Ok just finished catching up and wanted to just say a couple things....
1. I think a lot of the inconsistencies regarding when she started staying with the momster (very suitable name by the way) and her going or not going school, can be explained as media mayhem. When a story like this breaks, the media outlets are rushing to print information or to be the first "source" to have breaking news, etc...etc. The problem with this is that a lot of information is not substantiated, is possibly reported wrong, and/or has some truthful info, but only the MEAT of the story is reported and other info left out. Thus leaving "us" scratching our heads wondering what is truth and what is exaggerated for a better story.
2. I read someone that stated the possiblity that the momster was falsely accused by MAM. He is the only one that said she "sold" her and that we shouldn't rush to judgment. I work in the legal world and follow quite a bit of criminal cases and have NEVER...heard of any 

child molester/kidnapper/murderer accuse the mother of selling the child to them as a defense. I doubt she would have been arrested if there wasn't more solid evidence that she was involved.
3. And finally....does anyone know what time the 911 call was made? I'm trying to figure out the timeline of when she could have went with MAM to when the momster called 911