BigCityAccountant
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2015
- Messages
- 3,436
- Reaction score
- 277
I thought about this red seat seen in the garage a little more and then went back to the aerial footage because I thought I saw it at the burn pit in back of SA's house when viewing the aerial footage---sure enough that same red seat that was in SA's garage is in the back of his house---ironically NOT burned--I do believe he is guilty--but this doesn't prove his did it or didn't. All I'm saying that at one point that seat was in his garage and at the time of that search it was by the burn pit, un-burned. Which leads me to believe there was more than 1 fire on that property--I believe this actually helps the defense more than supporting my point that he did it
.
.