• #38,021
Why can't it be late night of Jan 31, and a few hours later of Feb 1? Confused, here. jmo
Jan 31 would've had fairly good moon illumination too. Minimal cloud coverage. Imo the background is way too dark for it to be a few hours before the abduction.
JMO
 
  • #38,022
I am not able to keep up with these posts and the tips, etc. Who is LD? I cannot imagine I haven’t heard of anyone with those initials. I am seriously feeling that i have lost out on way too much.
Haha FOMO! “ Fear of missing out “ at WS! Yeah, it’s hard to keep up alright.

LD is the grey Range Rover guy. They raided his house, 2 miles from NG, he has a felony criminal history, drugs and other arrests. They took the grey RR for vehicle evidence collection.
 
  • #38,023
💯! What I want to know is THEN WHO did this photo come from? What the heck is going on here
The photo came from the FBI, recovered from Google’s servers. The sheriff is speaking about tonight’s new info, telling us (contrary to Kash Patel’s assertion) that the image came from a different day.
 
  • #38,024
Well, if it was after midnight on that day, could no backpack person have been there early early Sunday morning, let’s say 3 am? We don’t know when the “kidnaping” started-if it was before midnight, that could be same day. The video could then be considered the next day.
Late late Sat night, then early early Sun morning ??? With only a few hours in between?
 
  • #38,025
I'm feeling so lost on what to think/feel about this case right now. You all MUST be as frustrated as I am. And angry. I'm actually ANGRY that they didn't confirm this sooner.
The public does not have a right to know anything. LE has to do whatever it takes to do the job they are trained to. They don't want the possible kidnappers/murderers to have any heads up. While we are all concerned and want to know, we have to trust there will be a solution sooner rather than later.
 
  • #38,026
Do we know if NG did anything the evening of Jan 31 or was she home by herself?
 
  • #38,027
 
  • #38,028
If ransom isn't real, then political/ideological motivation would be my theory.
But wouldn't there be a statement released (hypothetical example, "stop killing in Gaza").

Political terrorism usually comes with a message.
 
  • #38,029
CNN Live:

John Miller

We're just learning it now for the first time. Authorities didn't want to go into that level of detail when they released those pictures (implying this isn't new to them).

What it means is, there was obviously some kind of casing, probably from afar and eventually had to take that casing up close (looking for cameras, etc).

Speculates that they may have damaged the floodlight on a previous trip.

FBI expert: Doubles what they're looking for. "Tremendous." A good chance this could lead to more substantive leads.
 
  • #38,030
  • #38,031
Well, if it was after midnight on that day, could no backpack person have been there early early Sunday morning, let’s say 3 am? We don’t know when the “kidnaping” started-if it was before midnight, that could be same day. The video could then be considered the next day.
or it could be before midnite of the day of the kidnapping. He could have been hiding out for a long time. Letting Nancy go to sleep, etc. He could have been hiding anywhere in the back, a lot of places to hide and maybe then is when he took out the two floodlites on the back. He was there before midnite which would have made it on 1/30 and these reports could be true
 
  • #38,032
💯! What I want to know is THEN WHO did this photo come from? What the heck is going on here
This photo was released by the FBI at the same time the footage was. Sheriff is just claiming his department or FBI didn't officially announce that "the image is from a different night"
 
  • #38,033
  • #38,034
IMO in the earlier pic the neckline on the jacket seems to sit lower than in the images we have of the perp smashing the cam.The fit of the jacket looks different, not as form fitting, hangs differently at the lower hemline and narrower in the hips and slimmer in the thighs. Also, black marks on shoes not visible in the other image but could be lighting.

MOO


1771896188884.webp
1771895605593.webp
 
  • #38,035
I think this kind of rules out someone who worked around or at her house-- wouldn't they be somewhat familiar with the home and not need to do surveillance 3 weeks in advance?
No. Every trip served a purpose. She was targeted. IMO He peeped her house prior to this and I would be willing to bet this person was IN her house recently ( either known or unknown) to NG prior to her disappearance. There’s too many similarities to something I’ve personally experienced. It’s horrifying. I hate it. Prayers for Nancy and family.
 
  • #38,036
Late late Sat night, then early early Sun morning ??? With only a few hours in between?
Or possibly the day before.
 
  • #38,037
  • #38,038
Do we know if NG did anything the evening of Jan 31 or was she home by herself?
That's the night she went to her daughter and SIL's home to play games.
 
  • #38,039
  • #38,040
DBM....already posted.
 
Last edited:

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
88
Guests online
2,094
Total visitors
2,182

Forum statistics

Threads
643,569
Messages
18,801,332
Members
245,191
Latest member
BBartloff85
Top