Dragonfyree
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2012
- Messages
- 144
- Reaction score
- 226
http://www.wowt.com/home/headlines/Poll-Gathering-Public-Opinion-on-Dr-Anthony-Garcia-298218341.html
I know he is entitled to an adequate defense, I understand that. Does anyone ever think about what all this does to his victims' families?
No, and they shouldn't. As cold as that sounds, I believe it's considered a crime against the state and not against the individual victim. The system wouldn't work if we allow the sympathy for the victim (or lack of sympathy) come into a trial. That's why they don't allow a lot of crime scene photo's.
Things are screwed up enough in many trials with innocent people getting convicted.
I think it's a vigorous defense, not an adequate one. What are considered adequate by one judge are ones that get thrown out by supreme courts as have a bad lawyer.
I realize how upsetting this is for families, but wouldn't it be more upsetting if the killer goes free or the wrong man gets convicted.
I live in Omaha and these crimes were horrible, especially the little boy. I can't believe they would want a change of venue - he's more likely to convince a jury in Omaha that he's crazy - I don't think he wants to take his chances on moving to a rural community. Personally I think he's going to get the death sentence.