diphi
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2010
- Messages
- 774
- Reaction score
- 5
Why would they check her stomach contents? I mean she lived for (I think) three more days. Wouldn't her digestion have taken care of those things?
Probably standard procedure
Why would they check her stomach contents? I mean she lived for (I think) three more days. Wouldn't her digestion have taken care of those things?
I don't think it is silly at all. From the report it seems like they are saying she was hit in that area. But, that is different from saying she was assaulted due to agressive intercourse/rape. It's not clear and I can't help but wonder whether JW's dna was found inside her vaginal cavity or very near it...or...I don't know...
ETA: If the sexual assault was not due to intercourse/rape, then that opens up the possibility that someone other than a man was responsible. I sure hope LE has the dna right...
I still think it was the lamp...
diphi...JW did have intercourse and it was "rape".
It is stated as fact in the arrest warrant.
For that to be determined as fact, he must have deposited his semen in her vagina...confirmed by a DNA match.
I have never really kept up with how long it takes, but I would imagine at least one year. No one has mentioned psychological evaluations. I would think he would have those done in light of some of the bizarre buzz about some aspects of the case.
They may want to get their own DNA expert once they are produced their discovery. That will take more time.
His team may contest the validity of the search warrant, so that could involved months of time. The day they released the SW of JW's apt., WTVD reported that there were problems with the SW based on what some local attorneys had reported to them.
I think there was a post here that said JW's court appointed attorney in Greenville was good friends with the victim's family. I'm not sure how that would pan out. Even if JW says he's okay with it, if he is convicted, he could turn around and claim ineffective counsel at his trial and say it was because of that family friendship. Why did they pick someone from Greenville do you think?
yes...the hospital is the WORST place to be. Outpatient procedures are the norm and she had no complications or other health concerns.Help me understand...With so much surgery why would someone be sent home the same day? Is that standard?
"heavy blunt object".
Not sure a lamp base could pulverize her skull.
Sounds more like a hammer to me.
The arrest warrant indicates probable cause that he did have vaginal intercourse with KT. I would assume probable cause would be the dna from a rape kit?
http://www.wral.com/asset/news/local/2010/04/19/7445405/20100419142339408.pdf
ETA:I'm not a lawyer but I can be picky and hard-headed like one...Is probable cause the same as fact?
The arrest warrant indicates probable cause that he did have vaginal intercourse with KT. I would assume probable cause would be the dna from a rape kit?
http://www.wral.com/asset/news/local/2010/04/19/7445405/20100419142339408.pdf
ETA:I'm not a lawyer but I can be picky and hard-headed like one...Is probable cause the same as fact?
Did he get into the house through an unlocked door? I'm not clear on that.
I know DH said something about hearing footsteps and then opening the door (?) and calling out if anyone was out there? Whew....that takes guts. If I had heard something, I would be peeking out and looking out every door and window under cover of darkness with a cell phone in my hand ready to dial 911......
Possibly. The autopsy report indicates a gaping wound 4" long and 2.5" wide. If a hammer was used it would have to have been used more than once to make a wound 4" long.
A lamp base could make a 4" long wound with one blow. I suppose it would depend on what the base was made of. I'm sitting here looking at my metal based lamp...I think I could seriously hurt someone with it if I wanted to...yes, I think I could crush their skull with it...
What do you make of the time lines as stated in the autopsy when KT was checked on in the A.M. The only thing I can figure is that hospital staff put in their notes it was 7:00-8:00 when in fact it was 9:30, right before the 911 call. Maybe DH didn't look at the time when she called 911 and when she got to the hospital gave approximate times of what time she thought it was when she checked on KT and called 911. That's all I can figure.
That would make sense but unfortunately nothing about this crime makes any sense, thusfar!
My thoughts are on the head injuries from whatever the weapon was. IMO - the blows would have been to the face or top of head if they were facing each other. In trying to understand the autospy report, it reads to me that the fatal blow was from behind since it was just behind the ear. Weigh in for me JTF - you seem to understand this medical jargon.