GUILTY NC - Jason Corbett, 39, murdered in his Wallburg home, 2 Aug 2015 #1

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #181
People I'd love to chat with about Molly:

Her roommate that one year at Clemson.

The neighbors of wherever the "family home" was in those "missing Molly years."

Any employers of Molly in the missing years. Babysitting jobs, Nanny, whatever?

Some questions I'd love answered:

Why did Molly spend vital career building years...babysitting? And I mean..was it just occasional Babysitting...not a registered Nanny job?

Did Jason find her through an agency? Or an ad? Does the family know?

What agency? What jobs had they placed her with before? How long did she stay in those jobs?

I think a lot can be found out...the Family has more sources than they might realize at this point.
 
  • #182
People I'd love to chat with about Molly:

Her roommate that one year at Clemson.

The neighbors of wherever the "family home" was in those "missing Molly years."

Any employers of Molly in the missing years. Babysitting jobs, Nanny, whatever?

Some questions I'd love answered:

Why did Molly spend vital career building years...babysitting? And I mean..was it just occasional Babysitting...not a registered Nanny job?

Did Jason find her through an agency? Or an ad? Does the family know?

What agency? What jobs had they placed her with before? How long did she stay in those jobs?

I think a lot can be found out...the Family has more sources than they might realize at this point.

Great questions, stmarysmead!!! Would think LE has them answered, already. :rolleyes:

Would love to speak to her freshman roommate. She probably requested a change before the second semester, possibly sooner. And now, if she has learned about the manner of Jason's death, is probably traumatized even further, thinking it could have happened to her! As she slept.....:gasp:

IMHO
 
  • #183
I really hope the children didn't see or hear what went on that night. The trauma would never leave them.
 
  • #184
Hi everyone. I'm posting from Ireland. I've been following this tragic story for a while and have found the posts from this site really informative. I'm interested in Molly's past and can't understand why nobody is coming forward with info on her. It has to be there... One thing I noticed very early on was a photo on mm fm page of the kids.. Sarah is holding a chalkboard sign denoting start of 2nd grade in big writing and in the corner in tiny writing hastily added in is 4th grade for jack. I wondered about that from the very beginning long before the info started to leak out. It looked like such an after thought.. It validates family assertions of jack being being left out of Molly's good graces. Also excerpts from the custody petitions referred to the "minor child" instead of minor children... Perhaps there were separate petitions for both ? Hardly just one for Sarah?
 
  • #185
Hi Fido! Welcome :)

excerpts from the custody petitions referred to the "minor child" instead of minor children... Perhaps there were separate petitions for both ? Hardly just one for Sarah?


There was separate rulings issue for each child but I think both of the custody cases were heard together.
 
  • #186
Hi everyone. I'm posting from Ireland. I've been following this tragic story for a while and have found the posts from this site really informative. I'm interested in Molly's past and can't understand why nobody is coming forward with info on her. It has to be there... One thing I noticed very early on was a photo on mm fm page of the kids.. Sarah is holding a chalkboard sign denoting start of 2nd grade in big writing and in the corner in tiny writing hastily added in is 4th grade for jack. I wondered about that from the very beginning long before the info started to leak out. It looked like such an after thought.. It validates family assertions of jack being being left out of Molly's good graces. Also excerpts from the custody petitions referred to the "minor child" instead of minor children... Perhaps there were separate petitions for both ? Hardly just one for Sarah?

A diagnosis of bipolar disease often comes in young adults and it can have profound effects on a family. One day, the Martens had a smart, attractive child...the next day, they might be faced with a daughter who must struggle with medications, etc for the rest of her life. I know one family who has lived this experience. Their son had a severe onset but it was also shocking to them. He has periods when he seems to function normally, but he has relapses as well. Because the onset of the disease began when the son was in college, they have become secretive to protect the image of the smart, well adjusted young man that people knew...before his illness presented itself.

Maybe, this is what the Martens tried to do. Molly is described as not making friends, almost preferring the company of the children. Maybe there are limits to how much control she can manifest in front of adults. I think she became a family secret, a family shame. And this cover story is because they still don't want to admit that THEIR daughter has serious issues!

I bet the police have a lot lined up at trial to expose the real Molly.
 
  • #187
Welcome, fido, glad you're here!

:lepsmilie::Welcome1::lepsmilie:
 
  • #188
Hi all! Love this forum. I'm Irish living stateside. Have read many a thread here. It's refreshing to have a discussion forum in relation to this very tragic case where there is no foul language, arguing and unfounded speculation just opinions that aren't being shot down. I have followed this case closely from the beginning, have read every thing that has been written and commented on both in the media and on social media some of which commentary is rather hair raising.

