• #38,041
  • #38,042
Is this a persons head on LHS ? Light trick?
Upped saturation
IMG_8840.webp
 
  • #38,043
is the lighting on the porch because of the moon or is it because of the IR camera? Was this actually the lighting on the porch at that time of night? I'm getting more confused tonite lol
 
  • #38,044
IMO in the earlier pic the neckline on the jacket seems to sit lower than in the images we have of the perp smashing the cam.The fit of the jacket looks different, not as form fitting, hangs differently at the lower hemline and narrower in the hips. Also, black marks on shoes not visible in the other image but could be lighting.

MOO


View attachment 647895View attachment 647884

Could be why LE identified the backbag but specified they couldn’t ID other articles of clothing.

MOO
 
  • #38,045
  • #38,046
Is it possible he didn't see the camera? We can see from the background it's nearly pitch black, no moon illumination and no street lights. We only see it looking bright due to the "night vision" through the camera footage. From this single still frame he doesn't have any external light source (flashlight). Hard to tell exactly what he did imo.

JMO
The camera has indicator lights on it. In a pitch black situation it should be even easier to see something lit up on the porch.
 
  • #38,047
That's the night she went to her daughter and SIL's home to play games.
Maybe knew she had left but did not realize she had come back that night and was home?
 
  • #38,048
IMO in the earlier pic the neckline on the jacket seems to sit lower than in the images we have of the perp smashing the cam.The fit of the jacket looks different, not as form fitting, hangs differently at the lower hemline and narrower in the hips and slimmer in the thighs. Also, black marks on shoes not visible in the other image but could be lighting.

MOO


View attachment 647895View attachment 647884
Pants are the same...
 
  • #38,049
is the lighting on the porch because of the moon or is it because of the IR camera? Was this actually the lighting on the porch at that time of night? I'm getting more confused tonite lol
I think it's "night vision" from Camera. The one with darker background is more pixelated because it's harder for camera to see the details with no light. I also think the one without the backpack- outside was probably pitch black from the perps perspective.

JMO
 
  • #38,050
That's the night she went to her daughter and SIL's home to play games.
So the the day/night before would have been January 30?
 
  • #38,051
  • #38,052
The camera has indicator lights on it. In a pitch black situation it should be even easier to see something lit up on the porch.
My ring has only 2 tiny red pin lights at night. It would be easy to not see them from a distance, unless I'm close enough to reach the door bell. JMO
 
  • #38,053
dbm
 
  • #38,054
No. Every trip served a purpose. She was targeted. IMO He peeped her house prior to this and I would be willing to bet this person was IN her house recently ( either known or unknown) to NG prior to her disappearance. There’s too many similarities to something I’ve personally experienced. It’s horrifying. I hate it. Prayers for Nancy and family.
Those that did work at her house have been interviewed and DNA tested, and no one knows if or when anyone may have cased the house ahead of the crime.
 
  • #38,055
So the the day/night before would have been January 30?
Same "NIGHTTIME" different DATES.......like 11 thirty pm and 2 am. Maybe? jmo
 
  • #38,056
My ring has only 2 tiny red pin lights at night. It would be easy to not see them from a distance, unless I'm close enough to reach the door bell. JMO
Hers is a Nest camera, if that makes any difference.
 
  • #38,057

"NEW TONIGHT: Sheriff Nanos tells Fox News this evening that the information and reporting out there that says the original Guthrie Nest camera video depicts the same person on a different day did not come from him or the FBI.

"The info that it occurred on a different day did not come from the FBI or PCSD," Nanos tells Fox.

As we know, sources from inside either agency may be sharing different information with the media. Above is what the Sheriff officially says on the matter and notably this time he mentions or speaks on behalf the FBI too."
Huh????

Then who???
 
Last edited:
  • #38,058
IMO in the earlier pic the neckline on the jacket seems to sit lower than in the images we have of the perp smashing the cam.The fit of the jacket looks different, not as form fitting, hangs differently at the lower hemline and narrower in the hips and slimmer in the thighs. Also, black marks on shoes not visible in the other image but could be lighting.

MOO


View attachment 647895View attachment 647884
On the non-backpack photo, he might have on a neck gaiter or balaclava. I live in a desert environment, and they are common for sun protection with both outdoor enthusiasts as well as outdoor workers. This might account for the different neckline.
 
  • #38,059
is the lighting on the porch because of the moon or is it because of the IR camera? Was this actually the lighting on the porch at that time of night? I'm getting more confused tonite lol
Yes, Nest cameras have IR tech for night vision (Ring cams do as well). Unfortunately, the porch light was not on or else everything would be in clear color.

I leave my porch lights on with my Ring cameras at night so they can see clearly without the IR. It makes a significant difference.
 
Last edited:
  • #38,060

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
163
Guests online
2,330
Total visitors
2,493

Forum statistics

Threads
643,569
Messages
18,801,240
Members
245,189
Latest member
Milchmaid
Top