It's been a week since doorbell camera images became public. But officials still don't have a suspect in the case.
www.latimes.com
i'm sure you guys discussed this at length but it's the first time i'm seeing it...
"Sources told The Times that authorities have no proof the person who authored the ransom note has Guthrie. But they also said that note felt credible because it included details about a specific damaged piece of property and the placement of an accessory in the home that had not been made public."
interesting that LE/media go bananas over a glove, literally flip-flop on forced entry/cameras/et cetera but until tonight, i've never seen this. damaged piece of property? a broken glass/a flipped over chair? what is the meaning of 'the placement of an accessory in the home that has not been made public'? a toothbrush in the toilet? a shoe in the garage?
perhaps this has no meaning, but it stands out to this wascally wabbit...