I am keeping a very open mind on this case. I feel so much more will come out when it comes to trial on both sides which may cause a lot of upset to all involved. A few points I would like to share which is entirely my own opinion.....

The medical evidence is pretty clear, one or both of them gave poor Jason a serious hammering. The defence will have to have something up their sleeve to defend their actions. It's possible there may be a red herring in those reports somewhere. The 911 call to me is difficult due to background noise at the 911 callers end. I am trained in transcription however and its hard. I'm sure the police has resources to clear up the background noise. Mr martens demeanor in the call doesn't raise any questions to me. I read a very interesting article in a magazine recently in relation to coping with stress. A female FBI agent offered advice here. She stated that FBI agents are trained in a way that they cannot control all situations but they are trained specifically to control their reaction to situations, training which stays with them for life....hence mr martens calm and controlled 911 call. I personally think she possibly hit him and he is trying to take the blame for her which many loving father's might do in the same situation.

Also I think the whole case is being played out in the media far too much and the commentary on the supporters page could be quite damaging to the prosecution case. The defence could argue a tainted jury pool due to the constant media attention and commentary which appears to be mainly from keyboard warriors who do not know any of the parties personally nor ever met or heard of them before this happened. They will simply retreat behind their computers if there is difficulty getting a fair trial and the Corbett's will be left to cope with it. I understand people are angry but constantly giving interviews to the press about Jason and mollys personalities is not going to achieve anything. It's not a court of public opinion. Also the insults and name calling could be used by the defence as testament to her late husbands character....ie if this is how his friends and family behave....he was the very same..the matter will not be swept under the carpet if there is a media blackout... The case will still go to trial regardless if there is a social media campaign or not. Plus aside from the autopsy report, all else which has been said even what the police based their evidence on to get the warrants is heresay from the Corbett family. Hopefully the evidence the police found relating to his possible relocation to Ireland will back up their claims and they have outside crebable witnesses such as teachers at the children's school, doctors and coaches etc from their various activities to back the claims of her volitile alcoholic tendencies. I wouldn't place much reliance on neighbours... That place seemed to be very much like wisteria lane where curtain twitching and *****ing and jealously is the norm amongst neighbours some may join in as they disliked her long before this happened. The whole privacy issue has been blown out of the water.. Those poor kids have been so exposed and not just from her fb page. There has been more attention drawn to it by alerting the media's attention to it. I would never have seen mollys page myself only it has been referenced so many times in the paper and on the support page and I had a look.

As I said earlier I'm not on any side but keeping an open mind. Noone knows what goes on in a marriage regardless how close siblings may be. I certainly don't discuss intimate private details with my siblings nor would I discuss financial issues with them. If Mr Corbett had an issue with mollys spending he should have taken it up with her. Also the reason for her not working outside the home may have been agreed after taking taxation advice. I have a family member who does not work outside the home for taxation purposes as her husband has a very good income. There's an awful undertone to comments about stay at home wives emerging by supporters.. Saying as she brought no income into the house, she is entitled to nothing not even her clothes that he bought. That's not how a healthy marriage works.. Again the defence may use this as testament to his character.

I believe they were both complex characters ,him clearly not ready to remarry so soon after losing the love of his life and she probably feeling inferior because of this and the silent resentment both may have felt, him because molly was not his beloved mags and molly because she could never give him what mags could....children. I do feel however sympathy for any woman who cannot have children. It's an awful burden to carry esp in a marriage.

A lot of which has been going on esp in relation to retrieving belongings has no place on social media....lawyers can find out everything they need to know for them. Papers like the daily mail which is an absolute rag of a paper which is not known for reporting accurately thrive on this stuff cause it sells papers, they have no regard for the children's privacy and tend to exaggerate facts to make things more dramatic.

One thing I am curious about is why the house was not searched prior to December.... Items of evidential value could have been removed during the four months prior to the search. Very odd indeed.

Also what has Sharon martens role been in this?. There has been no mention of her even being interviewed by police.

It's a curious tale that's for sure and the losers in all this is those two innocent children as they have lost so much and suffered huge upheaval the last few months.
Sorry for the looooonnnggg post!!!! I've prob bored everyone to tears!
 
