly woman who was visibly upset. When the crew members asked what was going on, she said that she was totally stood up at the airport the other day by a man she was supposed to meet and had sent a lot of money to. She really thought they were in love, and was so ashamed and embarrassed to tell her kids. At least she made it home alive.
Or the perpetrator is using the kidnap as a ruse to deflect from being identified?
This is how I interpreted the family video. I think the supposed abductor is telling the family that Nancy has died. He/they might not want to return the body because it could contain clues or DNA. The family is offering to pay. I immediately thought "celebrate" meant a "celebration of life", as funerals are referred to in some Christian denominations, such as my own, the Catholic church.Mary Coleman (local TV reporter) saw the second note and said that it did not contain anything to do with a ransom - which may mean that the communication was to tell the family that NG is no longer alive.