- Joined
- May 20, 2010
- Messages
- 14,077
- Reaction score
- 6,198
Long post alert (maybe it will help you get sleepy!):
Here's something that bugs me about the whole ransom note/discovering Zahra missing thing. If both EB and AB were in on it and wanted her to be discovered missing when authorities came for the fire and the ransom note was found, why wouldn't they have colluded about that and been prepared? Why didn't one of them say, "OMG, our daughter!" and make a beeline to check on her, then come out screaming that she was gone?
That seems like a fairly simple and reasonable (in a criminal way) means of having her discovered missing while authorities are on scene. The whole waiting several hours to report it thing is just so incredibly dumb, even for super dumb criminals.
It makes absolutely no sense. One or both go to all this trouble with the setup -- the fire, the ransom note -- but they can't somehow work into the conversation that they have a daughter sleeping in the house? Can't feign concern for a second to have an excuse to find her missing?
I can't quite put my finger on it, but there is something within that scenario that we are missing. Sometimes I wonder if maybe EB didn't want to be the one to say check on Zahra for fear that she might be scrutinized if she were the one to suggest it or to find her missing. And then either AB was just his apparently oblivious usual self (if not in on it) or was too chicken to start the ball rolling (if he was in on it).
Something is just so wrong about that whole scenario...and not just that they were too stupid to at least appear to be concerned about her safety. One or both knew she was gone, so one or both should have somehow alerted authorities, and it would have been SO easy to do. Was it simply a loss of courage to follow through? Did they chicken out and have to concoct another story afterward?
I can't seem to think of an explanation that makes any sense. I believe their failure to alert to her disappearance at that time is a major big deal in the overall picture. What am I missing? What reasons would one or both of them have for not allowing (or maybe even not wanting) the discovery to happen while police were on scene?
Great. I've just hopped back up on the fence regarding AB......it's possible that EB 'did what she did' during the day and that night he only looked in her room and saw a pile of pillows on the bed (or similar) and thought it was Zahra. Then EB lit the fire at 5am, put the ransom note on the car etc and alerted the police hoping someone AB or LE would discover Zahra missing. When this didn't work and AB blundered along into the next day she pulled off the little act of 'discovering' Zahra missing so that he would make the 911 call.
Doesn't explain his mixed stories (ie was he out and came home and EB came out hysterical about a missing Zahra, or was he asleep?) but it's a possible scenario. I am prepared to keep an open mind about AB, but that doesn't get him off the hook regarding ongoing abuse of Zahra, which he must have known about.
Not sure.