  • #189
Hi all! Love this forum. I'm Irish living stateside. Have read many a thread here. It's refreshing to have a discussion forum in relation to this very tragic case where there is no foul language, arguing and unfounded speculation just opinions that aren't being shot down. I have followed this case closely from the beginning, have read every thing that has been written and commented on both in the media and on social media some of which commentary is rather hair raising.

I am keeping a very open mind on this case. I feel so much more will come out when it comes to trial on both sides which may cause a lot of upset to all involved. A few points I would like to share which is entirely my own opinion.....

The medical evidence is pretty clear, one or both of them gave poor Jason a serious hammering. The defence will have to have something up their sleeve to defend their actions. It's possible there may be a red herring in those reports somewhere. The 911 call to me is difficult due to background noise at the 911 callers end. I am trained in transcription however and its hard. I'm sure the police has resources to clear up the background noise. Mr martens demeanor in the call doesn't raise any questions to me. I read a very interesting article in a magazine recently in relation to coping with stress. A female FBI agent offered advice here. She stated that FBI agents are trained in a way that they cannot control all situations but they are trained specifically to control their reaction to situations, training which stays with them for life....hence mr martens calm and controlled 911 call. I personally think she possibly hit him and he is trying to take the blame for her which many loving father's might do in the same situation.

Also I think the whole case is being played out in the media far too much and the commentary on the supporters page could be quite damaging to the prosecution case. The defence could argue a tainted jury pool due to the constant media attention and commentary which appears to be mainly from keyboard warriors who do not know any of the parties personally nor ever met or heard of them before this happened. They will simply retreat behind their computers if there is difficulty getting a fair trial and the Corbett's will be left to cope with it. I understand people are angry but constantly giving interviews to the press about Jason and mollys personalities is not going to achieve anything. It's not a court of public opinion. Also the insults and name calling could be used by the defence as testament to her late husbands character....ie if this is how his friends and family behave....he was the very same..the matter will not be swept under the carpet if there is a media blackout... The case will still go to trial regardless if there is a social media campaign or not. Plus aside from the autopsy report, all else which has been said even what the police based their evidence on to get the warrants is heresay from the Corbett family. Hopefully the evidence the police found relating to his possible relocation to Ireland will back up their claims and they have outside crebable witnesses such as teachers at the children's school, doctors and coaches etc from their various activities to back the claims of her volitile alcoholic tendencies. I wouldn't place much reliance on neighbours... That place seemed to be very much like wisteria lane where curtain twitching and *****ing and jealously is the norm amongst neighbours some may join in as they disliked her long before this happened. The whole privacy issue has been blown out of the water.. Those poor kids have been so exposed and not just from her fb page. There has been more attention drawn to it by alerting the media's attention to it. I would never have seen mollys page myself only it has been referenced so many times in the paper and on the support page and I had a look.

As I said earlier I'm not on any side but keeping an open mind. Noone knows what goes on in a marriage regardless how close siblings may be. I certainly don't discuss intimate private details with my siblings nor would I discuss financial issues with them. If Mr Corbett had an issue with mollys spending he should have taken it up with her. Also the reason for her not working outside the home may have been agreed after taking taxation advice. I have a family member who does not work outside the home for taxation purposes as her husband has a very good income. There's an awful undertone to comments about stay at home wives emerging by supporters.. Saying as she brought no income into the house, she is entitled to nothing not even her clothes that he bought. That's not how a healthy marriage works.. Again the defence may use this as testament to his character.

I believe they were both complex characters ,him clearly not ready to remarry so soon after losing the love of his life and she probably feeling inferior because of this and the silent resentment both may have felt, him because molly was not his beloved mags and molly because she could never give him what mags could....children. I do feel however sympathy for any woman who cannot have children. It's an awful burden to carry esp in a marriage.

A lot of which has been going on esp in relation to retrieving belongings has no place on social media....lawyers can find out everything they need to know for them. Papers like the daily mail which is an absolute rag of a paper which is not known for reporting accurately thrive on this stuff cause it sells papers, they have no regard for the children's privacy and tend to exaggerate facts to make things more dramatic.

One thing I am curious about is why the house was not searched prior to December.... Items of evidential value could have been removed during the four months prior to the search. Very odd indeed.

Also what has Sharon martens role been in this?. There has been no mention of her even being interviewed by police.

It's a curious tale that's for sure and the losers in all this is those two innocent children as they have lost so much and suffered huge upheaval the last few months.
Sorry for the looooonnnggg post!!!! I've prob bored everyone to tears!

