Updated: Aug 13, 2021 / 04:36 PM CDT
This is a continuing story and will be updated as new details develop. Keep checking back for the latest information available. Updates from previous days are at the end of this report. Live streaming of the trial is here. Other articles are also available here.
LIVE TRIAL BLOG - DAY 8
4:19 p.m.: Judge David Reich recesses the trial for the day. The trial will resume
Monday, August 16, 2021 at 8:30 a.m.
4:15 p.m.: Re-direct by Gabrielle Joy Goter. Says he conducted two interviews with Ben Pace. Says he interviewed Karen Bjerke, who indicated a number of instances that stood out to her about people who got mad with management. Says she said she heard reports of employees having guns pointed at them, so she didn’t have any direct knowledge of those incidents.
4:05 p.m.: Cross-examination by defense attorney Bruce Quick. Sandusky says he did employee interviews on April 3 and April 4. Sandusky says nothing came of the interviews for evidentiary purposes. Quick says one report indicates employee Ben Pace identifies several possible suspects: Someone just paroled from prison that issued a threat, some angry employees who had been terminated, some people in lawsuits against RJR who were not happy, a person who claimed people who occasionally pointed guns at RJR employees.
3:42 p.m.: Witness called — Craig Sandusky, BCI special agent. Details his training and experience in law enforcement.
Witness
Craig Sandusky
Arrived on April 3, 2019, to assist with the RJR investigation. He and other investigators canvassed the area between McDonald’s and RJR. Says they were looking for anything that might stand out or appear out of the ordinary.
Says he also sat in on interviews of RJR employees, seeking any connections to anybody or find information that stands out. Says nothing significant came out of the interviews.
Sandusky was involved in the searches of Chad Isaak’s truck and his chiropractic business. The search of Chad Isaak’s vehicle took place on April 4, 2019.
Says investigators were looking for orange apparel, dark shoes, firearms, knives, anything that could cut, potential DNA evidence. He was assigned to collect swabs of potential evidence from the vehicle, so he put on a Tyvek suit and gloves taped to the suit.
Says he and two other investigators were looking for and found evidence in the vehicle. Another agent was responsible for collecting and bagging the evidence found.
Testifies he took 9 DNA swabs from the vehicle. He also cut out three pieces of upholstery from the back seat because they had stains that could be potential evidence.. Also did tape lifts of potential evidence and removed the driver’s side seatbelt and seatbelt cover so the area beneath the cover could be examined and possibly tested.
All the other agents processing the truck were wearing gloves.
3:41 p.m.: Re-cross-examination by Luke Heck. Says she does not recall observing any liquids on the shoes at the time.
3:36 p.m.: Re-direct by prosecuting attorney Gabrielle Joy Goter. Says a wet or sticky surface can cause shoes to slide, making the shoe print more difficult to see. A sliding shoe print could cause randomly acquired characteristics to not show up in the shoe prints.
Rees says the two size 12 shoes provided to her to analyze match the general characteristics of the left shoe print photo from the crime scene.
Says the “peak” referred to in the shoe print photo could be caused by sliding.
3:22 p.m.: Cross-examination by defense attorney Luke Heck. Rees says shoes can have unique characteristics, called “randomly acquired characteristics.” These are markings acquired over time that distinctively modify the shoe’s characteristics.
Could not identify any ‘randomly acquired characteristics” in the shoe print she analyzed.
Says there were some characteristics in a photo of the shoe print that differ from the physical shoe when the two were compared.
3:13 pm.: Direct examination of ATF specialist/analyst Allison Rees continues by prosecuting attorney Gabrielle Joy Goter. Rees analyzed photos of shoe prints taken at the scene of the RJR killings April 1, 2019, with a pair of size 12 Avia shoes later collected as evidence from the dryer in Chad Isaak’s home. Essentially, she enlarged the shoe print photos to match the actual size of the shoes and then compared the bottoms of the physical shoes with the photos. She made a transparency of the photo shoe prints and laid them over images of the physical shoes to compare what matched and didn’t match.
Rees says, based on her comparisons, the physical left shoe and the photos of left shoe prints from the scene of the RJR killings shared the same class characteristics in the physical size, tread patterns, voids and the shape of the heel of the shoe.
She can’t conclusively say the physical shoe she analyzed is the specific shoe that made the impression at the crime scene, only that there are similar class characteristics between the left shoe and the photos of the shoe prints at the crime scene.
Her ultimate conclusion: There is an association of class characteristics in size and tread patterns between the physical left shoe and the photos of shoe imprints at the crime scene.
3:12 p.m.: The trial of Chad Isaak resumes, Judge Dave Reich presiding.
2:52 p.m.: Judge David Reich calls for a 20-minute afternoon recess. The trial will resume at 3:10 p.m.
1:53 p.m.: Witness called — Allison Rees, Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives fingerprint specialist, imprint/impression analyst. Details her experience and training. Goes over testing, process of evidence in ATF labs., quality assurance procedures, how chain of evidence and evidence integrity is handled.
Witness
Allison Rees
Rees says the proper chain of custody and security of the evidence was maintained for RJR evidence sent for testing. Says her work is also reviewed by her superiors to ensure all processes and procedures were followed and that the analytic conclusions are soundly based on the evidence provided.
Rees conducted footwear impression analysis on evidence in the RJR killings.
She received two pairs of Avia size 12 shoes and a CD with photos. There are two folders on the CD, one labeled “Isaak Shoes From Dryer” and the other, “Impressions From Scene.”
Prosecuting attorney Gabrielle joy Goter is introducing several items into evidence that Allison Rees worked with during her analysis work on the RJR case.
Rees testifies to how she analyzed the shoeprint photos collected from the crime scene and then provided to her on the CD and in the physical shoes.
Witness Allison Rees
Explains how she compared the physical shoes to the shoe prints on the photo CD. She worked to create transparencies of the physical shoe prints to use to compare the actual shoe and the images of shoe prints to look for where they matched and didn’t match.
1:53 p.m.: The trial has resumed.
1:52 p.m.: Judge David Reich calls for a one-minute stretch break.
1:51 p.m.: Re-cross-examination by Quick. Says he does not know who opened the doors to Chad Isaak’s vehicle during the traffic stop on April 4th. Says he was not present for the traffic stop.
1:46 p.m.: Re-direct by Gabrielle Job Goter. Says during the canvas around the RJR area, they were looking not just for boots, but shoes and any kind of footwear or biological evidence.
1:36 p.m.: Cross-examination by defense attorney Bruce Quick. Says on April 2 or 3, 2019, he canvassed the area around RJR and he took 82 photos. Took images of time impressions, shoe impressions. Found in a dumpster at Midway Lane Brown boots with a reddish stain. Did some casting of a boot imprint. The casting process melted the boot print, making it useless to investigators.
Says he and other agents did the search of the Isaak vehicle in the McLean County Sheriff’s Office garage. Says there were several people involved in the Isaak vehicle search. Says the evidence sheet shows who found evidence in the vehicle, not who actually collected the evidence from the vehicle.
Helmer says he was not wearing booties or a Tyvek suit.
Says flip phones tend to have a lot less user information than a smartphone. Says could see a call log for the phone and noticed a gap in call log from March 20 to April 4; that is, there was no information on calls during that period.
1:19 p.m.: Continuation of direct examination of BCI agent Tim Helmer by prosecuting attorney Gabrielle Joy Goter. Helmer is testifying about photos he took during the April 4, 2019, search of Chad Isaak’s vehicle.