oh i know he has....Amraann said:He has been claiming this in one form or another since the death of his wife and children.
Always some new evidence.
The hair of a former Army doctor convicted in the slayings of his wife and two daughters was found clutched in his dead wifes hand, according to long-awaited results of DNA testing made public Friday. Testing of another hair, under the fingernail of Jeffrey MacDonalds youngest daughter, showed that it came from an unidentified person, a find that MacDonalds supporters say bolsters his case.
MacDonald asked for the DNA testing in 1997, claiming it would help prove that a band of crazed hippies killed his family in 1970, while he was stationed at Fort Bragg. But federal prosecutors said in a statement Friday that the testing found no DNA from either the man or the woman MacDonald named as suspects.
Jules said:I'm really shocked he put so much faith in the DNA tests proving him innocent. He had to have known what the results were going to be. (I firmly believe he commited the murders and acted alone). I think the reason he pitched such a fit about having the testing done was not so it actually would be done, but so he could complain that it wasn't done timely. He requested, and the judge granted, the testing in 1997. I guarantee you that will be the next complaint filed by his attorneys.
He will have a hard time with that since Mac's team chose the lab where the testing was done. I believe he got plenty of mileage out of " waiting for results" though. It will be mildly interesting to see what spin gets put on these results. Hopefully media and all will ignore him and that delusional wife of his.
Lacy Wood said:It's been many years since I read the details, but didn't blood evidence show the girl stabbed to death in the parents' bed was later moved to her own bed in a crime scene rearrangement? Things like that speak volumns.
blueclouds said:Just thinking about this last night in depth. WHY
WHY IS HE SO INSISTENT ON THE DNA TESTING??? HE KNEW that some of the evidence would absolutely come back with someone else's .
He had someone help him. Most likely a serious druggie that he could and probably DID overdose after the deed was done. He probably promised him unlimited drug supply. I mean, he said himself that druggies probably did this for revenge and Fort Bragg was full of drugged out vets.
So there you go. Not quite like we all thought. So he lets a strung out druggie in his house late at night, he does his wife and lets the other guy kill the little girls. then he gets himself stabbed in all the right places and calls for help.
Later in the week or 2 weeks, he injects the guy that helped him and makes his death look like an overdose.
Oh gee - I'm going to email this to his site......
What a son of a.
Jules said:There has never been any evidence of another person at the crime scene - no fingerprints, no footprints, no nothing - other than Mac saying there was.
SewingDeb said:From Pondering's link above:
Testing of another hair, under the fingernail of Jeffrey MacDonalds youngest daughter, showed that it came from an unidentified person, a find that MacDonalds supporters say bolsters his case.
SewingDeb said:Those are all possibilities, but under her fingernail? It seems that wouldn't just be random.
Jules said:There has never been any evidence of another person at the crime scene - no fingerprints, no footprints, no nothing - other than Mac saying there was.
blueclouds said:But now Jules, there IS evidence within the hands of his daughters. So how to explain that away now?
Why would it be too far fetched to believe he got a druggie to help him?