Hi Hotchips
I am also new to this forum. I agree mostly with what you have said the ridicule of the childrens lives in America and saying molly wasn't even their mother etc I find unkind lots of step parents do a great job and its unfair to say that and our culture here in Ireland is a lot different to America . In saying that your comment regarding the media I agree with somewhat. When Jason was first murdered the children remained in Mollys custody understandable the police at first had no reason to question Mollys version of events and I assume once they looked at the evidence it became apparent that what she said and what happened weren't stacking up . There were only 2 people that were poi in Jasons murder and one of them had custody of their niece and nephew the Corbetts knew what Jasons will stated regarding custody of the children. They could not get the children back to Ireland nobody was listening to them . They had to do something in fairness I would do the same being in that position. Were they bitter I would say most definitely I know I would be . You don't mention the fact that Molly wasn't shy in talking to the media openly asking people to pass on messages to the children and her friends publicised the fact that Molly was trying to contact the children through messages on her page that is why I looked at her page curiosity gets the better of people. Early on before the evidence came out Mollys aunt,uncle,friends and cousins were vocal on the fact that Jason was a violent bully with no evidence to back it up other than Mollys word. There are no police or hospital records to back these allegations up just a woman that is trying to get of with a murder charge. They publicised all this on every avaiable outlet writing on senators walls making their fb pages public writing in newspaper articles . Were they not trying to taint the jury pool? Her own friends made a number of disgusting allegations regarding Mags untimely death and the Corbetts only wanting to have custody of the children for financial reasons criticising them for having a go fund me page when last week Mike himself opened a go fund me page calling it Exonerate Tom and Molly which he later removed when called out on it . I guess what Im saying is why is there one rule for Molly and another for the Corbetts. If Molly had been killed and Jason citied self defence we wouldn't even be having this conversation!!! The part about the money I half agree with as you know yourself its totally different in Ireland there are very few stay at home moms she should have her clothes I agree everything else should be given to the children she doesn't need them where shes going No hard feelings or anything. All my own opinion
 
  • #190
dO you not consider the family and friends of the murdered man to be losers here too?
 
  • #191
Hi Stephen no hard feelings whatsoever. I appreciate your courteous response!!! I would have been ripped to shreds if I posted that elsewhere and called all sorts. Yes I agree with you about the scurrilous veiled accusations made re mags death by acquaintances of mollys was crazy. People comment I think without thinking and end up digging a massive damaging hole. Im sure molly wasnt best pleased with those comments either as it painted her in a very bad light. Someone not connected with molly on one of the foxnews reports made a similar comment about her death and it was clarified for her. However in any interviews given they are not revealing exactly what abuse they are alleging took place other than the choking business but I don't believe happened really . Abuse covers a multitude of things and i would imagine they will go the emotional abuse route which is harder to disprove than physical abuse. The newspaper interviews they did do I felt they were cleverly conducted and carefully worded pand far and few between compared to the Irish reporting There must have been 3-4 interviews given to Irish media in the past week alone and its the running commentary that is potentially damaging. I think justice should be left take its course at this point. One or both of them will go down for it. A man died and therefore someone will pay. The media reports really should disable the comments section on their articles because I think this is where the real problem lies. It's the bad language, the attacking and insulting others who wish to say something on the matter is what I believe is letting the irish side down and I know its not the Corbett's personally doing this however a stop could be put on it. It amounts to nothing short of bullying. Uncle mikes wifes fb page has some pretty mad stuff posted on it..... Why is this being left up by her if not for some particular reason. She removed comments where people where insulting her daughter but the rest is being left up.....people should ask themselves why. There is method in their madness Also the people who took it upon themselves to comment on a separate page, which I found through the supporters page, was an absolute disgrace... Making fun of the children's lives and hobbies etc. I know they were called out on it on the supporters page eventually and asked to desist but its still ongoing though posts are deleted after they have have their fun every night. Anyway I'm rambling on this point. I don't believe she was after money. It was the children and I've no doubt she loved them. She spent eight years with them despite the irritating commentary that they were not her children so therefore she couldn't love them like "blood" family. She sought legal advice about rights to the kids if her and Jason split. I think that's fair enough, access and custody always is discussed when seeking divorce advice even in ireland. clearly all was not well but she obviously chose to stay and not pursue matters any further when told if she leaves, the kids wouldn't be going with her. She would have also known if she had no rights to them if they divorced, she definitely had no rights to them if Jason was dead. She is never going to get them back now. I think she knows this and i feel in many years to come the kids will probably seek her out and she wants to demonstrate to them about the effort she made to keep them maybe to prove her love for them i am not sure hence all the custody appeals. The "why" of all of this is what the trial will be about. What happened in the lead up to all this. Did he just announce that day he was leaving and not returning without discussing it with her or had he said nothing and she found out about his plans that didn't include her and a row ensued? Did he just tell her that night in bed at 3am he was leaving and to hell with her and she exploded in anger? Who knows. I would be pretty angry if my husband did that to me though our kids could not be taken from me. That is the crux of this matter...why this happened ....what on earth happened to push these people over the edge to commit murder. I cannot honestly say I think they did it on purpose however I could be proved wrong about this. She had nothing to gain by murdering him and her own family would have known this and she would have known too from enquiries about divorce. Even if they were her birth children, they would have eventually been removed from her care at some point.
 
