- Joined
- Dec 16, 2024
- Messages
- 314
- Reaction score
- 1,897
Re BK. It was pretty fast, re genetic geneology party of case. They had the clues to search Dad’s trash.I don’t know the exact ins and outs of the process used in the Idaho case but from what I gather the knife sheath DNA matched to a cousin in a genealogy database and then investigators used a family tree with that cousin to get to BK’s parents. They then obtained DNA from BK’s dad and found it was a parent-offspring match.
I understand that family tree records definitely can have problems/errors and there’s even issues with official historical records (such as how at a certain point in time if a Native American woman was married to a white man and living in “white society”, Census workers would mark her race as white. Even if she was actually half or full NA.)
If while referencing the tree the investigators had found say, Dick and Jane Doe in Florida instead of BK’s parents in Pennsylvania, as long as they legally obtained a sample of Dick’s DNA to test against the knife sheath DNA (and obviously found it wasn’t a close parent-offspring match so didn’t proceed further) I guess I’m not seeing an issue with it?
Moo
LE got Dad’s DNA from PA trash can, to confirm they had it right. BK lived there, too. BK was fastidious about separating his own trash, putting in neighbors can, etc. they did not find BKs DNA in trashcan.
BKs DNA on knife sheath, matched “son” of Dads DNA, Bingo! They later confirmed, “ directly” with a swab of BK’s own mouth, matched sheath!
JMO