- Joined
- Mar 4, 2018
- Messages
- 29,952
- Reaction score
- 715,289
I put her address in the sex registry and searched from her house out 3-mile radius and there are 44 sex offenders. I looked at the ones closest to her house and they all have charges related to minors. Then there was one that stood out, if you put her address 5820 N Camino Escalante Tuscan, Az and filter within 3 mile radius. There is one to the far right of the circled area. He was charged with plotting to abduct a child for ransom.
![]()
FBI arrests Scottsdale man in plot to kidnap S. Ariz. child
PHOENIX — A Scottsdale man has been arrested by the FBI in connection with a kidnapping conspiracy.tucson.com
In this article it says the man owned a security service at the time of his arrest. It may be absolutely nothing, but when looking at the charges of those on the registry near her, that jumped way out to me. He wanted to abduct the child for ransom.
How would anyone know? This was posted last night and we never heard from any other social media source about the SIL.
Could be the FBI doesn’t want him to know he's a suspect?
Why is this not reported elsewhere? We do know she had dinner with the daughter but never that her husband drove NG home..
I also read this somewhere and it had a picture of the security camera but searches for it now are not bringing up anything.Take this with a grain of salt since it came from a comment on another post, but someone mentioned they read that the cameras were cut at 12:50 a.m. Has anyone else heard this?
Somewhat, yes. Is it odd the reward is such a small amount? To me it is. Is there a reason why the family isn’t offering a reward? Being they haven’t shared any description of a vehicle, person of interest, ransom demand, it makes me wonder if they already have someone they’re searching for as their suspect. Hopefully the press conference will provide more details.Does anyone else think that its odd that law enforcement is not putting out warnings to the community?
Tuscon is filled with retirement communities and I do wonder on what basis the decision was made to not place a proactive warning.
I keep wondering who really is meant to be hurt by the kidnapping/abduction? Nancy certainly, but MOO, it would be Savannah. There is no relationship like a Mother/Daughter. If someone wanted to send a message to Savannah, this would go straight to her heart...surprised by the kidnap for ransom dude, so close by. imo this case is really rare and odd...and you do get a feeling this is some kind of staged event by someone who knows her.
who kidnaps an old woman? very very rare in deed. but there have been murders staged to look like kidnappings. mOO
Oh, well that changes...nothing.
Does anyone else think that its odd that law enforcement is not putting out warnings to the community?
Tuscon is filled with retirement communities and I do wonder on what basis the decision was made to not place a proactive warning.
He was in Scottsdale. Now his name and address are on the RSO list for within 3 miles of Nancy's home.Confusing to me.
HE is in Scottsdale. His company is/was in Colorado.
Are you finding that the child that was targetted was in that 3 mile radius??
no... but I was just commenting that the "facts" in the showbiz411 article are not correct.
Yes, I’ve been thinking about this too and thought my mind was playing tricks on me. I thought I read or heard on the press conference the sheriff saying something to the effect, there was something about the inside of the home that was familiar to the suspect that only the suspect would know about, but I cannot find it anywhere now. I was thinking it was the security system being shut off and cameras, they knew where the controls were located and how to disable. Sorry I don’t mean to speculate, but I am sure I read/heard these details.I also read this somewhere and it had a picture of the security camera but searches for it now are not bringing up anything.
If you hadn't of said this too, I would have thought that I hallucinated this bit of information.
gotcha...He was in Scottsdale. Now his name and address are on the RSO list for within 3 miles of Nancy's home.
Sources say the last person who saw Nancy alive on Saturday night was her other daughter’s husband, her son-in-law, who checked in on her. He is absolutely not a suspect.I think if the SIL drove to check on her at 2am, and she disappeared at 2am, this forum wouldn't be discussing her disappearance, it would be discussing his arrest.
I have my doubts about what this report means as well.
Maybe you are misunderstanding my comment.I believe you initially posted the Showbiz source, right? Why are you believing one part of the paragraph but not the rest? I provided the full quote from the paragraph for context.
He shows up on the map as living within a 3-mile radius of Ms. Guthrie's house. I posted the link to the registry and her address and mentioned if you put her address in and filter by 3 miles radius he is on the far right of the circle. I clicked on it and saw that the incident included abduction for ransom plot. I googled him and found the article to post. So at least on the sex registry, his address is listed in Tucson, AZConfusing to me.
HE is in Scottsdale. His company is/was in Colorado.
Are you finding that the child that was targetted was in that 3 mile radius??