  • #192
Sorry my posts don't seem to going under the ones I am replying to. Kittie , yes the Corbett family are the biggest losers in this, of course they are, and I have every sympathy for what they are going through. Their family member was murdered and the children lost their loving father. I certainly have not intended to take away from that fact. I'm merely voicing concerns about the running commentary mainly on newspaper articles which could be potentially damaging to all concerned and may cause the Corbett family to have to wait longer than anticipated to see one or both of the martens go to jail for it.
 
  • #193
I won't Kittie thanks. Some have tried before to voice similar concerns but got shot down. The supporters page should be about remembering Jason and the happy times he had with his family and friends and for people to offer support by posting nice supportive messages to the family. I won't add fuel to the fire. I am interested though In the fake profile business though, is that a new development ??? I believe someone connected to the family is making enquiries into something about this or it is getting mollys page taken down? It's rather odd indeed. Her page was stomach churning to be honest. Perfectly staged for her own purpose.
 
  • #194
I wasn't aware of the gofund me page Stephen. I missed that one. If they are stuck for money, no doubt she will sell that she took from the house. Did anyone actually donate anything to it before it was taken down??
 
  • #195
Hello everyone!

Was wondering if any of you could give more details about Molly's outburst at her wedding? Have only heard bits and pieces. I heard she yelled at some people and threw them out because they ate at McDonalds??? Would love to have more info!

:tyou:
 
  • #196
Her cousin when interviewed admitted molly was "upset" by a guest going for a McDonald's but denied anyone was thrown out of the wedding. It was reported she threw her own parents out.
 
  • #197
Wildebeest it was her own parents and her chief brides maid she threw out because her cousin had a food allergy. She attacked Jason over this fact lots of witnesses to this @hotchips regards the things said by Mollys friends I would imagine that somebody had to suggest those things to them ? You don't come up with them kind of things on your own knowing nothing ? People usually say those kind of things when information is given to them . Where did that information come from . What happened as far as I am aware hot chips is Molly and Jason were out on Friday night at a social gathering . She ridiculed him in front of their mutual friends about his weight he actually left the party he was upset and had had enough it was ongoing and wasn't the first time it was done in front of people . There are witnesses to this who have told the police this . He Booked 3 tickets home to Ireland these were booked Saturday (also evidence of this) she found out and called in Daddy and Mammy . The rest we know. Yes there were a few members if they donated or how much I don't know. Jason's accounts are frozen so Molly has no money to use . I can imagine her own parents have paid the bail and fronted for the money so far the lawyers they are supposed to be the best money can buy. Every step of this costs money for both sides and personally I feel Molly is doing everything in her power to torment the Corbetts. The contast appeals, the disregarding of court orders so the Corbetts have to get an injunction the latest moving stuff from the house , every time they go to court or get an injunction it costs money and the guardians have to fly over why do all that ? In my opinion it's Molly is continuing to be a spoilt brat if I can't have nobody can and I think the jury will think the same when all evidence is available to them. With regards the private page and the arguing that has nothing to do with them as far as I know they don't know the person and have asked several times to stop and they won't they are not responsible for everybody that supports the page and if you look those same people never actually comment or like anything on the support page so they are doing it for their own reasons and are no benifit to the Corbetts at all .The supporters that deal in facts far outweighs the ones that ridicule and I feel if the supporters said nothing Jason would be described as a violent bullying woman beating man from Ireland which mollys supports had said in early posts on all the American papers and some Irish surely that taints the jury pool also . I'm still seeing it as there is one rule for Mollys support who can say whatever they want and another for Jason's who can't say anything and like kitty said the page admins are very good and usually remove any comments on their page that without any substance . @kitty Thanks I have found somebody that was acquainted with Molly in Farragut she gave me info on mollys swim records she definitely wasn't an Olympic swimmer she came 6th in some of the races she showed me so maybe she wasn't in the swim team at Clemson after all . I doubt you be with those times maybe I'm wrong I really want to know about Clemson though and this imaginary step daughter or was there one if so why is her dad not defending her saying what a great step parent she was All my own opinion
 
  • #198
Thanks Stephandoody for clearing some things up.

