• #26,601
I’m not convinced that it is the same person but, if it is, does anyone else think this guy may have a neck tattoo?
Absolutely. He should be easily identified by people who know him.
 
  • #26,602
Are these “influencers” from social media? I usually ignore them in these heavily covered cases. Do some of them look fishy in this case? They’re usually not suspicious, just pesky, occasionally informative.

Aren’t most of these people from out of town, so less likely POIs?
Re You tubers, influencers.

Many are very accurate, discussing true crime cases, most are monetized, because the channels are the hosts’ day jobs! That’s ok to have commercials, need to make a living, too.

Viewers exit the You tubers and influencers who are not accurate, or misleading. People want to get to the bottom of the truth! The ones that are questionable don’t make it.

Most of the channels that are successful, are very good with the truth, great guests. I watch several myself.

I’m glad I’m at WS, because the info that comes out is thorough and vetted, honest. Top notch!

JMO
 
  • #26,603
  • #26,604
He said "WE" did not find glove......wasn't it FBI who supposedly found gloves? What gives? JMO
Think he would mention if a glove was found in general
 
  • #26,605
What’s this phone question?
Megyn Kelly made a comment about LE asking neighbours repeatedly about AG and SIL, and have they seen a phone.

There's still some doubts around whether she meant neighbours of AG or neighbours of Nancy (and we know for sure they have been talking to Nancy's neighbours)

I just listened to Megyn's comments again, and I wonder now if she actually meant LE were asking Nancy's neighbours about what AG/SIL are like, because when she mentions the phone, she says something like if the person (i.e. kidnapper) dropped it. Which would suggest it was Nancy's neighbours.

 
  • #26,606
DBM
 
  • #26,607
Her DNA was recovered in her home but they can't say if it was blood. Why not? I hope and pray she wasn't s*xually assaulted.
could be urine in a place where it shouldn't be.
 
  • #26,608
We need to get this corrected. Is she talking about Nancy's neighbors or Annie's because that makes a HUGE difference?
If I heard correctly, she is talking about AG and TC's neighbors. Asking them what are AG and TC like. I base that on what she said at the very end, about "there's no need to keep going back there [to AG's home] to keep asking them, again and again...what are they like." The phone part was a little odd. She only mentioned it for a second, but said nothing more than, something like, 'and I guess there is a phone that was found -- ?' I am paraphrasing here.

All MOO.

ETA: clarity
 
Last edited:
  • #26,609
HER DNA would not indicate a sexual assault. JMO
 
  • #26,610
.
There would be many sources of NG's DNA in her home besides possible blood droplets or spatter. DNA can be found on hairbrush, toothbrush, coffee or teacup by her bedside or in dishwasher, dirty clothes in hamper, etc. Your DNA and my DNA are all over our respective homes because we live there.
I read it as maybe it meant DNA specific to the crime . It could be related to other bodily fluids or that Nancy was sick due to fear.
 
  • #26,611
Now the Sheriff is saying (on Fox news) the DIDN'T find a glove in the house?!? OMG......
 
  • #26,612
No glove in the house. I was under the impression that the glove that was sent to the lab in Florida was the glove from the house.
So was it one of the "several" gloves found by the roadsides?

As for those gloves, they could simply be gloves thrown out by workers......or it came to mind there's a creep, teenager, whomever who is throwing them around for his own sick pleasure to be in the news.
At this stage, I'm just picturing driving down the local roads and seeing black gloves strewn on cacti, street signs and rolling past on a tumbleweed
 
  • #26,613

Kash Patel, FBI director, is on location in Tucson, AZ for a "pre-planned" trip to speak with indigenous people.

I wonder how long he will remain in area? Is his presence going to help the investigation?
 
  • #26,614
What is your opinion on why he was knocking?
Maybe knocking for his accomplice(s) who entered from the back door to let him in?
From my own experience working with elderly people, it’s preferred by most that I worked with to have guest knock loudly. Even with doorbells present.
IMO he was going to knock to see if there was any movement inside before moving forward.
 
  • #26,615
It really is amazing how much information about you is available in a five minute search on the internet. I found my address, phone number, the exact layout of our home, who lives at the address, previous addresses, my professional credentials.

This is just by putting in my name on Google. Sort of scary really.
Yes, it is and when I realized that a few years ago and being partially deaf I changed a few things on my property. Actually that is the reason why my home is now set up with a security system, only one way onto my property and into my home. I know who is accessing the property / doorway before they arrive AND if not invited; I don’t answer. My German Shepherd reminds them that its his home. My good boy gets lots of treats 🐕‍🦺❤️
 
  • #26,616
TMZ said the time of this video is 2:12 a.m.
Obviously it wasn't physically removed from the bracket until after 2:12 a.m. when this video was captured.
2:12 a.m. is when a sensor captured something/someone. LE didn't mention a camera capturing anything or anyone except at 2:12 a.m. so that leads me to believe the disconnection was from wires cut or via a phone app.
“TMZ said…” but has LE confirmed this video was from 2:12? Unless there’s third-party confirmation then I have to go with the prior timeline of doorbell disconnected around 1:47am and another camera detecting a person at 2:12. We know there were multiple cameras including those in the back of the house that were solar powered.

Also after LE removed the mounting bracket, there was no obvious sign of electric wire there so the doorbell camera seems to have run on batteries.

I doubt the intruder logged into her phone to turn off the cameras but something like that would be indicated by the logs too.
 
  • #26,617
bbm

eh, any reporter can tell you the camera has a weird effect on regular people. they get a little silly and talk out of their rears. the common impulse to embellish or tell tall tales for attention gets worse. my gut says that's all that's going on here.
Yes it could be just that.
 
  • #26,618
I’ve seen the unedited version of this video directly from the neighbors app and that guy is a dead ringer for the sketch drawn by the person in Texas, imo. However, I genuinly don’t know if the person who drew the sketch saw this video and was unconsciously biased.

This is a great and very important question. From my understanding LE are just now looking into the man from the January 23rd ring cam as this was a recent find.
 
  • #26,619
What I fear is that, five years from now, we will read that the FBI is following "new and promising leads" and still knows next to nothing about this crime. It's beyond frustrating...

Kash Patel, FBI director, is on location in Tucson, AZ for a "pre-planned" trip to speak with indigenous people.

I wonder how long he will remain in area? Is his presence going to help the investigation?
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
360
Guests online
4,091
Total visitors
4,451

Forum statistics

Threads
641,883
Messages
18,779,958
Members
244,880
Latest member
kasskeleton
Back
Top