I began my sentence “ I’ve considered”.I said it.Where was it said AG borrowed NG's car?
Thank you and Welcome. This is great sleuthing.MOO.
I would imagine the abductor, trying to prevent leaving any DNA from stray hairs, etc., wore fresh clothes to NG’s house. (However bumbling they may be in some ways, they seem to have managed not to leave DNA that got found–and some article said the ransom note bragged about that, though I don’t know if that was validated.) I was initially thinking the jacket was likely to be from Walmart since the backpack seems to be. I agree with others that the overall jacket style is pretty basic–but the zipper is not. It’s got contrasting piping on each side of the zipper rather than the zipper itself being high-contrast. I could not find any like it at Walmart online, with both the horizontal dark line across and the contrast zipper style. But I did find a soft shell that’s sold in Europe that is very similar to that style. I believe Pitch Stone is a Scandinavian brand. I do not know if it’s sold in the US. (I’m an American who moved to Scandinavia.)
I agree with other posters this theory seems wild to me, without additional context/evidence. But I will say I agree with you that I think there could be more to this case than it seems. Either that or it's remarkably simple. I think it will be one way or the other.Iranian sleeper cell - that is the only thing that makes sense at this point.
It sounds crazy to me as well but this is obviously bigger than what any of us originally thought.
I think there are negotiations going on behind the scenes and Nancy is still alive.
The non payment of the bitcoin ransom and Savannah's solo plea makes sense now.
I agree that maybe they were gathering clothes, personal items, mail, even cleaning out the fridge, since AG's family hasn't been there. And they don't want to contaminate anything with their prints given it's the last place NG was known to be seen.My apologies if this video of bags being carried out has already been posted.
Is this confirmed information? Do you have a link? Very interesting if true....Potential evidence . . glove found along roadway similar to one in video
Agreed ... and have asked myself why would they take Nancy at all ?Kidnapping though? That seems personal.
At the risk of sounding cold, why would you bother moving an 84-year old lady when it's easier to NOT move her? It just adds risk and work.
It has happened, but generally it's in the "cold case" stage, from what I have seen anyway.Wondering if anyone can think of a case where hiring a private investigator helped more than it added to the confusion.
I really can't think of any off the top of my head.
Where was this reported? If accurate, this could be a huge breakthrough.Potential evidence . . glove found along roadway similar to one in video
Yes, exactly. I forget what show I was just listening to and what expert was on the, they are all blending together at this point. This isn't sourced material, just insights and opinions. But they were saying in a true kidnap for ransom, the abductor would leave a note at the scene and say, "No authorities or we'll hurt Nancy" and absolutely would not want police, FBI, or media. They want their damn money, they pick a wealthy family, they threaten, and they want to collect and peace out. Nor do they want to caretaker an elderly lady for days. Like where do you hide this person who needs to eat and drink and needs meds. It just doesn't make sense.To take a body is weird though. Most people would do what they came there to do and leave. If they’re there to murder, they do it where they are. Dragging an 841year-old woman around is hard work and you could easily get caught. You also don’t send a ransom days later and not to the family. Usually you would also warn the family to not contact authorities or they’ll kill the person. They went right out and alerted the media bringing it to the attention of law enforcement. It makes no sense. Yet another reason the ransom sounds bogus. It would make more sense if she died elsewhere and this was staged to look like someone broke in and took her, but it would still be weird, taking her. If the ransom bit is bogus then this person, the perp who took her, is the luckiest person on the planet. They have someone creating a red herring for them without even asking.
duplicate post? Family has seen these photos and would be able to identify their own family.has it been noted on this forum that the eyes and mouth of the SIL seem to resemble the guy in the mask? does he have a solid alibi? hate to speculate about a family member but...
Just has a movement sensor on side of lite...so I can just move my hand by it to turn on an off. If I walk close to a tree or something solid it also turns on n off...How do you turn it on and off without touching it? How does the sensor work?
Reading up on that Zizian cult…..quite frightening!Could it a bunch of weirdo teens/young group of people working together, not in unison, explaining the stupidity of the ransom (seems like an afterthought if genuine) and trying to get in/dealing with the door cam? If so, then one of them will probably crack. People are still leaning towards this being a one-on-one personal attack.
Someone brought up the Zizian cult. That’s an interesting theory.
Does the phone lose connection with the pacemaker if the phones battery goes dead?I believe LE will have to use geo information from her phone/watch prove she made it home that evening. The garage door going up and down really only proves the door went up and down.
The daughter and SIL say they brought her home and that may be 100% true. But LE is going to need some way to prove that. Assuming anyone is ever charged for whatever has been done, a defense attorney will suggest them as possible perpetrators. unless there is evidentiary proof she safely reached the house.
I'm still a little confused about the pacemaker and phone. The Sheriff said phone lost connection with the pacemaker, but I keep reading that they don't even connect until the pacemaker sends its nightly report. That makes sense to me for the purposes of battery preservation.
MOO
Hmmm, the only problem with that theory is it wasn't much of a dry run if he still had to figure out the flowers to cover the camera. Seems like he would have figured some stuff out about the front of the house on the dry run. But maybe he was testing to see if motion sensors lights, came on or if by walking up he hears a dog, etc. So, just initially testing out. Doesn't want to have bag of stuff on him if an alarm is triggered or lights pop on..Maybe the two photos are from entirely different nights..A dry run so to speak.
Thank you, this is what I have been trying to figure out. If he was a person they were interested in prior to the videos being released.