I am not one of those who consider Molly's family to be one of influence or importance. Her Father is essentially a middle manager type guy in a huge Federal organization. Over 35,000 people work for the FBI. Additionally, this was a local police matter, not an FBI matter. Obviously the police sought an indictment and got it. It's hard to imagine how the Martens can explain away that autopsy report when neither of them had a scratch.

But, that being said, I'm amazed to read at the Family site about the emptying of the house! Is it true that the house and contents were sealed by a judge? If so, why would Molly's lawyers allow her to do such a thing, especially pre-trial, when she needs all the goodwill she can get?

I'm thinking that her attorneys did not allow it. I think Molly went off the rails again on her own. Was the Uncle lying about her whereabouts? Could be. Or it could be that he was sucked into one of her lies and she is now taking the Uncles credibility down with hers.

Credibility is so important to her defense. Also, the idea that Molly is a defenseless "victim."

But if she is defying judges orders, she sure seems fearless and out of control. If her Uncle is caught lying about her whereabouts, there goes any credibility for him to support her abuse stories at trial.

I believe that Molly is very troubled. I think none of them can control her. She cannot control herself. I think she will continue to damage herself.

One question. Did Jason have a good relationship with the Martens in previous years?
 
  • #199
Hi all first post here. Please be gentle on me!

I have been lurking on this for a while and I am also intrigued in the Molly ‘dark years’ between high school and moving to Ireland.

So we can state that she attended Clemson for a period of time; IMO most likely a year given that she only appears one yearbook. The Meadowland Swim Team 2014 leaflet (apologies I cannot recall who linked the document above) states that she swam for Clemson. I have undertaken a search through the ClemsonTigers.com page but can find no mention of a Molly Martens in their archives. Whilst not conclusive, it makes me doubt she was ever on the team.

Emory does not seem to publish its yearbooks so it is hard to ascertain if she did attend. Again, I find it doubtful by that is just my opinion.

I do find it interesting that the family have done nothing to debunk the claim that Molly suffers from bipolar disorder. Can we therefore take this lack of rebuttal as confirmation? They seem to have no problem saying people are wrong, lying, embellishing facts etc in other scenarios but they are quiet on this subject. Given that friends of Jason as well as family state that they were told this I think that this claim is credible.

I did a bit of research and came across an interesting page on bipolar-lives.com which covers the correlation between bipolar disorder and lying. The bit that stood out to me was ‘this is why it is so typical for bipolar liars to not only express no remorse but to act as if they are actually the injured party. In their delusional state, they experience any attempt to limit their behavior (for example with the truth) as a malicious and unjustified act of control and domination. Any effort to reason with them will be perceived as manipulative, and ironically may even be perceived as selfish or cruel. They are a bright and shining star and any attempt to curb their manic behavior is a petty, jealous attack by mere mortals who resent true greatness.”

One thing that I think we are all realizing is that Ms Martens’ has a tendency to lie - and not the harmless little white lies that we are all guilty of at point or another. Her lies so far seem to suggest a 6 year old foster son, 8 year old step-daughter, that she gave birth to SC as well as being a teacher, Olympic swimmer, being pen-pals with MFC and the two degrees she suggests that she has. This is not normal behavior.

I do feel that Ms Martens has an obsession with the children. I believe that she was enraged that JC was going to take the children away from her. She knew that if JC took the children back to Europe she would not be able to enforce any subsequent contact with them.

All comments are my own opinions and I apologise if my ramblings are hard to follow.
 
  • #200
@Stmarysmead the clearing of the house is rather strange to me also. The newspaper over in Ireland contacted the law firm representing her who seemed to confirm that Molly was at the property with her lawyer to remove items. I also saw on the FB page of one of her neighbours that it has been suggested to her by someone close to Molly that Molly had obtained a court order to remove her personal belongings from the property. Whether one can argue that white goods constitutes personal belongings is another story altogether.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
85
Guests online
1,514
Total visitors
1,599

Forum statistics

Threads
632,337
Messages
18,624,911
Members
243,096
Latest member
L fred Tliet
Back
Top